Michael Meeks wrote: > The Document Foundation (as/when it exists) being your > 'proxy' for future versions ?
Even though I'm not personally involved, this seems to be an interesting suggestion, although as Kevin noticed it could become similar to copyright assignments/agreements - which have been refused by The Document Foundation since day one, but are not inherently bad in my opinion: see my early comments at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/msg00533.html > I still tend to > (for all its faults) think that a plus license has some real strengths > for future re-licensing. Well, in the current situation LibreOffice will have to use LGPL3 until it has got rid of the OpenOffice.org code, which is not feasible nor desirable for the time being. Unless of course Oracle change their mind... But I guess this discussion would quickly outgrow the legal considerations one is allowed to make on a developers' mailing list! Best regards, Andrea Pescetti. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
