On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff? > I propose that we merge this with the main branch. > > PRO: > + one less branch/repo to track > + easier to fix typos in the web pages > + we can direct everybody to look at the CG (no more README in the > newweb/ branch) > + allows better integration with the other docs (this is more a > post-GOP feature) > > CON: > - adds 30 megs to the main branch (including the .git dir) > - makes translations harder? (maybe? ... I don't know if this is > true, but IMO this is the only real reason to avoid doing this)
Another small pro: it would make things simpler for the newcomers. At the risk of opening up a previous discussion, would this allow us to simplify CG 1.1.2 - 1.1.3 to 'git clone' ? My $0.02 are in favour of the merge. Andrew _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
