On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
> I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
>
> PRO:
> + one less branch/repo to track
> + easier to fix typos in the web pages
> + we can direct everybody to look at
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:12:59AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
>
Works great here. Thanks, Han-Wen.
-Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
What I don't understand is how the permissions got jacked up in the
first place. I didn't do anything different this time than I usually
do. I've never had the permissions problem before. Maybe I put a
"sudo" in there inadvertently but I don't recall doing any sudos unt
Mark Polesky a écrit :
Is the Hungarian-language news item on the lilypond.org hopmepage
supposed to be there? It seems a little odd. Better if it were
translated to English, I think.
It is lilypond.org news tradition to announce translation events in the
translated language.
Maybe the titl
In message <1244195981.25811.178.ca...@heerbeest>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
writes
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 10:46 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony
W. Youngman:
>I think that's a pretty usual setup (most people I know have a 32bit version
>of Linux installed on their laptop even though their CP
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:11:35PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > Reading music-glossary.tely...
> > Dissecting...
> > lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.1
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py"
Is the Hungarian-language news item on the lilypond.org hopmepage
supposed to be there? It seems a little odd. Better if it were
translated to English, I think.
- Mark
A LilyPond weboldala magyaru - May 22, 2009
Elkészült a lilypond.org nagy részének magyar fordítása a LilyPond
honosítási proje
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this?
>
seems ok now!
i get an additional line (compared to former releases) in the log, which i
don't know if it is really useful (or maybe i don't understand fully what it
means):
GNU LilyPond 2.13.1
»__temp__.ly« wird verarbeitet
Ana
2009/6/5 Graham Percival :
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
> I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
That's a bit surprising because IIRC it has been told to separate it
completely into another place.
> CON:
> - adds 30 megs to the main branch (inclu
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp :
> Francisco Vila wrote:
>> I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
>
> Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox.
>
> Jon
I also have Windows inside VirtualBox.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:11:35PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Reading music-glossary.tely...
> Dissecting...
> lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.1
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 2108, in
> main ()
> File "../../scripts/lilypond-book
Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
PRO:
+ one less branch/repo to track
+ easier to fix typos in the web pages
+ we can direct everybody to look at the CG (no more README in the
newweb/ branch)
+ allows better integr
I've done a fresh Ubuntu install on my 2nd partition so I can create this
lily-dev remix. Lilypond built successfully but the user documentation is
failing very early in the process. The CG built correctly, but none of the
stuff in user/ is building. Can anyone see what the problem is from this
er
Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this?
thanks,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:53 PM, -Eluze wrote:
>
> don't know if it is helpful, but in another score i get the same message with
> a different number (line?)
>
> (lilypond.exe:560): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to
> g_win32_get_package_insta
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
No error message and the PDF is fine now.
Thanks,
Paul
With 2.13.1 on Debian sid I get:
Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'...
`gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00
-dCompatibilityLevel=1.
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp :
Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run "test.ly"
with the latest stable binary on XP.
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
ht
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp :
> Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run "test.ly"
> with the latest stable binary on XP.
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
When I try on XP I still
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> > Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
>
> That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
> correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
>
>
When I try on XP I still get error me
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
li
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
>>>
>>> I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit G
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
under 700MB to fit on a CD. I would go with Debian but the tool
"remastersys" is specifically made for doing Ubuntu remixes and I'm not
sure it would work with straight Debian.
I was wrong about this. It's for Debian or Ubuntu. I can do Debian
if you think it's bette
As we are looking for windows-experienced developers I really think that
the ubuntu way would be better, it is easier for us windowsers.
If you guys think it would be useful then I'll have a go at it. I
think I can remaster xubuntu with all the Lilypond build tools and get
it under 700MB to
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:44:27AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Can't all of the tools be installed from inside the virtual machine?
Yes, but since window users will already be faced with an
unfamiliar environment, we might as well set up the build
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/5 Graham Percival :
> > Yeah, but there are differences --
> > input/new/revised/rest-styles.ly doesn't contain tiny rests for
> > the mensural and neomensural. The version in LSR contains those
> > rests in the .ly file, but t
2009/6/5 Graham Percival :
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff
>> looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote
>> for checking all the snippets at once. Carl suggested th
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:44:27AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> Can't all of the tools be installed from inside the virtual machine?
Yes, but since window users will already be faced with an
unfamiliar environment, we might as well set up the build system
for them.
**IF
BTW, having said all of this, I actually have an .iso of my own remix
of xubuntu that has all of the Lilypond build tools installed already.
It's kind of big, about 1.1GB, so it either has to go on a DVD or it
can be used as an .iso to install it in a virtual machine. I used a
tool called "re
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then
install the additional t
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional t
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would recommend
this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional tools, and share the re
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff
> looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote
> for checking all the snippets at once. Carl suggested that it go in the
> docs somewh
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would recommend
this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional tools, and share the resulting virtual disk.
Bert
Graham P
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:26:41PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
>> - does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
>> making a small Linux installation which has all the required
>> software? Potential contributors would be able to run this
>> in the free VMwar
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
Just some thoughts...
I'll take this all into account, just give me some time.
With your permission, I'll write it into Spanish page first, then will
take it a
2009/6/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
> Nieuwenhuizen:
> Just some thoughts...
I'll take this all into account, just give me some time.
With your permission, I'll write it into Spanish page first, then will
take it as reference for the En
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond. Was
quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux installation which has all the required
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
> Did the original spanish page look at good examples of
> other softwares? I don't read spanish, but it looks
> real different from, say
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibelius_(software)
For example, the Sibeliu
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
Windows machines, not from the actual machines themselves)
As I understand it, people with Windows can:
- run GUB
- get the sources with git
- compile the docs without examp
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 11:31 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
> 2009/6/4 Francisco Vila :
> > I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
> > This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
> > could try translating it into English, sooner
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 10:46 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony
W. Youngman:
> >I think that's a pretty usual setup (most people I know have a 32bit version
> >of Linux installed on their laptop even though their CPU is actually a
> >64bit).
Sometimes it makes sense to "do what most peopl
2009/6/4 Ian Hulin :
>>See >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg00833.html
>> >and follow-ups for the previous discussion on the topic. As far as I >can
>> see, an implementation proposal is already available, just to >commit.
>>
>
> I know Marek Klein did a lot of work on th
2009/6/4 Francisco Vila :
> I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
> This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
> could try translating it into English, sooner or later.
I can help you with the translation, but I don't have a Wikipedia
account so
2009/6/5 Patrick McCarty :
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> can someone fix this? This currently hangs the website update.
>>
>> mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/
>> msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po
>> po/de.po:166: end-of-l
44 matches
Mail list logo
