Hello Mihai,
Welcome aboard! I'm also eager to start that great project with you ;)
--
Cedric
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 23:06 +0300, Mihai Varga wrote:
> Hello everyone !
>
>
> My name is Mihai and I have been selected to participate in this
> year's GSoC program. I will be working on the SharePoi
Hi GSoC mentors,
The mid-term evaluations are just now! So, head to Google Melange and
submit them before Friday. In case you really can't fill the evaluation
your self, ask either your co-mentor or one of your beloved admins
(Fridrich, Thorsten or myself) to do it.
Below are the questions of the
Ooops! Sorry guys, wrong week... you have the questions in advance for
next week ;)
--
Cedric
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 08:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi GSoC mentors,
>
> The mid-term evaluations are just now! So, head to Google Melange and
> submit them before Friday. In cas
Bjoern
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:06:30AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > The mid-term evaluations are just now! So, head to Google Melange and
> > submit them before Friday. In case you really can't fill the evaluation
> > your self, ask either your co-mentor o
Hi Mihai,
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 16:22 +0300, Mihai Varga wrote:
> Last week I implemented a dialog which asks the user to open an URL in
> the browser and a code from the one he has been redirected to. The
> interaction was needed as the OneDrive authentication can not be
> completed programmatica
Hi mentors and students,
I'll require each mentor/student team to provide me a blob about what
they did. This will be used to write a wrap up blog post that Google can
reblog later.
Thanks for your help
--
Cedric
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 12:36 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:23:40PM +0100, Henrik /KaarPoSoft
> wrote:
> > It has been suggested to remove fields-table-formula.diff.
> > However, in the "apply" file, it is listed under [Fixes] which is
> > included in "Common", which is i
Hi all,
The other day when playing with a calc document, I discovered an
annoying "feature". Create a new spreadsheet, protect one of the sheets
and try to modify the cell styles: nothing shows up when clicking on the
"Modify..." context menu.
I had to run a debug session in sc to understand that
Hi all,
I've fixed fdo#31190, and it looks like something that could be
integrated in 3.3 but before pushing to the branch, I'ld like to have
some peer review.
The patch is attached to the issue.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31190
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
Caolan, Michael, Miklos,
Could you please have a look at the patch attached to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ?
I'ld like to push that fix for 3.3 as the bug is a regression introduced
by our rework of the RTF export filter.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
ht
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:57 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> It failed after only a handful of documents on the attached with:
>
> #0 0xabd83b95 in
> writerfilter::dmapper::DomainMapper_Impl::finishParagraph(boost::shared_ptr)
> ()
>from /data/opt/OOInstall/program/../basis-
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 17:13 +0100, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> there is already a Netbeans-Plug-In for OOo. But this plug-in doesn't work
> for me
> with LibreOffice and it's SDK. Because of this I'm curious, if someone is
> working on
> such a plug-in for LibreOffice.
It's very unlik
Hello Christoph,
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:54 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
> thanks for having a look at that. And thanks for the good explanation!
> It took me a while, since the problem is not only valid for Calc, but
> also valid for all elements/documents that support protection.
Hum, I shoul
Hi caolan, all,
Could you please review the commit for this bug?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32172
It could be nice to have it in 3.3 as well...
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonn
Hello people,
I know there are quite a few persons interested or knowing the starmath
code... Is there any taker for this bug?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32362
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 21:19 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> writer
Done for the fix of i#115956.
--
Cedric
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Caolan, others,
I have wondered for a long time if sw/source/filter/ww8/dump is still
used by someone... it doesn't even seems to be built. Would anyone
oppose to this removal?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http
Hi all,
I have just finished a patch fixing a few enhanced fields issues like:
* Not allowing to type before the field in protected mode
* Import fields with 0-length content properly
* Fix crash when exporting those imported fields
The patch is sitting here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/lib
Bonjour Guillaume,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:47 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote:
> I use LibreOffice almost every day and I'm interested in Open Source
> softwares, so I would like to contribute.
Then be welcomed among LibreOffice develers!
>
> I have grabbed the code and compile it. Then, i had
Hello Guillaume,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:53 +0100, Guillaume Poussel wrote:
> I was not sure about git diff or git format-patch. Next time it would
> be better :)
Don't hesitate to join the IRC channel #libreoffice to raise questions
like this: there are several git experts hanging there (maybe
Hello Sophie,
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 17:12 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> Now would it be possible to enhance the replacement table so that we can
> execute the pattern *oe* to be replaced by the pattern *oeu* in each
> word containing this first pattern, that could be at the beginning of
> the
Hi Octavio,
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:58 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> Now, look at this, this blog post documents the patch: :-O
>
> http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr/wordpress/?p=472
Hum, thanks for poking me on it... I would have skipped the thread
otherwise.
> The thing is that Window::Inval
Hello hackers,
I would like to make the --suppress-license option of unopkg skip the
license in all cases instead of depending on what is in the extension's
description.xml //simple-licen...@suppress-if-required].
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Descript
Hello Kohei, others,
I have created a bug report for this (fdo#32840)... and fixed it in
master branch.
Could someone review it for a possible integration in 3.3 ?
Regards,
--
Cedric
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:09 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:04 +0100, Cedric Bosdon
Hi Petr,
At first glance it looks OK to me, but I'm no build script expert... I
may have missed some important stuffs.
--
Cedric
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 20:22 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our build service found broken RPATH in libicudata.so.42.1; it is fixed
> by the attached patch
>
> C
ons :)
Regards,
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:00 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 01:52:01 -0800, Cedric Bosdonnat
> wrote:
> >> The thing is that Window::Invalidate() gets called if I move or if I
> >> type
> >> inside a table cel
Hello,
I'ld like to get a crasher fix around the enhanced fields into
libreoffice-3-3 branch...
Could anyone review and cherry-pick this commit?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=0921bd5dc88dfd212fc5a332e0902347377be119
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
htt
Hi David,
What's the status of this patch? pushed or needs some tweaks?
--
Cedric
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 09:39 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:25:40AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 08:00:05PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 15:41 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Not quite, ww8 is "WinWord8", but handles the Microsoft Word 6, 7 and
> 8+ binary formats. To complicate matters it handles Word for Windows 2
> file format as well, and some in-betweeny versions.
>
> ww1 is "Word for Windows 1" IIRC and
Hello Aurimas,
I just pushed your patch to the master branch. Thank you so much for all
those IDL references fixes :) Feel free to continue providing patches
like this one!
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 20:27 +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
> Affected folders:
> offapi/com/sun/star/form - offapi/com/sun/st
Hello Octavio,
Many thanks for those changes. I've pushed them in the master branch.
Feel free to continue improving Writer like that :)
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 15:09 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The purpose of the following set of patches is to rename "Default
> Formatting" to "Clear D
Hello Suguru,
First, many thanks for your patch!
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 01:43 +0900, suguru hirahara wrote:
> I made a patch file. Please notice me if there's any mistake.
Well, you removed entirely some comments containing references to some
public bug reports (they look like #i12345#). In this
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:51 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > Until now we have committed the patches, by me committing them, but as
> > it seems we are doing a lot of patches, it would be nice to know what
> > is the preferred way to do it:
> > - Should we put both our names in the git patch file (th
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:22 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:59 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> > I'm still translating comments and came across a constant named
> > SCID_NEWDOCUMENT. When I asked opengrok the only place where this
> > constant was found was the file reche
Hi Alfonso,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 15:10 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been going through the list of identified unused functions in calc and
> commenting out those that don't seem to be used anywhere.
Why don't you simply remove them and check if it still builds?
Regards,
--
Cé
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
> added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Many thanks for your patch, I just pushed it.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.
Hello Suguru,
Many thanks for taking my last comment in consideration. Your patch was
nice: I simply removed some more instances of "OD" and pushed it. Keep
providing patches like this one :)
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 18:20 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some comments related with revisi
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
> added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Well I forgot to ask you... do you agree to push the patch under LGPLv3+
and MPL?
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration develope
Hello Christina,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:29 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> lines already striked out in the list.
Many thanks for your patch. I just pushed it... I suppose you provide it
under LGPLv3+ and MPL as I already saw it in another of your emails, is
that right?
Regards,
--
Cédric
Hello Guillaume,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:51 +0100, Guillaume wrote:
> Can someone explain me why my patch has not been pushed ?
The simple reason is that most of us were on week-end...
> If I were wrong somewhere, I don't want to make the same mistake twice.
> It was my first (really easy/small
Hi Lucas,
Many thanks for your patch, I just have pushed it.
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 21:28 +0100, xapantu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch to use gtk vseparator instead of native ones in the
> toolbar, which are just a black line, and doesn't fit with gtk separator
> which can have nice gradients,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 04:22 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
> under LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Pushed, but please pay attention to:
* Avoid breaking the build with ill-formed comments
* Provide several patches changing twice the same things in the same
files but not 100% exactly in the same way. I had to ma
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:54 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
> Hello,
> here's another patch.
> This one is also related with bogus comments.
Pushed as well
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
__
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:58 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely.
I just pushed your patch here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=b214264fbb55b1f33e8a50b42113137178da0125
If anyone complains about the remova
Hello Antoine,
Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other
patches like this one.
BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to
provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundat
Hello Kurosawa-san,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 16:53 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some unused files in libs-gui/sv-tools/ and filters/binfilter/.
> Actually they are not compiled.
> Attached patches remove them.
Many thanks for your patches. I just pushed them. I compiled them an
Hello Soeren and Thies,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 18:04 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Now we have replaced tools/list with std::list in ScAddInListener,
> here we used a list, as there is adding, removing, and searching on
> this list, and no clear way to sort the elements. The patch comes in
> three
Hi all,
I have just fixed the bug n#664516, around the new writer table formulas
and would like to integrate it in 3.3 branch. This bug only affects the
distributions adding the patches/dev300/fields-table-formula.diff
The fix to push is on master, could anyone review it?
http://cgit.freedesktop.
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:57 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 14:27 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > I have just fixed the bug n#664516, around the new writer table formulas
> > and would like to integrate it in 3.3 branch. This bug o
Hi Bryan,
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:06 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> I'd like to get opinions (and preferably consensus) on removing old
> Microsoft formats "save as" support, specifically:
> Word 6.0
> Word 95
> Excel 5.0
> Excel 95
I would be all for it too... it's even an easy hack you could ac
You need to pay attention to the internal javadoc-like tool used for IDL
files and some hxx files as well. This has some special tags... all the
doc is here:
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/DevelopersGuide/Appendix/IDLDocumentationGuide/IDLDocumentationGuide.xhtml
and are valid for this one. I w
Hello Joshua,
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 00:58 -0600, Joshua Ismael wrote:
> I have to rotate an image
> but there's no way to do it,
> at least not an obvious way:
You probably mean you can't do it in Writer, right? In that case this is
a known and old issue... thought it's no easy thing to hack.
Re
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 18:07 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> Ok, didn't know, that idl files get handled another way. How do we
> clearly identify IDL and related files, which shouldn't be handled by
> doxygen?! Are these only files with the idl extension? And is the
> doxygen documentati
Hi all,
Could anyone review the fix for this quite annoying bug?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32872
The fix has been pushed to master as commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=05ef821abdff1ec4712cd4b054a21e4180b2298f
It would be nice to have that in
Hello people,
Since I fixed the toolbar menus on the fontwork toolbar, I saw that one
of them as pretty badly shaped. The spacing menu was writing the text of
the items over the controls that were supposed to be displayed on the
left of it.
Could anyone review this commit, sign it off and cherry-
Hello all,
Could anyone review and cherry-pick this commit in 3-4? It fixes
fdo#35805.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=3fac8d73027a2d97bf4cb3e8ec0d6d9d69ad3410
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration develop
Hi all,
Attached is a patch fixing the sw table formulas update in 3.4. Could
someone review and sign it off? It's a partial revert from
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=2b9726405495529d64e7ab8537ea30119f607d1e
The test in the if, was actually setting pNewVal... which w
Hi Noel,
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 10:40 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> please see updated patch
As told you on IRC, it's ok for me. I just signed it off and pushed it.
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
Hi all,
Could anyone review and sign-off this patch in 3.4 branch? The change
from sal_True to sal_False was pretty complex to find out, but I just
reverted it to the value it had in 3.3 sources.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integratio
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 06:17 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OK to apply to the branch?
Ok for me. Pushed.
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
___
LibreOff
Hi all,
I've just seen that there are cases where that change won't fit the
original code. I'll need some more thinking to make it clean or check
what it breaks.
Don't push it now as it may introduce other bugs (potentially blockers)
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:14 +0200, Ce
Hi all,
Could you review and signoff the attached patches for inclusion in 3.4
branch?
The first patch is simply some cleanup to make sw build with debug
symbols.
The second is the fix for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36826 (paragraph borders
hidden by paragraph background)
Thank
Hi Italo,
without any more info from that guy I'ld say that this looks like a
blocker that has been recently fixed and will be in the next version.
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 15:55 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> I know this is not the right place for bugs, but I am definitely not the
> right person to
Hi Marco,
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 09:02 +0200, Marco wrote:
> I'm still very busy with studies, indeed, anyway I started practicing
> LibreOffice debugging with DDD, (thanks to moggi for his support on IRC)
> I'd like to be able to debug it under Eclipse CDT, so I'm going to
> investigate this possi
Hi Roland,
Sorry for the delay reviewing your patch, but indeed it's harmless and
fixing that bug. I've just signed it off and pushed it to 3.4 branch.
Many thanks for your patch and keep providing good ones like this ;)
Regards,
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 22:59 +0200, Roland Baudin wrote:
> OK, nic
Hi Andras,
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:32 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> Could anyone review and sign-off this patch in 3.4 branch? It fixes the
> layout of password dialog (e.g. File - Properties - Security, File -
> Export to PDF - Security). It is not critical but it looks ugly.
A harmless patch fi
Hi all,
could someone review, sign-off and push to 3.4 branch this patch fixing
fdo#37277?
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
>From 63d51247bff1fdb6eebbc19983b881d8b5af8728 Mon Sep 17 00:
Hi Jon,
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:19 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I am trying to test out the master branch, and im noticing a major issue
> with the .docx as well as the .doc import filters.
>
> .docx im guessing is still not implemented, and if that is the case what
> stage is it at befor
Hello all,
Here is a fix for a regression (neither crash nor anything seriously
damaging the program). It's just displaying some missing borders in
calc.
Could you review, sign-off and push to the 3.4.0 branch (or 3.4 if more
appropriate)?
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://
Hi Noel,
The patch looks good to me. Still two other reviews to get it in 3.4.0
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:27 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> Hi
> I have a fix for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36552
> I'd like to get it into the 3.4 branch if
> possiblehttp://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreof
Hi all,
Could you review the attached patch (sign it off, and so on)? It fixes a
crash when reading some malformed ODT files. It would be great to have
that one in 3.4.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.b
Hi KAMI,
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 05:57 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
> /home/libo64/bootstrap/sw/source/core/view/viewsh.cxx:161: error:
> ‘class SwDrawView’ has no member named ‘UpdateDrawLayersRegion’
> make: ***
> [/home/libo64/bootstrap/solver/340/unxlngx6.pro/workdir/CxxObject/sw/source/core/v
Hi all,
could you please review / push this patch to 3.4 and 3.4.0? It's a
simple fix that would save quite some crashes.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
>From dad2c6ac2dba139364b93cb7
Hi Miklos,
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:26 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Preparing for the GSoC project, I wanted to decide what is an easy way
> to test an import filter. Given that the new RTF filter will be in
> writerfilter, testing docx import is a good example, I guess.
Sure, though we have no u
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:21 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Cedric,
>
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:44 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > could you please review / push this patch to 3.4 and 3.4.0? It's a
> > simple fix that would save quite some crashes.
&
Hi all,
I just fixed another blocker for 3.4. Can you please review and push it?
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
>From 6fa0f51c89a18317be5b7181f3c2c68d46784a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 00:47 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > that list is a Gotcha it needs a comment at the end of it on master saying:
> > "This list has
> > to be sorted correctly !".
>
> Why not let the bleeping computer do the sorting the first time the list is
> used? Proper division of lab
Hi all,
Sorry, I couldn't join yesterday. I'm just wondering where the
reviewboard action item went? is that a dropped idea or does it still
deserves some action?
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 18:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Attending:
> Thorsten, Andras, Kendy, Norbert, Christian, Petr,
>
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:54 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> To avoid a NULL pointer de-reference, don't de-reference a null
> pointer :-) I'd like to get this into 3.4.0
Ok for me too.
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:05 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to backport
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=450ce7ee52672e77c6e5fe601d0ed3c416a60b16
>
> to 3-4 and even 3-4-0. As the commit log says, we have changed the size of
> small capitals font
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:22 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> I was just on the usenet openoffice group and this bug was mentioned as
> being a problem with people working on larger files. As this seems to
> have been fixed in the upcoming 3.4 version of OpenOffice I was
> wondering if it was integrated
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:38 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:22 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> > I was just on the usenet openoffice group and this bug was mentioned as
> > being a problem with people working on larger files. As this seems to
> > h
Hi all,
I just fixed some UI problem with CTL. Could you please review the fix,
sign it off and push it?
The problem that may appear here is that I needed to reduce the
available space for some strings. I'm not sure it fits for all locales
thought it should be OK.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
L
Hi all,
Some people complained about LO not producing valid ODF files. Here is a
hack that silences the validator for problems mentioned by fdo#37390
(the missing manifest:version was fixed quite a while ago).
Drawback of the change: people actually using the grid may have loose
that setting when
Hello Knut,
Glad to see you around ;)
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 13:48 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> Exporting hyperlinks to .doc is done wrong in LibreOffice Writer.
> There is a flag (hlstmfIsAbsolute) that is set to 1. It should be 0,
> because all links are exported relative.
>
>
>
>
> Bef
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:44 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> The attached patch makes "dev-install" use smoketest to create an
> installation. This has another advantage: Sometimes people seem to
> "forget" *cough* *cough* to run smoketest(*), and this will
> conveniently take care of that for the
Hi all,
That bug was badly fixed (by me) quite some times ago. Here is a correct
fix (why did I add that code at all ?). Could you review it and push it
in 3.4 and 3.4.0?
More cleanup is needed but it'll end up in master: some options aren't
used at all in that area.
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonna
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:20 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:55 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > That bug was badly fixed (by me) quite some times ago. Here is a
> > correct fix (why did I add that code at all ?). Could you review it
> > a
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 07:30 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> No suggestion to help me to fix this bug ?
> I think this bug is a bad communication about the LibO's involment for ODF.
Sure, read below:
> Le 15/05/2011 11:31, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I try
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 22:50 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Error: XHierarchicalNameAccess: Other/IsSquaredPageModeOther/ApplyCharUnit
> /org.openoffice.Office.Writer/Layout/Other/IsSquaredPageModeOther/ApplyCharUnit
>
> From File
> /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/unotools/source/config/co
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 04:21 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> >>> On 2011-05-23 at 00:50, wrote:
> > The problem here is that you are not allowed to access any element as long
> > as the ptr_vector is empty.
>
> > I think we should include this patch in 3-4-0.
>
> Another crash introduced by a "Remo
Hi all,
Don't apply that one... I had remorse all the week-end for all the
non-conforming documents that may loose that property. I'll hack a
better patch to still read the old property.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 17:33 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some people comp
Hi all,
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 14:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Don't apply that one... I had remorse all the week-end for all the
> non-conforming documents that may loose that property. I'll hack a
> better patch to still read the old property.
Here is an augmented pat
Hello Markus,
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 21:35 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> here is a short patch that sets all specified borders during parsing
> instead of only one border. The problem was that nBorderTyp was set
> for every border with the correct value but SetBorderLine was only
> called once af
Hi all,
Attached is a patch fixing correctly the relative flag for hyperlinks
when exporting ww8 files. Sorry Knut, but I didn't integrate any of your
patches as they were not fixing the bug properly (see troubles with
http, ftp or other URLs like that)
Can anyone review the patch, sign it off an
Hi Fridrich, Eilidh,
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:39 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> In our private conversation you asked for some guidance about how to
> structure the library. Here are my basic thoughts (that are again my
> thoughts that come from having contributed to several libraries, but
> they
Hi Edmund,
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:54 +0300, Edmund Laugasson wrote:
> I would like to ask - is there any bug with fonts embedding? I tried to
> embed all fonts but they didn't - still were there misunderstandable
> signs...
Well, the dev list is not a good place to raise bugs...
> I found th
Hi Kendy,
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 07:43 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > here is a short patch that sets all specified borders during parsing
> > instead of only one border. The problem was that nBorderTyp was set
> > for every border with the correct value but SetBorderLine was only
> > called once
Hello Markus,
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 14:02 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> yes there might still be some problems, I only tried to fix that
> during pasting to calc all borders are drawn. I'm not familiar with
> the RTF spec and the old code(before Cedric refactored it) was really
> ugly and even u
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:40 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> It works if I add a break statement when UIName is found :
>
> for(int nProp = 0; nProp < rProperties.getLength(); nProp++)
> {
> if(!pProperties[nProp].Name.compareToAscii("UIName"))
> {
> pPropert
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
