Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 20:15:00 schrieb David Kastrup: > But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
Unfortunately, it's already in use. How would you distinguish the two currently possible syntaxes: c2*3/8 c2*3:8 Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
