Hi Michael, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > Soo ... I hate EPM ;-) not sure if that is a universal feeling, but it > certainly fouls up the compilation, deps and smoke-testing process.
Well - never did play foul on any of the tinderboxes/buildslaves. > Do we use EPM for building the generic Linux builds though ? and if so, > should we ? ;-) and/or is that hyper-useful for tinderboxes / etc. ? In > general I'd prefer to default to --disable-epm anyway. What makes the packaging complicated is not epm, it is the huge perl-stuff that is surrounding it. (not because it is perl, but that it is overengineered, more complicated than necessary, etc.) So whether you call epm <epm'slistfile> or rpmbuld -bb <rpmspecfile> doesn't make a real difference to me. The way how that epmlistfile/the specfile is created is. my 0,02€ ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
