Hello Kohei, others, I have created a bug report for this (fdo#32840)... and fixed it in master branch.
Could someone review it for a possible integration in 3.3 ? Regards, -- Cedric On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:09 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:04 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > > Hello hackers, > > > > I would like to make the --suppress-license option of unopkg skip the > > license in all cases instead of depending on what is in the extension's > > description.xml //simple-licen...@suppress-if-required]. > > > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fregistration.2Fsimple-license > > > > According to this wiki page, this feature has been introduced in OOo > > 3.3... which isn't released yet. > > > > Do you have any strong opinion against that? I would need this kind of > > unconditional skip to run unopkg from within ooeclipse... where people > > should develop their extensions and know the license ;) > > IMO the principle of lease surprise dictates that, when given > --suppress-license, it should suppress license unconditionally no matter > what some file in undisclosed location has in it. > > So, I'm with you on that. > > Kohei > -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfoundation.org OOo Eclipse Integration developer http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
