On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > Hi Wols, > > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:29 +0100, Wols Lists wrote: >> This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system >> compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off. > > That sounds reasonable. > >> How do I update the develop page on the web ? There's a bunch of useful >> stuff I'd like to document to make life easier for the next person who >> wants to fix a "won't build" problem (whether a global default or a >> personal setup). > > So - the 'develop' page is in the 'website' git repository (which is > un-necessarly huge last time I looked) - so I'll mail you a snapshot > separately. > > I would -really- like to avoid the develop page becoming huge and > bloated - so, some links for each section into an equivalent section of > the wiki - would be great. Particularly for transient build issues: the > website is not -that- easy to update, and the wiki is easier. Does that > make sense ? [ do add some links and send in a diff ]. > >> diff --git a/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf.in >> b/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf.in >> index a8df1e0..58b9e8d 100644 >> --- a/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf.in >> +++ b/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf.in >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> --with-vendor=\"The Document Foundation\" >> --disable-dbus >> ---disable-kde4 >> +--enable-kde4 > > so - really I would like to avoid this. > > My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable flag for any of the > optional pieces: KDE3 / KDE4 / GNOME etc. - but have a default of > auto-detection, so we only build if they are there.
humm... Just because it is available (or the build system _think_ it's avaialable) on your build machine, doesn't mean your target will have it. I'd agree that the default should be to automatically pick-up what is there... but at least the disable flag should stay. Norbert > > This will need some code changes to configure.in [ not the one in > build/ but the one in bootstrap ], and a little autoconf knowledge. > However it should solve the problem for lots of people. > > Any chance you could look at that instead ? > > Thanks, > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
