2011/8/18 Eike Rathke <o...@erack.de>:
> Hi Matúš,
>
> On Monday, 2011-08-15 13:50:44 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to build bigger libraries
>
> What would be the benefit of that in this specific case?
>
I don't want to merge these two but also others always loaded
libraries in application
and later also start using link-time optimization,
all these things just if enabled.
>> but I have small problem with ItemHolder2.
>> It's implemented in svl/source/config/itemholder2.cxx and also in
>> svtools/source/config/itemholder2.cxx.
>> The one in svtools seems to be more general but svtools's library is
>> linking against the svl one.
>
> They implement exclusively different sets regarding the items of the
> configuration parts in {svl,svtools}/source/config/
>
> Maybe history sheds some light here: svl was factored out from svtools
> and contains the parts that do not need vcl. I think lumping them
> together again actually is not a good idea.
>
Thanks for explaining, I decided to use namespace.
Matus
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
