Am 7. Dezember 2016 19:20:26 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
>Jeffery Shivers <jefferyshiv...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi LP team,
>>
>> I am working on automating editorial commands with ScholarLY, and I
>am
>> having some trouble pulling a music function that is stored in a hash
>> table. If I make a table and assign a key 'Slur to slurDashed, I can
>use it
>> successfully in the following example:
>>
>> #(define mytable (make-hash-table))
>>
>> #(hash-set! mytable 'Slur slurDashed)
>>
>>
>> \score {
>>
>> \new Staff {
>>
>> #(let ((func (hash-ref mytable 'Slur)))
>>
>> #{
>>
>> #func f'( g')
>>
>> #})
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> In that context, "Slur" is of course an arbitrary name. However, when
>a
>> symbol is used to indicate what item is being annotated in scholarly,
>e.g.:
>>
>>
>> \criticalRemark \with {
>>
>> message = "my message"
>>
>> apply = addition
>>
>> } Slur f'( g') % <<<< "Slur" indicated here
>
>What are the argument predicates of criticalRemark ?
See https://github.com/openlilylib/scholarly/blob/master/annotate/module.ily
>
>Slur can be a string, a symbol, a symbol list, a music expression (in
>lyrics mode) depending on the predicate it is seen with.
In this case it's symbol-list-or-music? so a symbol.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
