2009/6/5 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: >> I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff >> looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote >> for checking all the snippets at once. Carl suggested that it go in the >> docs somewhere. > > Yes, please. In that new subsection would be great. > >> I ran the files in input/new/revised/ and they all compiled. I don't >> understand what they're doing in there. I just checked and all of them >> are in the LSR and compile properly. > > Yeah, but there are differences -- > input/new/revised/rest-styles.ly doesn't contain tiny rests for > the mensural and neomensural. The version in LSR contains those > rests in the .ly file, but they aren't printed.
They're spacer rests to ensure the snippet is displayed correctly within LSR, since the mensural styles don't support r64/128. > > I therefore suspect that all these files are updated/better > versions of the LSR snippets, and should therefore be merged. > Could you compare each pair of files (input/new/revised/ and LSR > snippet) and make the LSR version the "final" version, then delete > this dir from git? These files are old; I amended the LSR versions when they were originally added (see the discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-11/msg00010.html) Sorry to cause confusion; I should have deleted the folder ages ago. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
