On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:40:34AM -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Have you enumerated everywhere this is used (in the code base). At > the moment, I'm having a difficult time seeing the use (both > logically and usefully) of a macro that defines a single space. At > the point you're basically castrating that macro, why not just > remove it entirely? > > As they say, "code removed is code debugged," and we've already > experienced some confusion over the handling of the use-related > __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ non-macro.
I'd like to get some feedback if someone is interested in converting this to use the language identifiers before making it harder by removing the macro completely. A short grep shows it is used in clone/ure/sal/inc/osl/diagnose.h clone/writer/sw/source/filter/ww8/ (multiple files) rawbuild/writerfilter/source/filter/RtfFilter.cxx patches/dev300/oox-import-comments-fix-add-annotation.diff If there's consensus, I can remove it completely. Thomas _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice