Reviewers: ,
Message:
commit f84eab93e732ed2b9aa50436202a28f34243c6
closing issue
Description:
Doc: NR Clarify finer point of repeat unfold
This is for tracker issue 1801.
Explain as an example, that \repeat unfold 2 {music expression} is
not always the same as writing out the music expression twice -
especially
in a \relative context.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5075047/
Affected files:
M Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
Index: Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
diff --git a/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
b/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
index
d3f473fa820d545969a63cec3163d648aa3cf7a7..7af38d2d296531e314ad02bdf51a1dd95e5fc584
100644
--- a/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
+++ b/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
@@ -471,6 +471,21 @@ where @code{@var{musicexpr}} is a music expression and
c1
@end lilypond
+In some cases, especially in a @code{\relative} context, the
+@code{\repeat unfold} function is not the same as writing out the
+music expression multiple times. E.g,
+
+@example
+\repeat unfold 2 @{ a'4 b c @}
+@end example
+
+is not equivalent to
+
+@example
+a'4 b c | a'4 b c
+@end example
+
+
Unfold repeats can be made with alternate endings.
@lilypond[verbatim,quote,relative=2]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
