GOP meta: pause in new proposals

Hi all, We've been passing proposals faster than we can implement them. That's particularly a shame because there's a *huge* amount of friction and unpleasantness that can be avoided by spending a few hours on implementing a number of those proposals. We will continue with the existing proposals,

Re: Implement optional music function arguments (issue 5023044)

Pushed as b4ff85a2416e4b80deb9eef8329cd230ee4dc944 and preceding. http://codereview.appspot.com/5023044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20110925

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:43:01PM -0400, Colin Campbell wrote: > Instead, we present a special, one time only, batch as > requested by Mike Solomon. Am I correct that these have not been checked by James? I don't think we should call this a "countdown". By all means suggest that people review

Re: Doc: NR Clarify finer point of repeat unfold (issue 5075047)

Reviewers: , Message: commit f84eab93e732ed2b9aa50436202a28f34243c6 closing issue Description: Doc: NR Clarify finer point of repeat unfold This is for tracker issue 1801. Explain as an example, that \repeat unfold 2 {music expression} is not always the same as writing out the music expressi

PATCH: Countdown to 20110925

FOR 21:00 MDT 20110925 As it happens, the one time I both travel (to my Mother's place across the continent) *and* arrange to borrow a browser to cover my patch meister schedule, there are no patches in the issue tracker ready to go.  Instead, we present a special, one time only,  batch as requ

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:40:19PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > dev/staging > > There you are. Thanks, b4ff85a2416e4b80deb9eef8329cd230ee4dc944 built all the docs on git master, so I've merged it with master. Cheers, - Graham

Re: Doc: NR Clarify finer point of repeat unfold (issue 5075047)

LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5075047/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 23:00:45 schrieb Dave Plater: > If lilypond is unable to use guile 2.0 it's the only > hope although my personal opinion is the easiest route is fixing the > compilation problem. A failed documentation build I can work around by > using the doc tarball a failed progra

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:03:46PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> But we still need to find a solution where I have a chance of getting >> work done. > > dev/staging > > I just realized that I forgot to add this to the proposal. I'll > do that later tonight and send an

Re: Implement optional music function arguments (issue 5023044)

Regtests and docs are there. The last upload, however, seems to have influences from a few unrelated commits. Rietveld is too complicated for me. On the plus side, a working version (compiles the docs as far as I can tell) has been pushed to dev/staging. http://codereview.appspot.com/5023044/

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:03:46PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> But we still need to find a solution where I have a chance of getting >> work done. > > dev/staging There you are. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel maili

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probabledecision)

David Kastrup wrote Friday, September 23, 2011 10:17 AM Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probabledecision) "Trevor Daniels" writes: My preference is for a single staging branch. Major patches would be pushed there rather than to master after a successful R

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

On 09/23/2011 05:37 PM, Ian Hulin wrote: Hi Dave, Lilypond (V2.14) needs to have Guile V1.8.7 minimum and V1.8.8 maximum to work. We are currently working on migrating to use Guile V2.0 but it's slow progress owing to the close-knit integration between Lily and Guile. The migration work will n

Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062)

make doc problem solved on my system. I can confirm that make and make doc run successfully with this patch. http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-d

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:03:46PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> But we still need to find a solution where I have a chance of getting >> work done. > > dev/staging > > I just realized that I forgot to add this to the proposal. I'll > do that later tonight and send an

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:03:46PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > But we still need to find a solution where I have a chance of getting > work done. dev/staging I just realized that I forgot to add this to the proposal. I'll do that later tonight and send an updated version. Or better yet -- dev

Re: Big web page

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:03:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > You know, I'm wondering if this serves any purpose. It's a > humungous thing that takes an age to load and display, and for a > long time has had a load of missing images, bad links, etc. No-one > complained much and no-one really see

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:07:39 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Keith OHara wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:11:08 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote: Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: There are 2 significa

Big web page

You know, I'm wondering if this serves any purpose. It's a humungous thing that takes an age to load and display, and for a long time has had a load of missing images, bad links, etc. No-one complained much and no-one really seemed to notice. Yet we lose the images on web-examples and get a u

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

Out of curiosity: guile2 will make rendering faster for lilypond? Other advantages? Since compilation time of big scores annoys lots of people, that would be good to have. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mail

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

Hi Dave, Lilypond (V2.14) needs to have Guile V1.8.7 minimum and V1.8.8 maximum to work. We are currently working on migrating to use Guile V2.0 but it's slow progress owing to the close-knit integration between Lily and Guile. The migration work will not be available in time for V2.16, either.

Re: musicxml2ly: title and subtitle (issue 1913), miscellaneous (issue 5096050)

Hi Reinhold and Janek, I hope I got it right this time. I didn't include the bit about . This will be part of a seperate patch. BTW: I noticed that the midi-block is not always inserted in every .ly file (this is not related to my patch). I will do some testing... Thanks for your help! patrick

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

David Kastrup writes: > Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > >> Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 11:17:32 schrieb David Kastrup: >> >>> It is a compromise between the damage and the good developers manage >>> to do. The higher the number of developers, the more important it >>> becomes to avoid damage, s

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

On 09/23/2011 02:15 PM, Peekay Ex wrote: Dave, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dave Plater wrote: On 09/23/2011 01:40 PM, Dave Plater wrote: I am the sole maintainer and packager of openSUSE lilypond and I have a build failure in factory builds that appears to be guile related, unfortunate

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

On 09/23/2011 02:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Dave Plater writes: On 09/23/2011 01:40 PM, Dave Plater wrote: I am the sole maintainer and packager of openSUSE lilypond and I have a build failure in factory builds that appears to be guile related, unfortunately guile is new to me and I'm battli

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

Dave, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dave Plater wrote: > On 09/23/2011 01:40 PM, Dave Plater wrote: >> >> I am the sole maintainer and packager of openSUSE lilypond and I have a >> build failure in factory builds that appears to be guile related, >> unfortunately guile is new to me and I'm ba

Re: Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

Dave Plater writes: > On 09/23/2011 01:40 PM, Dave Plater wrote: >> I am the sole maintainer and packager of openSUSE lilypond and I >> have a build failure in factory builds that appears to be guile >> related, >> unfortunately guile is new to me and I'm battling to get all the >> packages used

Re: musicxml2ly: title and subtitle (issue 1913), miscellaneous (issue 5096050)

Hm, I didn't understand all of this. What do I have to change in musicxml2ly? My idea was to use the "description" misc field for a custom header variable named 'miscellaneous' by default. I was thinking about implementing a cmd line option ('-t' and '--texinfo') to be able to use the 'texin

Need help with openSUSE:Factory build failure in lilypond

I am the sole maintainer and packager of openSUSE lilypond and I have a build failure in factory builds that appears to be guile related, unfortunately guile is new to me and I'm battling to get all the packages used by lilypond synced up and built for 11.4 in home:plater:lilypond. I've also had

Re: musicxml2ly: title and subtitle (issue 1913), miscellaneous (issue 5096050)

On 2011/09/22 13:26:54, Reinhold wrote: Welcome to the wonderful world of LilyPond development! :) Most changes look fine, but there are some things that can't be submitted yet. See my comments. Most important: Please edit the source file in scripts/musicxml2ly.py and don't modify the in

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 11:17:32 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> It is a compromise between the damage and the good developers manage >> to do. The higher the number of developers, the more important it >> becomes to avoid damage, since damage blocks everybody, an

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > When I say "the problem is limited to a specific case," I mean that I > am not sure if these two bugs (fingerings being gobbled up and the > StrokeFinger issue) are related, not that my patch seeks to address a > specific symptom of a bug without eliminating the

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 11:17:32 schrieb David Kastrup: > "Trevor Daniels" writes: > > How would this code be reviewed? Do you envisage still > > uploading to Reitfeld? Would this be before pushing to > > dev/* or after? I still think this is a complication too far. > > Certainly it need

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:26 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Keith OHara wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:03:33 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com >>> wrote: >>> Slur::outside_callback has changed, however (see dd855b6da

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

Hello, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:55:26AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else, >> though.  It would seem that doc builds are not part of that. > > I think that James only doe

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:03:33 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Slur::outside_callback has changed, however (see >>> dd855b6da30a050359a94ac719e0fc37a2fca666). >>> >>> Perhaps this fixes the

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

"Trevor Daniels" writes: > Graham Percival > >> Developers doing medium-large fixes: examples include beam >> collisions, music function rewriting, Flag grobs, etc. All this >> work should go on separate branches (e.g. dev/flag-grob, >> dev/scheme-music-functions). Once the code is merged, the br

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:03:33 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > >> >> Slur::outside_callback has changed, however (see >> dd855b6da30a050359a94ac719e0fc37a2fca666). >> >> Perhaps this fixes the problem? >> > > Maybe. You'll have to a

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > On Fr., 23. Sep. 2011 09:55:26 CEST, David Kastrup wrote: >> I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else, >> though.  It would seem that doc builds are not part of that. > > Nope, because it's the regtetsts' task, so only the regtests are >

Re: GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

Graham Percival Developers doing medium-large fixes: examples include beam collisions, music function rewriting, Flag grobs, etc. All this work should go on separate branches (e.g. dev/flag-grob, dev/scheme-music-functions). Once the code is merged, the branch should be removed. People can stil

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

On Fr., 23. Sep. 2011 09:55:26 CEST, David Kastrup wrote: > I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else, > though.  It would seem that doc builds are not part of that. Nope, because it's the regtetsts' task, so only the regtests are checked. It's also a practical issue

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:03:33 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: Slur::outside_callback has changed, however (see dd855b6da30a050359a94ac719e0fc37a2fca666). Perhaps this fixes the problem? Maybe. You'll have to ask the author of dd855b if that might have affected problems associated wi

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

David Kastrup writes: > Here is the problem: \with-link declares its argument type wrong > (declares symbol? and uses #"label", a string). My patch has the > side-effect that markup commands actually check their argument lists for > correctness. Previously it just let any Scheme argument throug

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Sep 23, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:07:39 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > >>> \relative f { >>> \voiceOne >>> e''8( e >>> e c)-1-2 >>> } >> >> Also compiles fine on current master...weird... >> > > > The problem is associated with the mess

GOP-PROP 12: keep master in ready-to-release state (probable decision)

sorry, I forgot to send this on Wednesday. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_12.html ** Proposal summary Let’s keep git master in ready-to-release state all the time. In particular, assume that git master could become the next major stable release at any time. If that makes you pause and wonde

GOP-PROP 11: git repositories (final)

Proposal accepted now. I'll start implementing it soon. http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html ** Proposal summary Our source code hosting is confused: some branches of lilypond savannah are confusing and should removed, while other parts of our source code aren’t in a repository at all!

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:07:39 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: \relative f { \voiceOne e''8( e e c)-1-2 } Also compiles fine on current master...weird... The problem is associated with the message "no solution found for Bezier intersection" in bezier.cc, which seems it would

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:55:26AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else, > though. It would seem that doc builds are not part of that. I think that James only does a normal make and make check; that's doable in 3 minutes on his comput

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

David Kastrup writes: > Peekay Ex writes: > >> Hello again.. >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer >>> wrote: Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie: > > fatal error: failed files:

Re: Fwd: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)

Peekay Ex writes: > Hello again.. > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer >> wrote: >>> Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie: > fatal error: failed files: "be/lily-48175def.ly" A de

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:07:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > > > \relative f { > >\voiceOne > >e''8( e > >e c)-1-2 > > } > > Also compiles fine on current master...weird... FWIW, I can confirm this. With 13d24779fd6b71e81

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Keith OHara wrote:On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:11:08 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote:Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12.  The first isshown in t

Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems

On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > mike apollinemike.com apollinemike.com> writes: > >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote: >> >>> Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is shown in t