On 4/24/12 7:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
>----- Original Message ----- >From: "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> >To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> >Cc: "Federico Bruni" <fedel...@gmail.com>; <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:42 AM >Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work > > >> [1] of course there was some recent interest in this. But to put >> some numbers on it: I was expecting ~3 contributors per year to do >> serious work within LSR, and to have ~1 new LSR editor per year. >> I think that over the lifetime of LSR (i.e. 7 years) we've had >> about 5 contributors doing serious work and 2 or 3 editors. > > > >I think you tend to see the LSR as a way of providing examples for the >docs, >which it does. However, it has a much more significant value as a >searchable source of tweaks and inspiration. It's worth supporting for >that >alone. In my opinion, the LSR as a user-contributable source of tweaks and inspiration is certainly useful, and I wouldn't want to see it go away. However, I can see some arguments for not having the LSR be the repository for our documentation snippets. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
