On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:40:13 +0100
> Michael Meeks
> wrote:
>
>> It looks like yet-another bikeshed to me :-)
>
> Indeed.
>
>> I'd be more concerned that git tag -l on the 'core' repo has dozens
>> of tags for the s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #188 from Rainer Bielefeld
2011-08-18 21:34:03 PDT ---
Following "Most Annoying" Bugs still are without assignee, can developers
please check?
1. Bug 37620 - Data in reports created by Report Wizard do not display all data
records in
Makes it easier to move the jenkins install directory without the need to change
paths in 'start-lo-jenkins.sh'
This script could now be placed as a file in the contrib/devtools/ubuntu-jenkins
dir alternative to being generated by setup-ubuntu-jenkins.sh as it currently
is.
I'm not sure what's pr
Hi Michael
On 16-08-2011 17:50, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 23:40 +0100, Henrik Jensen wrote:
>>> Feel free to commit to the dev-tools repo directly, improving the
>>> jenkins setup even more would be awesome!
>>
>> I appreciate the trust Bjoern :-), but I don't h
Hi all,
here is another thing I forgot to talk about on the ESC meeting (likely
a good thing as we took too long already). I have my patches in a flat
"git format-patch" export:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=patches/ubuntufixes.diff;h=3612115e051437d0
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 23:29 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hmm... Is this binary right? I can actually read the content of this
> > exe file and it looks like an html file. ;-)
> >
> *blush* - better now? ;)
Yup. A lot better. Now it looks more like an executable. :-
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:40:13 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
> It looks like yet-another bikeshed to me :-)
Indeed.
> I'd be more concerned that git tag -l on the 'core' repo has dozens
> of tags for the same version: artwork_libreoffice-3.4.0.2
> base_libreoffice-3.4.0.2 etc. pe
Hi Matúš,
On Thursday, 2011-08-18 20:49:23 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/unotools/source/i18n/calendarwrapper.cxx#59
> ?
> Is it possible that the else part is ever executed ?
There are various paths how it _could_ be reached, however I'm not sure
if in pr
Hi Michael, Terrence,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:22:10 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Heh - unfortunately, incremental building can be fraught with
> problems
> - mostly around dependencies; quite possibly we should have a 'make
> dep-clean' rule (or somesuch) that discards inter-file dependenci
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hmm... Is this binary right? I can actually read the content of this
> exe file and it looks like an html file. ;-)
>
*blush* - better now? ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpMDrg6miEdu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice ma
Hi Terry,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:50:20 -0400
Terrence Enger wrote:
> I do have another "something goes wrong" that I have not
> mentioned here because I cannot say exactly how to make it
> go wrong. Is there a way that I can make LibreOffice log
> my actions--keystrokes, mouse clicks--so that I
Hi Kohei,
On Thursday, 2011-08-18 14:52:47 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/extern/ccache.exe
>
> Hmm... Is this binary right? I can actually read the content of this
> exe file and it looks like an html file. ;-)
>
> Not to mention I have trouble executing this..
Hi Michael, Josh, all!
Am Dienstag, den 16.08.2011, 12:18 +0100 schrieb Michael Meeks:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:29 +0930, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> > I have made some additional changes to the dialog. I am considering
> > these changes stage 1 of the process.
[...]
> I sus
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Olivier Hallot
wrote:
> Hi
> I am trying to build under windows 7 64Bits. I have installed Microsoft
> Windows SDK, but autogen is not able to find it no matter the trials I made.
>
> So can someone tell me what is the exact path to pass to
> "--with-windows-sdk-h
Hi
I am trying to build under windows 7 64Bits. I have installed Microsoft
Windows SDK, but autogen is not able to find it no matter the trials I made.
So can someone tell me what is the exact path to pass to
"--with-windows-sdk-home"?
The SDK is in 2 places:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDK
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:37 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
>> On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele
>> > Barabucci wrote:
>> >> Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Cou
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:37 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele
> > Barabucci wrote:
> >> Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Could it be changed?
Why is it worth changing ? :-) cert
Hi Terrence,
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 14:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> I just wish I could stop thinking about ways to
> attack the problem. ... I thought of another way
> even as I was writing the previous sentence.
:-)
> One SEGV has happened only with an earlier build. I do have
> a
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:00 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > I have just pushed the ccache for MSVC to dev-tools:
> >
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/ccache-msvc
> >
> Neat! For consistency, copied the ccache.exe binary over to
>
> ht
Hi Micheal,
could you have a look at:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/unotools/source/i18n/calendarwrapper.cxx#59
?
Is it possible that the else part is ever executed ?
Because there is getComponentInstance which calls
loadSharedLibComponentFactory and does not pass prefix information.
m
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 11:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Terence,
>
> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> > Resolution: I hereby resolve that I shall ask about my next
> > rebuild problem *before* I confuse things beyond
> > description.
>
> Heh - unfortunately, i
On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci
wrote:
I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as the second bugfix r
Matúš Kukan wrote (18-08-11 19:29)
ou, this is my fault, I will look at it.
Thanks for looking at it.
Thanks for letting know.
Look forward to your solution :-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
On 18 August 2011 19:25, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Cor Nouws wrote (18-08-11 18:06)
>
>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
>> /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/smoketestoo_native
>>
>> etc etc )
>>
>> hint?
>
> Hmm, earlier in the output it reads
>
> " **
Cor Nouws wrote (18-08-11 18:06)
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/smoketestoo_native
etc etc )
hint?
Hmm, earlier in the output it reads
" ***
Successful packaging process!
*
Hi,
make ran without problems (after one stop in tail_build)
make dev-install gives error
...
-env:arg-env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH"${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}"
-env:arg-testarg.smoketest.doc=/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/solver/350/unxlngi6.pro/bin/smoketestdoc.sxw
--protector \
/home/cono/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 34184, which changed state.
Bug 34184 Summary: [Task]: Make E-mail MAILMERGE usable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34184
What|Old Value |New Value
--
* Present:
+ Norbert, David, Rainer, Bjoern, Kendy, Kohei,
Caolan, Petr, Cedric, Lubos, Michael, Mitch
+ Completed Action Items:
+ get SmartArt interop. feature into master (Thorsten)
+ easy hacks - completion / fixing (Bjoern)
+ looks pretty: eg.
On 08/18/2011 01:19 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
I think we have someting in this direction already in calc. You should
have a closer look at ScPrintFunc, especially at ScPrintfunc::PrintPage.
Thank you, Markus. I will try to poke into ScPrintFunc :D
Best Regards,
Ta Tung
___
Hi,
Previous week starts here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/lo-gsoc/tree/README#n1283
In short, it was about:
- added paragraph vertical alignment support to dmapper (improves rtf
and docx import)
- implemented support for the PAGEREF field in dmapper
- implemented footnote/endnote rel
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci
wrote:
> I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
> instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
> I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as the second bugfix release for 3.3.4, or, in
> more mat
2011/8/18 Eike Rathke :
> Hi Matúš,
>
> On Monday, 2011-08-15 13:50:44 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to build bigger libraries
>
> What would be the benefit of that in this specific case?
>
I don't want to merge these two but also others always loaded
libraries in application
and later
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:35:25PM -0400, Terrence Enger
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:38 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > So, can I just rename ItemHolder2 in svtools to ItemHolder3 ?
>
> I have a vague memory from the times of OpenOffice.org of a
> numeric suffix on a name ind
Hi Caolán,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:27:21 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 00:41 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I took a look to the problem related to the Adress Data Souce Wizard
>> ( it's not loaded on master ) and it's not caused by the changes i've
>> been
On 17/08/11 19:02, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Which leads me to another bug: If I remove the librarie's only dialog
and save, I restart LO, I reopen the file again, the dialog is
back.
probably worth opening another bug for that then, anyway, lets look
at one thing at a time ( otherwise I will
-
|Иcпользование иноcтранных юpисдикций |
|для выxодa укpаинских компaний нa IPO, |
|минимизaции нaлoгoобложения|
|и зaщиты бизнeса |
-
> г. Kиeв, ул. Гopь
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 13:04 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Radek,
>
> What was our EMF+ story in the end ? did this stay disabled or did it
> get resurrected for Win32 and elsewhere ? :-)
It is still disabled on win32, should work on unx AFAIK.
Cheers
Radek
> Thanks,
>
>
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:02 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > And do we have somebody like that? Who can decide if it is ok to change
> > the
> > template to this version?
>
> Yes - and yes it's fine.
>
Good then, tweaked Lubos' proposal with the conflict markers &
pus
Hi Radek,
What was our EMF+ story in the end ? did this stay disabled or did it
get resurrected for Win32 and elsewhere ? :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
Forwarded Message
From: Jesús Corrius
To: michael.me...@novell.com
Cc: Tor Lillqvist , libreoffice-de
Hi Lionel
On 17/08/11 19:02, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Noel Power wrote:
On 16/08/11 17:32, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I did now. Reproduced there, but someone (you?) pushed my patch so
*now* one cannot reproduce it anymore. I also took the liberty of
a
Perhaps it would be a good idea to add some comments to that code so that
analysis is preserving for future generations
of code archeologists :-)
Seriously, I often do this because it saves me time later when I look at some
code and think "why is it doing _that__???"
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On T
New Page 1