----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca>
To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:34 PM
Subject: bypassing the patch countdown
Is this still an accepted practice? If not, I suggest that it
should be. If I had to formalize it, I'd say something like "if
two developers with push ability agree that a fix is trivial and
obvious, it can go straight to staging".
Adding to the other responses - I often do this with updates to the CG, for
example. Since I'm possibly the only one who reads the release checklist,
it makes no sense to require a countdown to changes there. I make a change,
do a test make and make doc and if it's OK, push to staging.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
