Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:45:10AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> c4;7 does not really look anything like a chord. Neither does c4:7, to
>> be honest. So at best slightly worse.
>
> Trying to channel Han-Wen here, I think the discussion is going in
> the wrong directio
On 2010/04/19 21:13:14, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2010/04/19 19:37:12, Carl wrote:
> Should the name of this property be something like
ignore-prefatory-material?
Actually, I've had a thought: instead of using booleans, it would
probably make
more sense (and allow finer control) to use a pai
LGTM.
Thanks,
Patrick
http://codereview.appspot.com/931041/show
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM.
Carl
On 4/28/10 9:04 PM, "Patrick McCarty" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've posted a patch to fix issue 943 from the tracker:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/956051/show
>
> I just finished a `make check', and everything seems to be okay.
>
> Please review.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
>
Hello,
I've posted a patch to fix issue 943 from the tracker:
http://codereview.appspot.com/956051/show
I just finished a `make check', and everything seems to be okay.
Please review.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@g
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
>
> Hi, from a user perspective, chordmode is unnecessary and restricted.
> You can't combine different voices (in particular for adding bass
> notes), you can't write chords and bass notes together,
You can do this:
\context Voice {
<<
\chordmode {c}
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> Current syntax (using colons):
>
> c4:16 d4: e: f: |
> g: a: b: c: | % etc.
>
> with \repeat tremolo:
>
> \repeat tremolo 4 c16 \repeat tremolo 4 d16
> \repeat tremolo 4 e16 \repeat tremolo 4 f16 |
> \repeat tremolo 4 g16 \repeat tre
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:45:10AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> c4;7 does not really look anything like a chord. Neither does c4:7, to
> be honest. So at best slightly worse.
Trying to channel Han-Wen here, I think the discussion is going in
the wrong direction. It started off with a few negat
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:15:23PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > When we deal with open-source volunteer
> > projects while we have that much stress in our lives, we all get
> > short-tempered. I'm certain that you can think of examples from my
> > own emails.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:31:11AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Graham et al,
>
> From the "header" comments in IR:
-snip lots of good data-
And have you decided whether this should just go in the
@knownissues on that page, or should it be a separate section?
James, once we have an ans
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 4/28/10 3:41 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> My current approach is "what would look best for both tremolo and
>> chords" since the conflict has to be resolved in some manner or
>> other. If there is a particular good combination that is downwards
>> compatible, so mu
On 4/28/10 4:21 PM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
> 2010/4/28 Carl Sorensen :
>
>> Does LilyPond use ;? I can't find a use for it in the index, and I
>> can't think of one.
>
> '?' is used for cautionary accidentals.
> I'm not a dev but I think ';' is used to express comments in Scheme
> (not in
2010/4/28 Carl Sorensen :
> Does LilyPond use ;? I can't find a use for it in the index, and I
> can't think of one.
'?' is used for cautionary accidentals.
I'm not a dev but I think ';' is used to express comments in Scheme
(not in LilyPond however).
Not so easy...
--
Xavier Scheuer
__
On 4/28/10 3:41 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Xavier Scheuer writes:
>
>> 2010/4/28 David Kastrup :
>>
>>> Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have
>>> expected "don't change current tremolo syntax". �...@8 has some
>>> mnemonic value ("play a quarter at eighths", oops
On 4/27/10 10:49 PM, "Nathan Reed" wrote:
> Lilypond would attempt to delete the output PDF before overwriting it in
> Windows
> (but no other platforms). This is unnecessary and causes problems with
> certain
> PDF viewers, e.g. Sumatra, where the PDF is kept open in a way that allows
> over
Neil Puttock writes:
> On 28 April 2010 20:48, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>
>>> So I think we can come up with something that is both typographically
>>> simple and mnemonically compelling… How about c4t8 ("a c quarter note,
>>> tremolo-d in eighths").
>>
>> I don't consid
http://codereview.appspot.com/970044/diff/1/3
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/970044/diff/1/3#newcode3641
Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely:3641: @ref{Music function
type predicates}.
There's a danger here that users might t
Xavier Scheuer writes:
> 2010/4/28 David Kastrup :
>
>> Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have
>> expected "don't change current tremolo syntax". �...@8 has some
>> mnemonic value ("play a quarter at eighths", oops sounds like a time).
>> But I don't like its look. Would
2010/4/28 David Kastrup :
> Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have
> expected "don't change current tremolo syntax". �...@8 has some
> mnemonic value ("play a quarter at eighths", oops sounds like a time).
> But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate s
On 28 April 2010 20:48, David Kastrup wrote:
> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>> So I think we can come up with something that is both typographically
>> simple and mnemonically compelling… How about c4t8 ("a c quarter note,
>> tremolo-d in eighths").
>
> I don't consider that particularly pretty. On
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 20:15:00 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
>
> Unfortunately, it's already in use. How would you distinguish the two
> currently possible syntaxes:
>
> c2*3/8
> c2*3:8
Th
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have expected
>> "don't change current tremolo syntax". c...@8 has some mnemonic value
>> ("play a quarter at eighths", oops sounds like a time). But I don't
>> like its look. Would you conside
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 20:15:00 schrieb David Kastrup:
> But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
Unfortunately, it's already in use. How would you distinguish the two
currently possible syntaxes:
c2*3/8
c2*3:8
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
---
Hi David,
> Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have expected
> "don't change current tremolo syntax". c...@8 has some mnemonic value
> ("play a quarter at eighths", oops sounds like a time). But I don't
> like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
c4/8 c
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> 1. I also disagree with David's statement/opinion that "chords are
> much more common than tremolos". This is certainly true in the pop
> (e.g., music theatre) scores I compose/arrange/engrave, but absolutely
> false in the classical scores I compose/arrange/engrave. Si
Carl Sorensen writes:
> This is what I was assuming when I wrote my initial response. It
> seemed like "a good idea for somebody to do", not an offer of somebody
> wanting to make the change.
>
> Now, I was wrong in jumping to that assumption and responding
> accordingly. But it appears that my
On 4/28/10 11:15 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> In Carl's defense, he's horribly busy with end-of-term teaching (which
>> always penalizes one's real work, namely research) and then has a
>> conference to deal with. When we deal with open-source volunteer
>> projects
Hi all,
1. I also disagree with David's statement/opinion that "chords are much more
common than tremolos". This is certainly true in the pop (e.g., music theatre)
scores I compose/arrange/engrave, but absolutely false in the classical scores
I compose/arrange/engrave. Since I do roughly equal
2010/4/28 David Kastrup :
>> \notemode { c4:8 } -> two quaver stem tremolo
>
> Ugh. Did not remember that.
>
> Anyway, here is how I would do this: Chords are much more common than
> tremolos, so changing notation for the latter seems like the better
> choice. There is already verbose syntax usi
Graham Percival writes:
> In Carl's defense, he's horribly busy with end-of-term teaching (which
> always penalizes one's real work, namely research) and then has a
> conference to deal with. When we deal with open-source volunteer
> projects while we have that much stress in our lives, we all g
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 18:02:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Anyway, here is how I would do this: Chords are much more common than
>> tremolos, so changing notation for the latter seems like the better
>> choice.
>
> Oh, really???
Yup.
> In all the classical or
On 28 April 2010 13:36, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Can anyone explain to me what's going on here, and why the comments in IR
> appear to suggest the opposite of what's actually happening?
The comment is obsolete: defaultBarType isn't set by any engraver
(it's a user override), so there are no de
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:30:29PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
> >> And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
> >> machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
> >> applied), then Lilypond can actually do the required
On 28 April 2010 13:41, David Kastrup wrote:
> And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
> machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
> applied), then Lilypond can actually do the required sorting and figure
> out a proper order at runtime.
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 18:02:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Anyway, here is how I would do this: Chords are much more common than
> tremolos, so changing notation for the latter seems like the better
> choice.
Oh, really???
In all the classical orchestra scores that I have looked at (and I ha
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 4/28/10 6:41 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
[...]
>> And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
>> machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
>> applied), then Lilypond can actually do the required sorting and figure
Neil Puttock writes:
> On 28 April 2010 12:38, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> That's not enough of a distinction to keep it around. Just let normal
>> music mode accept chords with : notation, and \chordmode is unnecessary
>> and can be deprecated.
>
> How would you distinguish between chords and tr
Carl Sorensen writes:
> What effect would this have on the parser?
I have only taken a cursory look so far. When entering chordmode,
something records the chord names and the pitch names, and some grouping
is involved.
> I think that I like this idea, even though I didn't at first thought.
> A
Yes, we're doing it. The project includes to make use of whatever lilypond has
to offer with its own importer.
Nils
Denemo
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:28:49 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Have you seen this announcement on planet.gnu.org?
>
>
> Werner
>
>
> ===
On 28 April 2010 12:38, David Kastrup wrote:
> That's not enough of a distinction to keep it around. Just let normal
> music mode accept chords with : notation, and \chordmode is unnecessary
> and can be deprecated.
How would you distinguish between chords and tremolos?
\notemode { c4:8 } -> t
On 4/28/10 5:38 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>
> Hi, from a user perspective, chordmode is unnecessary and restricted.
> You can't combine different voices (in particular for adding bass
> notes), you can't write chords and bass notes together, you can't put
> non-chorded material in between, r
On 4/28/10 6:41 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>
>> Hi Graham et al,
>>
>>> Talking about
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
>>> problem with order of \consists
>>>
>>> 1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
>>> timing_translat
Have you seen this announcement on planet.gnu.org?
Werner
==
GNU Denemo participates in Google's Summer of Code 2010 with one project:
A MusicXML Importer.
Google Summer of Code is a global program that offers student
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Graham et al,
>
>> Talking about
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
>> problem with order of \consists
>>
>> 1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
>> timing_translator (or whatever Werner was talking about on 673). I
>> know
WTM?
> Based on Werner's specific problem:
> Default_bar_line_engraver must come before Timing_translator
> This last one is easy to determine by looking at [only] the IR: under
> "defaultBarType" it says "This variable is read by [...] Timing translator”.
Actually, it turns out the opposite
Hi Graham et al,
> Talking about
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
> problem with order of \consists
>
> 1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
> timing_translator (or whatever Werner was talking about on 673). I
> know we've already said "there order may
Hi Graham,
2010/4/28 Graham Percival
>
> A few months ago, Marek voluteered to record patches. The guideline
> is that if there was no activity for 3 days, he'd add it to the
> tracker. Marek, are you still willing to do this?
>
Yes, I am. It is not clear enough in every case and I was quite
Hi, from a user perspective, chordmode is unnecessary and restricted.
You can't combine different voices (in particular for adding bass
notes), you can't write chords and bass notes together, you can't put
non-chorded material in between, relative mode is not possible (like for
chord progressions)
If a patch is not being actively discussed, please add it to the
tracker. My memory is becoming increasingly faulty; I made the last
two releases with waiting for patches that I told myself I should wait
for (David's lilypond-book patch, and... I can't remember the other
one).
A few months ago, M
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>
>
> So, do you have any idea how I can override the header and paper blocks in
> a
> global init file?
>
>
i have copied the whole init.ly to myInit.ly and then added *\include
"myPaper.ly"* right after the \maininput line (nr. 25 in version 2.13.18)
and then invo
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:39:27PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> It struck me that there are more options for dealing with
> the "\relative inside \repeat" issue. Can someone look over
> this to make sure I'm not doing anything sacrililygious?
As usual, I have no insights about the content, but in
51 matches
Mail list logo
