Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > So without much ado the simplified layout that I myself find sane > (and hopefully you will like it too): > > d.tdf.o <- domain > | > \ - PACKAGENAME (if the hosted packages are more than libreoffice) > | > \ - latest (symlink to latest version folder) > \ - PACKAGEVERSION (full package version like 3.4.3.1) > | (the folders should be kept empty > if we have nothing for version) > \- src/ > \- box/ > \- deb/ > \- rpm/ > \- win/ > \- mac/ > > Having source below the version is no prob, full version names like 3.4.3.1 neither - not being able to move stuff around *is* a problem.
The reason here is that we don't mirror old versions (that would put too much burden on our friendly mirror donors), thus they will require different paths - what could be possible is to keep a copy/hardlink in the old tree right away, so packagers would only access the download site via d.tdf.o/old/... - I gather you'd not be terribly concerned if the box/.../win subdirs are initially empty there? I'd like to avoid people downloading binaries from there en masse. Sounds ok? -- Thorsten
pgpLcb03p52qp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
