Hi all, Sorry, I couldn't join yesterday. I'm just wondering where the reviewboard action item went? is that a dropped idea or does it still deserves some action?
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 18:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Attending: > Thorsten, Andras, Kendy, Norbert, Christian, Petr, > Rainer, David, Bjoern, Kohei > > * AA's done > + announce new 4.0 wiki page (blog going live today) (Bjoern) > + write list of things that suck for newcomers with taste (Mitch / > Christian) > + write up a time-based release rational (Italo mostly did it for > Michael) > + move all 'feature' bugs to new "most annoying for 3.5" bug (Petr) > + list mailed with the number etc. > + Petr to decide and come up with a static link of key bugs (Petr) > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria > + come up with a concrete single-git-repo plan (Norbert, Kendy) > + do the surgery at 3.4.2 time when merging is over (ish) > + generate a preferred date for a point-two release (Petr, Bjoern, > David) > > * AA still pending: > + research when gio came into widespread being (Caolan) > cf. http://www.gtk.org/download-linux.html > + the rdb setup stuff is still too cumbersome (Bjoern) > + get SmartArt into master as an experimental feature (Thorsten) > + investigate reviewboard and come up with a more concrete proposal > (Bjoern) > + post single-git-repo plan to the dev list (Norbert) > > * Agenda: > + Action items > + 3.4 release status (Petr) > + RC1 going out ~now > + large number of annoying bugs fixed > + basic functionality is working well for users > + RC2 / final next week > + chasing tripple reviews for patches for 3.4.0 > + be great to broaden our reviewer base > + TSC call time ... > AA: + 14:00 UTC - the new consensus time (get it right next time) > + QA update / most annoying bug skim (Rainer) > + where should bugs live ? links to other tracking systems > + bugs should be in freedesktop bugzilla where possible > + sometimes good to have triage via up-streams ? > + lots of co-workers doing great work, testing happening > + responsiveness improving > + investing in gnumake / Lanedo > + no objections at all. > + 3.5 / schedule alignment with desktop cadence > + should sync with majority of distros & D/T S/W > + and release 2-3 months before them > + so distributions pick up x.y.2 or x.y.3 > + 2-3 months before > + Freeze Dec / June > + release mid Feb / mid Aug > + June is too soon to freeze for 3.5 > + so skip to Dec instead > + schedule allows for QA over holidays > AA: + fill out the wiki with the proposed post-3.4 schedule (Petr) > AA: + look into a plan for notifing of package updates (Thorsten, Kendy) > + Mitch / Christian's list of things that suck (Christian) > + multiple git repositories pain (being fixed) > + make crashing (make bug ~fixed) > + used to developing on a branch & testing first > + problems with waiting for a full clean build before commit > + delay, and waste of time often outweighs benefits > + understandable some cross-platform problems > + incremental building problems: cause much build grief > + update, and build fails: can be just dependency > breakage > + gnumake again can help fix this. > + module filenames (cryptic, windows names) > + split modules with numeric prefixes - to help > compilers > + should have human-readable source file names > + classes always used together - can make sense together > + autogen is triggering when new downloads needed > + even so old-style make dependency problems around > + namespaces painful: com::sun:star:: ... cluttering header > files > + planned to fix for 4.0 > > * Next time: > + continue most-annoying things discussion (Mitch) > + own extensions repository (Rainer) > + discussion concerning discussion concerning > future of our bug tracking System (Rainer) -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfoundation.org OOo Eclipse Integration developer http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
