If a patch is not being actively discussed, please add it to the tracker. My memory is becoming increasingly faulty; I made the last two releases with waiting for patches that I told myself I should wait for (David's lilypond-book patch, and... I can't remember the other one).
A few months ago, Marek voluteered to record patches. The guideline is that if there was no activity for 3 days, he'd add it to the tracker. Marek, are you still willing to do this? If you're the author of a patch and it's been 4 or 5 days since any discussion, please add it to the tracker yourself. Sorry for the inconvenience, but as you know, lilypond is a volunteer project, and certain key project members (like me) are becoming totally scatterbrained. We just have to make do with what we have. If you'd rather not wait and simply make a new tracker item for any patch, that's also fine by me. Issue numbers are cheap; I'd gladly have 1000 "wasted" numbers if that makes contributors feel better. I'll look at the list of items with a "patch" label on the tracker before making a release. I won't always delay the release, but at least I'll be making an informed decision about what patches I'm missing, and I'll send a reminder to -devel about those. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
