Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:46:25 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > ---disable-kde4 > > +--enable-kde4 > > so - really I would like to avoid this. This fix is better than nothing. Defaulting to qt3 confused many (who rightfully think they have kde-dev installed). I agree that auto-detection is t

Re: [Libreoffice] yum-builddep question ...

2010-10-25 Thread Terrell Prude' Jr.
Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: Glad to test, but a little tip would help. My other boxes, including the one I'm on now, are all running CentOS 5, and the "yum-builddep openoffice.org" command returns "no openoffice.org.src". Is there a specific repository I need to point t

Re: [Libreoffice] Image Compression Patch

2010-10-25 Thread Andrew C. E. Dent
Hi Kendy. Thanks again for checking into this. I've done more testing and I think the problem is with your image decoder (ImageMagick). The problem icons are encoded as RGB + Simple 1 'colour' transparency. It may be a bit unusual, but is supported by the PNG spec and works with LibO's png dec

[Libreoffice] vos removal is now merged in master

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
After a heroic review by kendy, the vos-removal branch has been merged into master and is being pushed as I type :-) here was no volonteer to do a test build on windows prior to the merge... so things may go wrong there. (hopefully trivial things like a missing include, a missing library in a link

[Libreoffice] commit bootstrap:abb03ac2ac85c67167d17277fefa8309a99f1100 break the build

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
commit bootstrap:abb03ac2ac85c67167d17277fefa8309a99f1100 break the build for me in instsetoo_native. = Building module instsetoo_native = Entering /lo/ref/rawbuild/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/unix Entering /lo/ref/rawbuild/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi

Re: [Libreoffice] howto for getting non-trivial cppunit tests up and running

2010-10-25 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 20:44 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > So the sc test, while working reliably for me, is apparently not > working for Kohei and others So, I came home and did a clean re-build of the latest source tree on my reasonably fast desktop machine, and the unit test now runs with

[Libreoffice] First build error: segmentation fault on vcl

2010-10-25 Thread Dave Lacy Kusters
I hit an error on my first compile that I haven't seen discussed in the archive or elsewhere online. After the vcl project failed to build in the omnibus make, I ran 'build' in the vcl project. All was going fine until the vcl/util project. Here is my error: Entering /home/dlacykusters/libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Several comment translations in formula

2010-10-25 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hola Adrià, 2010/10/25 Adrià Cereto Massagué : > Hello, > Some comments translated from german to english (all the ones reported by > the german-detecting script and all the non-detected ones in files which had > detected comments.) > I haven't seen any more german comments there, but I may have m

[Libreoffice] Easy Task - systray build progress tracker

2010-10-25 Thread Luke Dixon
Hello, I thought I would try one of the easy tasks and the zenity systray one seemed the most fun for me to look at. After getting it working I figured I needed to also add it to the configure system, I hope I've got that bit right. I wasn't sure about where in the file to add these, so sorry if I

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Several comment translations in formula

2010-10-25 Thread Adrià Cereto Massagué
Hello, Some comments translated from german to english (all the ones reported by the german-detecting script and all the non-detected ones in files which had detected comments.) I haven't seen any more german comments there, but I may have missed some. I also deleted a commented out chunk of code.

[Libreoffice] freeze on operations calling the "save as" dialog box running KDE 3.5.x (was:LibreOffice beta2 linux deb packages on KDE3.5 - freeze on pdf export)

2010-10-25 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi all, Friedrich Strohmaier schrieb: >PDF Export causes freeze on my kubuntu7.10 box which is running > KDE3.5. I also tested it on a still valid kubuntu8.04LTS. >There was no appropriate echo while asking at >disc...@documentfoundation.org: >http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundatio

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> I have a segfault running smoketest. > > Its cold comfort, but smoketest works for me ok. can you post the ./bin/g log of where you are at (and mybe your autogen parameters), so

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] First try

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:03 +0200, Gert Faller wrote: > Ok, then a second try. Perfect; no attachment - but I committed the last one with your full name :-) Thanks ! Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Re: [Libreoffice] killing EPM ...

2010-10-25 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Michael, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: >        Soo ... I hate EPM ;-) not sure if that is a universal feeling, but it > certainly fouls up the compilation, deps and smoke-testing process. Well - never did play foul on any of the tinderboxes/buildslaves. >        Do

Re: [Libreoffice] Turkish translation mailing list

2010-10-25 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:03 +0300, Gökçen Eraslan wrote: > Pazartesi 18 Ekim 2010 günü (saat 22:25:35) Gökcen Eraslan şunları yazmıştı: > > Can you also create a mailing list[1] for Turkish LibreOffice > > translations? > > [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists > Ping? cmc

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Michael Meeks wrote: > The Document Foundation (as/when it exists) being your > 'proxy' for future versions ? Even though I'm not personally involved, this seems to be an interesting suggestion, although as Kevin noticed it could become similar to copyright assignments/agreements - which have been

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-25 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I have a segfault running smoketest. Its cold comfort, but smoketest works for me ok. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/li

[Libreoffice] killing EPM ...

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, Soo ... I hate EPM ;-) not sure if that is a universal feeling, but it certainly fouls up the compilation, deps and smoke-testing process. Do we use EPM for building the generic Linux builds though ? and if so, should we ? ;-) and/or is that hyper-useful for tinderboxes /

Re: [Libreoffice] First try

2010-10-25 Thread Gert Faller
Selon Michael Meeks : > Hi there, > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:05 +0200, gertfal...@aliceadsl.fr wrote: > > just a first test. > > Drat, and I really wanted to merge it quickly, but it seems git wants > your real name (if you can share it) ? > > Nice patch though ! :-) [ better as an a

Re: [Libreoffice] First try

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:05 +0200, gertfal...@aliceadsl.fr wrote: > just a first test. Drat, and I really wanted to merge it quickly, but it seems git wants your real name (if you can share it) ? Nice patch though ! :-) [ better as an attachment though, I think your mai

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Wols, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 18:50 +0100, Wols Lists wrote: > So. I'll try and improve my autoconf-fu :-) cool :-) thanks. > First thing to check - I presume if no config is specified then the > variables get set to null, so I need to check for three states ie yes, > no and null.

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on windows 7

2010-10-25 Thread Martin Gallwey
I was going to patch it to do a 'tar --same-owner' instead, Hmm, you mean --no-same-owner? Same thing, no? This is mostly a guess, but are you running the build as Administrator (you shouldn't), or does Cygwin for some other reason (broken Cygwin /etc/passwd file?) think you are root (in

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing LibreOffice extensions

2010-10-25 Thread Constantin Makshin
On Monday 25 October 2010 16:12:22 Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > I think it'd be nice to allow the user choose what extensions [s]he wants > > to > > install > > But isn't that the case already? Aren't the individual extensions > de-selectable if one chooses the "custom" installation? In the version

[Libreoffice] First try

2010-10-25 Thread gertfaller
Hello, just a first test. /* * Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ * * The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version * 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * http://www

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Wols Lists
On 25/10/10 17:19, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:37 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable flag for any of the >>> optional pieces: KDE3 / KDE4 / GNOME etc. - but have a default of >>> auto-detection, so we only build if they are ther

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:15am -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, John Lee Castle wrote: any suggestions on a better code editor than gedit? Careful! Lest you start a flame war! (But we're all friends here. :-) I believe almost any *text* editor will suit you, provided you take the time to learn it's strengths and idiosy

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:12pm -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: The short answer is no, I'm not scared of "all future versions", but on principal, I will not blindly trust a document that I (no one!) have yet to see. Fair enough :-) We're still th

Re: [Libreoffice] "damaged" file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:48am -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: I -imagine- that most of the speedup came from ccache :-) And that gives a huge, but somewhat unpredictable speedup - depending which headers change - clearly with ccache you only do the pre-processing. Does distclean not remove the ccache

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam in security

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:56 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > yes, although I may ask later more explanation (I don't see the code > at this moment) cd clone/ure git grep osl_login And you'll see the places left to cleanup :-) Thanks, Michael. -- mi

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi John, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 06:15 -0700, John Lee Castle wrote: > First try at this ... single vcl patch attached. Great - thanks :-) > Fixed unit conversion table initialization so there are no more > compiler warnings and no more zero entries... Good catch. > Relevant chan

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:37 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable flag for any of the > > optional pieces: KDE3 / KDE4 / GNOME etc. - but have a default of > > auto-detection, so we only build if they are there. > > I disagree. Even if you had auto-

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on windows 7

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 09:09 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > This is mostly a guess, but are you running the build as Administrator (you > shouldn't) If this is the problem - we should probably detect in configure and fail early, if we don't already ;-) Regards, Mi

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kevin, On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > The short answer is no, I'm not scared of "all future versions", but on > principal, I will not blindly trust a document that I (no one!) have yet > to see. Fair enough :-) We're still thinking this through I guess. How

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal: looking for windows and MacOS build-tester

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Joseph Powers wrote: > I have 2 build errors so far on Mac OS X. > Thanks a lot for testing this. > > Connectivity is having issues with salhelper::SimpleReferenceObject > > > > > vcl is complaining about a missing class name in aqua/inc/salinst.h > I believe the

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam in security

2010-10-25 Thread Nadav Vinik
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Nadav, > > On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: >> Notice that I leave: > >        Thank for your patch :-) I removed the whole contents of > osl_psz_loginUser - as is done for several other Unix's. It would be > great as

Re: [Libreoffice] the basic macro editor

2010-10-25 Thread René Kjellerup
finally had time (although not to complete another build) to run the test again, the procedure I did was: Tools->Macros->Organize macros->basic select Main and click on the Edit button I've attached the back-trace of the crash René On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On

Re: [Libreoffice] "damaged" file: sysui's dummy/localize.sdf

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:32 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > > Yes, I'm aware I can change the CPU count, among other things, but > > this was my noob starting point. > > Wow, this *really* makes a difference. I would have thought it might > have halved the time, to about 2 hours. On the same hard

Re: [Libreoffice] oox compile failure ...

2010-10-25 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:52 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > I just got this: > > Compiling: oox/source/ppt/timenodelistcontext.cxx > Making:ppt.lib > Compiling: oox/source/ppt/dgmimport.cxx > In file included from > /data/opt/OpenOffice/HEAD/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/oox/source/ppt/dgmimport.c

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Wols, > > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:29 +0100, Wols Lists wrote: >> This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system >> compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off. > >        That sounds reasonable. > >> How do I

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam from config

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:06 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > While autogen.sh complete successfully with this patch, the make > didn't, there still pam configuration related in the code. > > last patch work and make finish compilation. Great. So; I've pushed your outer configure.in

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH] remove pam in security

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Nadav, On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > Notice that I leave: Thank for your patch :-) I removed the whole contents of osl_psz_loginUser - as is done for several other Unix's. It would be great as a follow-on patch to prune the contents of osl_loginUser as well in

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problem on windows 7

2010-10-25 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> I was going to patch it to do a 'tar --same-owner' instead, Hmm, you mean --no-same-owner? > but since > I'm not the first person to hit this, was wondering what the official > work-around is? This is mostly a guess, but are you running the build as Administrator (you shouldn't), or does Cygw

[Libreoffice] oox compile failure ...

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
I just got this: Compiling: oox/source/ppt/timenodelistcontext.cxx Making:ppt.lib Compiling: oox/source/ppt/dgmimport.cxx In file included from /data/opt/OpenOffice/HEAD/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/oox/source/ppt/dgmimport.cxx:31:0: ./../inc/oox/ppt/dgmimport.hxx:63:52: error: conflicting retu

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 9:03am -0400 Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 02:08 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: Oh, forever more, unless I explicitly say otherwise, it is safe to assume that my patches are all LGPLv3. (That's v3, not v3+.) But I'll try to remember to say it as well. We

Re: [Libreoffice] build failure loading pythonloader.uno.so

2010-10-25 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > In addition to the other sage advice; I would tend to recommend going > depth-first, and coming back to breadth. > > ie. get the build working / running with --disable-python. > > And then come back and fix this :-

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal: looking for windows and MacOS build-tester

2010-10-25 Thread Joseph Powers
I have 2 build errors so far on Mac OS X. Connectivity is having issues with salhelper::SimpleReferenceObject problematic_connectivity.log Description: Binary data vcl is complaining about a missing class name in aqua/inc/salinst.h problematic_vcl.log Description: Binary data Thanks, Jo

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:46:25PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system > > compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off. > > That sounds reasonable. ACK. > My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable fl

Re: [Libreoffice] How can I speed up a build?

2010-10-25 Thread Mattias Johnsson
Thanks guys - I've got it all working pretty efficiently now. The --with-max-jobs=4 option works a *lot* better than the --with-num-cpus flag on my box (Core i5, four cores / eight threads). A clean build takes a bit over an hour, but most changes now only require a couple of minutes for the build,

Re: [Libreoffice] the basic macro editor

2010-10-25 Thread John Lee Castle
>From: Michael Meeks [michael.me...@novell.com] > :-) > Nasty - some sort of python conflict; > Ok - so this should not be a fatal error ... > Tried setting breaks and traces but nothing new >break _exit >break exit > > and re-run - and get a trace from the exit call ? :-) I tried this a

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] tiny first patch - fix 32 bit overflow at compile

2010-10-25 Thread John Lee Castle
Hi, First try at this ... single vcl patch attached. Fixed unit conversion table initialization so there are no more compiler warnings and no more zero entries... Relevant changes below, dont know where all the +/- blank lines came from, any suggestions on a better code editor than gedit? =

Re: [Libreoffice] Minor translation, commented code removal

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kevin, On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 02:08 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Oh, forever more, unless I explicitly say otherwise, it is safe to > assume that my patches are all LGPLv3. (That's v3, not v3+.) But I'll > try to remember to say it as well. We prefer LGPLv3+ with an open-ness to an

Re: [Libreoffice] How can I speed up a build?

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Mattias, On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 13:15 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: > it seems that everything is rebuilt which takes hours, even if only a > few files have changed. As Norbert says - this may be down to low-level header changes, which have a big trickle-down effect on build-times (sor

[Libreoffice] [gitdm-lo-config PATCH] speed up an improve merging of logs

2010-10-25 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi Cedric, I'm attaching a patch that speeds up running merge-log for me. See the commit message for details. Here are the times on my machine: ~/git/libreoffice/clone$ time ~/git/gitdm-lo-config/merge-log > log real1m15.034s user0m46.174s sys 0m12.736s After applying the patch: ~/gi

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal: looking for windows and MacOS build-tester

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 19:11 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I've pushed an updated version of the feature/vos-removal branch > At this point vos is no more, and I build and 'smoketest' successfully > in rawbuild on Linux x86_64 Great work ! :-) /me does a little dance on the grave of VOS

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Wols Lists wrote: > Resubmit with brackets in subject - I think I need them for the > patchmeister to pick up? > Thanks a lot for the fix, pushed! -- Thorsten pgpvML4yXRas7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Wols, On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:29 +0100, Wols Lists wrote: > This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system > compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off. That sounds reasonable. > How do I update the develop page on the web ? There's a bunch of useful >

Re: [Libreoffice] Where should I edit the code? in clone or build directory?

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 02:22 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:22:20AM +0200, Nadav Vinik > wrote: > > Currently I edit the code in the clone dir and then use meld to copy > > the changes to build/libreoffice* Heh :-) I do something like that too. Just be aware that

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice I start

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jean, On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 20:49 +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > find command finds the file libstlport_gcc.so in /usr and in /opt (I > installed deb package on Document Coundation website libreoffice-ure..., > and I let Debian official OOo on the system). But it seems > that /opt/libreo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix compilation of icu for VC++ 10

2010-10-25 Thread Jesús Corrius
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Isn't that wrong? Assuming there are non-Windows platforms where the bundled > ICU is used (generic Linux build, other Unixes?), previously that  #include >  has been used on all of them, but after your change it will be > used only on MS

Re: [Libreoffice] Installing LibreOffice extensions

2010-10-25 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> I think it'd be nice to allow the user choose what extensions [s]he wants to > install But isn't that the case already? Aren't the individual extensions de-selectable if one chooses the "custom" installation? Sure, I guess it could be argued that we should have a clever custom action that wo

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove pam from config

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:06 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > While autogen.sh complete successfully with this patch, the make > didn't, there still pam configuration related in the code. > > last patch work and make finish compilation. Yep - there needs to be some cleanup in sal/ to make that

Re: [Libreoffice] build failure loading pythonloader.uno.so

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thomas, On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:03 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > My latest build failure is: > Entering > /disk/2/archive/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/pyuno/source/loader In addition to the other sage advice; I would tend to recommend going depth-first, and coming back to

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix compilation of icu for VC++ 10

2010-10-25 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Isn't that wrong? Assuming there are non-Windows platforms where the bundled ICU is used (generic Linux build, other Unixes?), previously that #include has been used on all of them, but after your change it will be used only on MSVC versions earlier than 10. Or is that OK, is the functional

Re: [Libreoffice] the basic macro editor

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:20 -0700, LeMoyne wrote: > This is a bit different than the editor crash but I am experiencing this > sudden exit in a fresh build. :-) > 3) Exits with result in terminal:: > /home/ ... /program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: /home/ ... > /program/..

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] sfx2: Simplify "About" dialog

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 09:11 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > Go to the about box and hold CTRL and type sdt. I'd be sad to loose > > that :-( Definitely be nice to tidy up the about dialog, but can we > > rework that to retain the about scrolling. > OK, I did not know about that easter egg and

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

2010-10-25 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:40:34AM -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Have you enumerated everywhere this is used (in the code base). At > the moment, I'm having a difficult time seeing the use (both > logically and usefully) of a macro that defines a single space. At > the point you're basically castr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] OSL_* macros in writer/sw/source/ui

2010-10-25 Thread Jacek Wolszczak
Sorry about these errors. Will be more careful about such things in the future. Nevertheless, I did compile LibreOffice successfully yesterday after a long trying, so it was rejoiced :) 2010/10/25 Luke Symes > Actually, I am running into lots of small errors, missing semicolons > mostly. Attach

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] sfx2: Simplify "About" dialog

2010-10-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:37:32 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > But the scolling in the about dialog is one of those cunning neato sort > of easter egg things. > > Go to the about box and hold CTRL and type sdt. I'd be sad to loose > that :-( Definitely be nice to tidy up the about dialog, but can w