On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:31:11AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Graham et al, > > From the "header" comments in IR:
-snip lots of good data- And have you decided whether this should just go in the @knownissues on that page, or should it be a separate section? James, once we have an answer, you can start working on this. To add the new unnumberedsubsec, copy the existing code, and add the name to the @menu. > > 4) Pester some code people into adding "this context/engraver depends > > on context/engravers foo band bar" into the code documentation, such > > that this info will automatically get into the IR. Oh, maybe modify > > the IR-generation functions to read this new info. > [...] > > 4 could be a fantastic project for a Frog that was thinking about improving > > the IR... > > If someone could guide me gently into that good night, I might be up to it. That's just it -- there isn't anybody to guide you gently into that good night. The only clue I know about the IR is that it's partly generated by scheme functions in scm/documentation*. Mark knows more, and various people like Neil, Patrick, and Carl seem to know everything about all parts of lilypond, so maybe they could help... but AFAIK nobody has a good grasp of the whole system. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
