http://codereview.appspot.com/5908043/diff/1/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5908043/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#newcode1326
lily/beam.cc:1326: || beam->get_property_data ("direction") ==
ly_symbol2scm ("calculation-in-progress"))
On 2012/04/25 06:21:54, Keith wrote
http://codereview.appspot.com/6035053/diff/16001/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6035053/diff/16001/lily/beam.cc#newcode1328
lily/beam.cc:1328: return scm_from_double (0.0);
On 2012/04/25 06:21:29, Keith wrote:
It would seem we do not want an early return i
http://codereview.appspot.com/5908043/diff/1/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5908043/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#newcode1326
lily/beam.cc:1326: || beam->get_property_data ("direction") ==
ly_symbol2scm ("calculation-in-progress"))
Mike, any idea why you added this?
The function being patched is the pure-alternative to a
chained-offset-callback to the original Y-position
callback for rests (Rest::y_offset_callback).
I cannot follow the data between C and Scheme well enough to understand
what this function should return if it needs to bail out early.
The prob
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:17:06AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > It is close to two months that I have been the only person running
> > test-patches, even though several volunteers claimed they would do so.
> > It has been the main reason I shelled out €20 for a week o
David Kastrup writes:
> It is close to two months that I have been the only person running
> test-patches, even though several volunteers claimed they would do so.
> It has been the main reason I shelled out €20 for a week of internet
> access during my spring vacation.
>
> My limited computing r
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2012/04/25 03:24:56, Graham Percival wrote:
I get a "chunk mismatch" for the side-by-side comparison, but the
actual patch
is fine. Go ahead and push directly to staging.
pushed as bf2c7f09ff00e6c59877eff5ba5f880299ed95bf, thanks!
Description:
web: a
I get a "chunk mismatch" for the side-by-side comparison, but the actual
patch is fine. Go ahead and push directly to staging.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6112050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
2012/4/24 Federico Bruni :
> Il 24/04/2012 16:00, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
>
>> I'd be happy to make this a summer project, if you and Federico want to
>> collaborate. Can't start until the end of this year of college, though.
>
>
> Thanks Phil, that would be great.
> Let us know when you start, I'
On 4/24/12 2:31 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>I see two possibilities:
>- delete it
>- change it to "projects" or something like that. I think it would be
>useful to have such a list - it's interesting for newcomers and allows
>to check our progress and plan our development better than 600 tracker
Il 24/04/2012 16:00, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
I'd be happy to make this a summer project, if you and Federico want to
collaborate. Can't start until the end of this year of college, though.
Thanks Phil, that would be great.
Let us know when you start, I'll try to help as much as I can.
Cheers,
Thank you Phil.
Dear LilyPond friends: Janek, Phil, Colin,
I have another big problem now. I'm trying to find a global setting that
would allow to ignore collisions between ties and accidentals. For me, a
tie-accidental collision looks a way better than a shifted tie - especially
in tied chords i
I see two possibilities:
- delete it
- change it to "projects" or something like that. I think it would be
useful to have such a list - it's interesting for newcomers and allows
to check our progress and plan our development better than 600 tracker
items. The question is, where we keep it, do we
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>> Hi Janek,
>>
>>> Just take a look at these issues - they are the Lyrics project:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=label:GSoC-LyricProject
>>
>> WOW! What an amazing list —
>
> thanks, i'm fla
Le 24/04/2012 22:07, Janek Warchoł disait :
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude
wrote:
Le 24/04/2012 21:33, Janek Warchoł disait :
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Graham Percival
I think it needs to come from people other than the main
developers, though. We're all
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude
wrote:
> Le 24/04/2012 21:33, Janek Warchoł disait :
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Graham Percival
>>>
>>> I think it needs to come from people other than the main
>>>
>>> developers, though. We're all too burnt out and overworked
Le 24/04/2012 21:33, Janek Warchoł disait :
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Graham Percival
I think it needs to come from people other than the main
developers, though. We're all too burnt out and overworked to get
enthusiastic about something like this.
Maybe.
As for the news, i suggest a
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > It reflects the news entries in the repository. When a new LilyPond
>> > Report appears, it _is_ announced ther
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Janek,
>
>> Just take a look at these issues - they are the Lyrics project:
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=label:GSoC-LyricProject
>
> WOW! What an amazing list —
thanks, i'm flattered :)
> especially if you can ac
Hi Janek,
> Just take a look at these issues - they are the Lyrics project:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=label:GSoC-LyricProject
WOW! What an amazing list — especially if you can actually squash/improve all
(or even most) of them!
>> I have several bounty-worthy Lyrics issu
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:21:17 -0700, wrote:
If you replace *all* the while(flip()) loops, you can remove the flip
function,
Well, there will be one more place: spacing-spanner.cc:291
There is:
while (flip (&d) != LEFT && rb);
By now I can't tell what the whole code is for. Could you give m
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:17 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Instead of joining the gratulations, let me _thank_ you for all the work
> you put in to make it possible for you to work on major improvements on
> LilyPond.
You're welcome!
> I urge you to be outspoken about "this could be so much
> simp
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Jan,
>
>> Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer of
>> Code!
>
> +1!!
Thanks!
> I will have to look back at the thread to see exactly what this "Lyrics
> project" is…
Just take a look at these issues
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer
> of Code!
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Wow, congratulations from me too! You really did put the hours in to
> generate a great submissi
Reviewers: Keith, Graham Percival,
http://codereview.appspot.com/6109046/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh
File flower/include/direction.hh (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6109046/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh#newcode63
flower/include/direction.hh:63: // huh?
On 2012/04/24 03:32:28
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/4/24 Francisco Vila :
>> 2012/4/24 David Kastrup :
No objections then? Please go ahead. Thanks!
I can take care of related docs.
>
> Patch for the rename in docs and lily-git.tcl
The docs talk an awful lot about pushing to _master_. While that has
nothing
2012/4/24 Francisco Vila :
> 2012/4/24 David Kastrup :
>>> No objections then? Please go ahead. Thanks!
>>> I can take care of related docs.
Patch for the rename in docs and lily-git.tcl
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
0001-Doc-rename-translation-branch.
2012/4/24 David Kastrup :
>> No objections then? Please go ahead. Thanks!
>> I can take care of related docs.
>
> Moved it.
Great! Thanks. So please, translators (correct me if I'm wrong): move
lilypond/translation to translation using
# I think you can not rename the branch currently checked out
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> **
> You're OK uploading it to the LSR providing you don't tag it with docs -
> it's only those that are imported into the documentation system.
>
I'm just speaking here from the experience of checking a bunch of LSR files
for the 2
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/4/22 David Kastrup :
>> Francisco Vila writes:
>>
>>> Hello, David and all,
>>>
>>> I'd like the lilypond/translation branch to be renamed to just
>>> 'translation' if there are no objections. David, I recall you did
>>> something similar for 'staging'.
>>>
>>> A go
2012/4/22 David Kastrup :
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
>> Hello, David and all,
>>
>> I'd like the lilypond/translation branch to be renamed to just
>> 'translation' if there are no objections. David, I recall you did
>> something similar for 'staging'.
>>
>> A good moment would be just after one or
You're OK uploading it to the LSR providing you don't tag it with docs - it's
only those that are imported into the documentation system.
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Nalesnik
To: David Kastrup
Cc: lilypond-u...@gnu.org ; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesd
On 4/24/12 7:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Graham Percival"
>To: "Phil Holmes"
>Cc: "Federico Bruni" ;
>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:42 AM
>Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work
>
>
>> [1] of course there was some recent interest in this. But to pu
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work
2) ask the LSR author to add the possibility to insert translated
titles and descriptions (the website itself could benefit from thi
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ;
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work
The problem is not LSR itself. Yes, the docs will look the same after,
but it's not how the docs look like, either.
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Federico Bruni" ;
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work
[1] of course there was some recent interest in this. But to put
some numbers on it: I was expecting ~3 contributo
David,
> .Any problems which
> > might result will only affect that multi-file run?
>
> Basically every use of lilypond-book is a multi-file run. So are our
> regtests.
>
Understood. I also won't upload this to the LSR at the current time since
it could potentially cause annoyances the next tim
2012/4/24 Phil Holmes :
> 1) I don't understand what "say hello to LSR" means.
>
sorry, I meant "goodbye to LSR"
> 2) I don't really understand how LSR snippets are translated, so can't
> comment knowledgably
See CG, 5.8.3, Updating translation committishes (last two paragraphs).
The translatio
2012/4/24 Carl Sorensen :
>>> Let's manage all the doc snippets in Git and say hello to LSR import!
>>> Which are the arguments against this change?
>>
>>It involves work. In particular, horrible build system work,
>>which always takes an order of magnitude longer than you might
>>expect.
>
> If t
2012/4/24 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:04:57AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> 1) manage all the docs snippets in Git and say hello to LSR (see
>> bottom of my email)
>
> Do you mean "goodbye" instead of "hello" ?
>
sorry, yes of course I meant "goodbye"
>> 2) ask the LSR autho
David Nalesnik writes:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:41 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Using define-event-class makes the file unfit for inclusion in
> multi-file runs of LilyPond since define-event-class permanently
> changes LilyPond.
>
>
> I'm a little confused by the word
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
>> 2012/4/23 Carl Sorensen :
>>> Dear Jan,
>>>
>>> Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer
>>> of Code!
>>
>> Contratulations!
>
I concur and I'm excited to mentor it! As ya'll know, I'll be doing my own
summer-of-lily cleaning up
David,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:41 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
> > The examples are written to work with the latest versions. (I'm using
> > the current release candidate.)
>
> Then one could use make-engraver.
>
True, true. My motivation here was to allow it to work
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/4/23 Carl Sorensen :
>> Dear Jan,
>>
>> Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer
>> of Code!
>
> Contratulations!
Instead of joining the gratulations, let me _thank_ you for all the work
you put in to make it possible for you to work
2012/4/24 Francisco Vila :
> I _am_ topposting. Let me explain a copule of things.
Ouch!
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
I _am_ topposting. Let me explain a copule of things.
"Ciao" is Italian for "hello" and also for "goodbye", so if you
untranslate and then translate back, all becomes clear, at least for
me.
The problem is not LSR itself. Yes, the docs will look the same after,
but it's not how the docs look like
I'll commit the current patches on
Patch: Change \bendAfter and \rightHandFinger into event functions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2489> and
Issue 2449: Redesign stream event class representation
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2449>
about noonish.
2012/4/23 Carl Sorensen :
> Dear Jan,
>
> Congratulations on having your Lyrics project accepted for Google Summer
> of Code!
Contratulations!
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilyp
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:52:55AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> 3) Graham is wrong when he says writing snippets is not a good
> introduction to lilypond. I started by doing a fair few that
> documented undocumented features shown in the regtests.
Sorry, I came on too strong there. I didn't mean
49 matches
Mail list logo
