Followed the instructions in 5.7.
when I run make from the glib-build directory I get this:
fs@lfshost /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build $ make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
What am I doing wrong?
Please help.
Bob S.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
From: Bruce Dubbs
To: LFS Support List
Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2012 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] prerequisites
Robert Cox wrote:
> communication skills are a personal weakness, please allow me to
> elaborate further... LOL
Yes, I se
localmodconfig" does this action "append" the .config file or make a new one?
P.S. thanks for your generous effort in my behalf.
tw3ak
____
From: B
hello,
Wow lots to learn, I have little computer background and no formal
computer training I'm self taught.
I'm a bit stuck... menuconfig.. and the file .config coping over my distro's
config file to .config in the build directory then loading it to menuconfig
making additional cha
going thru the prerequisites again and decided to build a custom kernel for my
distro.
linux gets confusing because of the independent thinking both good and bad...
1. distro call for debian is export cpu flags and so on... and the straight
build is j4 or +1 or all the virtual cpu's depends
I was and am only an average Linux user . You guys roughed me up a bit but you
got me through a build. Took me like 25 or more tries but I completed the
build. Tw3ak. Thanks--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
thanks
From: Tiago Barros
To: LFS Support List
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] live cd
I built LFS 7.0 using the Gentoo Live DVD (version 12, if I remember well). No
problems.
--
智亞護
計算機工學之學生
--
http://linuxfromscratc
ok ,
there's a big red notice on the live cd page don't use on 7.0 I see
the script and my distro seems to need many changes... could someone be kinnd
enough to give me a hint as to what live cd might work? thanks in advance
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
My thanks to Firerat and DJ Lucas. I am well on my way -- I have
successfully built gingerbread-release and run it in a target!
DJ> IMO, the biggest pain of building android is learning to use the repo
DJ> script instead of git by itself.
Yes, that is the thing I'm still a bit fuzzy on. How do
Hi. I have previously built LFS and used the LFS Live CD project to
create a custom system (back in the 6.3 / 6.4 days).
I am now engaged in a project for a client using Android on a custom
embedded system. As you may know, Android uses the Linux kernel as a
base.
Has anyone out there built And
>Bruce Dubbs gmail.com> writes:
>
> File can use zlib, but what you should have from ./configure in Chapter
> 5 is:
>
> checking zlib.h usability... no
> checking zlib.h presence... no
> checking for zlib.h... no
> ...
> checking for gzopen in -lz... no
>
> It looks like you didn't set up your
William Immendorf gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Casey Daniels - lfs cd.kcfam.net>
wrote:
> > /media/lfs/sources/file-5.04/src/.libs/lt-file: error while loading shared
> > libraries: libz.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> > directory
> Is there so
In 2009 I customized the LFS Live CD to build a bootable demonstration
application. The Live CD includes makefiles that do the full build.
You do a single "make" and hours later an .iso file pops out.
The last release of the live CD corresponded to LFS 6.3. I updated
the particular components I
On 08/05/2011 05:30 PM, Andrew Elian wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:41:15AM -0500, robert wrote:
>> Any suggestions?
>> I'm working at 6.22. Coreutils-8.10
>>
>> ==
>> 1 of 15 tests failed
>&g
Any suggestions?
I'm working at 6.22. Coreutils-8.10
==
1 of 15 tests failed
(8 tests were not run)
See tests/test-suite.log
Please report to bug-coreut...@gnu.org
==
make[4]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving dire
sr/sbin \
> /bin/bash --login
then ...
$grub-mkdevicemap --device-map=device.map
$cat device.map ...
file device.map is empty!
Suggestions help chastisement appreciated.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
vi. Prerequisites
link seems to be broken ...
#
"The Linux Users' Guide http://www.linuxhq.com/guides/LUG/guide.html
This guide covers the usage of assorted Linux software. This reference is also
fairly old, but still valid."
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
Serious errors? are these the errors noted
"Note that 2 tests are known to fail as they rely on warnings output from
Groff,
which changed slightly in Groff-1.21."
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/man-db-2.5.9/src/tests'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/man-db-2.5.9/src/tests'
make[2]:
On 06/22/2011 04:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> robert wrote:
>> 6.36. Bzip2-1.0.6 works fine until I reach instruction:
>> rm -v /usr/bin/{bunzip2,bzcat,bzip2}
>>
>> re-ran the sequence and stopped just before this command; checked /usr/bin
>> for
>> bunzip
?
Thanks in advance for comments.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
/usr/local/lib")
>> SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
>> SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib");
>>
>> attempt to open /lib/libc.so.6 succeeded
>> found ld-linux.so.2 at /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>
> Looks like your toolchain is set up properly. I would suggest that you
>
I've reposted this ... previous post possibly lost with earlier similarly
titled
thread.
Original Message
Subject: 6.16. GCC-4.5.2
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:36:04 -0500
From: robert
To: LFS Support List
This is disconcerting. While results seem to be "acceptable&q
On 06/20/2011 09:14 AM, Eric Plummer wrote:
> robert wrote:
>> as per instruction at 3.2 All packages ...
>>
>> wget ftp://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/pub/pkg-shadow/shadow-4.1.4.3.tar.bz2
>> --2011-06-20 08:45:32--
>> ftp://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/pub/
bian.org... 217.196.43.134
Connecting to pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org|217.196.43.134|:21... failed:
Connection refused.
further, a visit to http://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/ reveals nothing of
note
for shadow-4.1.4.3.tar.bz2
suggestions? proceed with shadow-4.1.4.2.tar.bz2???
thanks.
On 06/16/2011 05:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> robert wrote:
>> cannot get beyond this:
>>
>> make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
>> make: *** [check] Error 2
>> make[2]: [/sourc
On 06/16/2011 02:37 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
> robert wrote:
>> cannot get beyond this:
>>
>> make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1'
>> make: *** [check] Error 2
>> make[2]: [/sourc
r 1
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock2.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2
any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
perhaps go back and run version-check.sh?
Anand Arumugam wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The machine in which I am trying to get LFS built was running the latest
> version of debian. But I changed the distro to Xubuntu 10.10 while
> retaining the /mnt/lfs partition. I was not able to login to /mnt/lfs
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> robert wrote these words on 01/20/11 15:32 CST:
>> /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0/ipv4 NOW READS:
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> SERVICE=ipv4-static
>> IP=192.168.1.100
>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
>> PREFIX=24
>> BROADCAST=192.168.1
/etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0/ipv4 NOW READS:
ONBOOT=yes
SERVICE=ipv4-static
IP=192.168.1.100
GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
PREFIX=24
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
boot now yields:
Bringing up eth0 interface ...
... sky2 :03:00.0: eth0: enabling interface
ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is
Direct cable from Westell DSL router to network connection on box.
boot up ...
Bringing up eth0 interface ...
... sky2 :03:00.0: eth0: enabling interface
ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
Adding IPv4 address 10.0.0.2 to the eth0 interface ... [ OK ]
setting up default gateway ...
Drew Ames wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/12/2010 08:28 PM, robert wrote:
>> Someday of course I'll be able to add only known quantities after the
>> "fresh" build and thereby keep the whole thing smartly clean
>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Two thoughts (as someone who creates his own scripts to do this).
> First, give some thought to catching error messages (e.g. by logging
> stderr), whilst remembering that every script you create will bring
> its own new bugs.
>
> Second, and more importantly, the perfect is
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 16:22 CST:
>> Any precautionary notes before I light out for the wilderness?
>
> Why reinvent the wheel? An automated system to build LFS already exists!
> Instead of simply doing boring work adding together the comma
No small sense of accomplishment attaches to having "finished" up this
project. Of course, this cannot be anywhere near as gratifying as
having actually put together this little project. Many people no doubt
involved. A warm "gracias" "merci beaucoup" "danke" to all of you.
As I believe I me
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 12:43 CST:
>> Suddenly, I suspected that to be the problem ... maybe
>> not. In any case, I've one terminal and only one tab ... chroot.
>> Things seem to be going swimmingly ... until this -npl -Npl
Mike Hollis wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:37:33AM -0600, Robert Mullin wrote:
>> root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
>> root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
>> root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
>> patch: Only garbage w
root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
What's gone wrong? I've downloaded the patches anew twice ... no luck.
--
http://linuxfromscr
Plodding back through my build once again, altogether pleased with
revisiting my old friends, binutils and gcc and linux, I wonder, is
there a way to run a very simple test on these installs.
I know of course that we have the elaborate screens full of testing as
we move along, but is there not
Stuart Stegall wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 06:31:31PM -0600, robert wrote:
>>>
>>> No, I got the "me hopes" part ... quite Shakespearean, in fact ... as in
>>> methinks ...
>>>
>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:46:00PM -0600, robert wrote:
>> .config of host reveals: # CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set
>> gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3
>> glibc: libc-2.11.1.so
>> kernel: vmlinuz-2.6.32-26-generic
> Those seem adequate
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:48:22PM -0600, robert wrote:
>> Thanks everyone for the help. I do have /dev/sda5:
>> /dev/sda5: UUID="a6ce6f3f-7bb5-4069-a32c-a8388472f15d" TYPE="ext3"
>>
> You write English well, but I wonder if yo
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:13:58PM -0600, robert wrote:
>> pastebin URL:
>> http://pastebin.com/6jaJfxeP
>
> Test 31 (add) - test labelled "Program with subshell"
>
> plus the 'error as expected' messages for 81, 82.
>
&
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:12:52AM -0600, robert wrote:
>> Partial output of make check:
>>
>> make --no-print-directory check-recursive
>> Making check in .
>> make --no-print-directory libudev/test-libudev udev/test-udev
>> make[3
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Stuart Stegall wrote:
>
>>> udev-test will run 142 tests:
>>>
>>> FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
>>> ==
>>> 1 of 1 test failed
>
> My system has error as expected for tests 1, 48, 81, 82, 139, 140, and
> 141 for udev-161.
>
> 0 errors oc
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:18:17PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:13:19PM -0600, robert wrote:
>>> In other matters, I'm setting up another machine to step thru the LFS
>>> build ... don't know what else to do.
&
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:13:19PM -0600, robert wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is
>>> not 'j'. I assume you wrote it as a capital for more emphasis, but
&
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0600, robert wrote:
>> So, I don't follow then. Instructions at > 6.59. Udev-161
>> say: tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2 ...
>> why not *J*xvf?
>
> Apart from the other responses, I can't h
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> robert wrote:
>> Neal Murphy wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote:
>>>> unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2
>>>> cd udev-161
>>>> then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are "xvf"???
Mike Hollis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:55:43AM -0600, robert wrote:
>>> Mike H.-
>> jumped back out to "root" user
>> asserted root:root for /tools (verified)
>>
>> still at "root":
>> copy and paste everything from
Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote:
>> unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2
>> cd udev-161
>> then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are "xvf"??? and
>> not "jxvf"???
>
> 'tar xvf' unpacks
just did the build at host level:
works fine.
any suggestions?
[X] make check
make --no-print-directory check-recursive
Making check in .
make --no-print-directory libudev/test-libudev udev/test-udev
CC libudev/test-libudev.o
CCLD libudev/test-libudev
CC udev/test-udev.o
CC
Mike Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:39:13PM -0600, robert wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> robert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does this mean, then, that I am supposed to receive the message:
>>>> FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
>>> Do you have
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> robert wrote:
>
>> Does this mean, then, that I am supposed to receive the message:
>> FAIL: test/udev-test.pl
>
> Do you have the filesystems mounted in the chroot environment? (Section
> 6.2.3)
>
>-- Bruce
yes, in chroot enviro
6.59.1 says, in part:
Create some devices and directories that Udev cannot handle due to them
being required very early in the boot process, or by Udev itself:
$install -dv /lib/{firmware,udev/devices/{pts,shm}}
$mknod -m0666 /lib/udev/devices/null c 1 3
Does this mean, then, that I am supposed
@vger.kernel.org
==
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
I've stepped back through it numerous times to catch an operator error.
No luck. Any suggestions?
Daryl Lee wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 11:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Daryl Lee wrote:
>>> I am off and running with my newly repartitioned drive and have
>>> something to report, but not sure where to send it, so here goes.
>>>
>>> I'm using version 6.7 of the LFS book, and one of the files in wget-lis
follow-up on previous post ...
booted to grub prompt
grub>ls ... revealed that hd2,4 is the proper partition
grub>set root=(hd2,4)
grub>linux /boot/vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 ... tab-completion provided
this, so I'm certainly using the correct partition
grub> boot ... produces some sweet whirrin
Near the finish line.
I've added a 41_lfs file to /etc/grub.d on my host system
41_lfs contains:
#!/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
menuentry "lfs" {
set root=(hd1,4)
linux /boot/vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7
}
$update-grub
returns:
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.
Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 03.12.2010 13:26, schrieb robert:
>> ./common: line 25: sed: command not found
>
> Thats your problem again: Check your sed installation.
>
>
> Regards Andr�
yep! thanks.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
follow up:
building outside of chroot works fine ...???
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
tar zxf pkg-config-0.25.tar.gz
cd pkg-config-0.25
sed -i -e 's/XT])dnl/XT])[]dnl/' -e 's/\.])dnl/\.])[]dnl/' pkg.m4
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
make check ... yields:
FAIL: check-conflicts
./common: line 25: sed: command not found
./common: line 25: sed: command not found
./common: line 25: sed
What do you think? Looks to me like I slipped right over 6.17.
Sed-4.2.1 ... did not get sed installed???!!
I'm at 8.3. Linux-2.6.35.4
cp source tarball into sources directory
de-archive it.
change into linux dir
root:/sources/linux-2.6.36.1# make mrproper
/bin/sh: sed: command not found
Makefi
I'm at 8.3. Linux-2.6.35.4
cp source tarball into sources directory
de-archive it.
change into linux dir
root:/sources/linux-2.6.36.1# make mrproper
/bin/sh: sed: command not found
Makefile:543: /sources/linux-2.6.36.1/arch//Makefile: No such file or
directory
make: *** No rule to make target
`/s
Now then, at 7.8. The Bash Shell Startup Files
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale language
English
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale charmap
UTF-8
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale int_curr_symbol
USD
root:/# LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale int_prefix
1
so now, do I modify /etc/profile to match these values
2
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
I've stepped back through it four times to catch an operator error.
Any suggestions?
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:11 -0600, robert wrote:
>> What has gone wrong? Am I supposed to cd /sources/linux-2.6.36.1 and
>> then $make mrproper?
>
> Yes - remember the "General Compilation Instructions":
>
> 3. For each packa
case, for, after having done so, the
little box whirred prettily and produced the following messages:
CLEAN scripts/basic
CLEAN scripts
CLEAN usr/include
CLEAN include/linux/version.h
How 'bout it. Is that correct?
Thanks in advance.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscra
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:48:15 -0600
> robert wrote:
>
>> Events moving along swimmingly until this point:
>>
>> 6.7.1. Installation of Linux API Headers
>>
>> The Linux kernel needs to expose an Application Programming Interface
>
at /usr/src I find linux-headers ... directories
issuing make mrproper elicits some response ...
is that what I should be doing? entering each directory and
$make mrproper
e.g.
r...@acer1:/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-24-generic# make mrproper
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-24-generic/drivers/st
Events moving along swimmingly until this point:
6.7.1. Installation of Linux API Headers
The Linux kernel needs to expose an Application Programming Interface
(API) for the system's C library (Glibc in LFS) to use. This is done by
way of sanitizing various C header files that are shipped in th
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:11:22PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> robert wrote:
>>> working on the Expect build at
>>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/expect.html
>>>
>>> instructions say:
>>> &quo
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> robert wrote:
>
>> I have a fairly good "beginner's" grasp of the compile/build procedure.
>> And yes, I refer often to 5.3.
>
> Until you get the hang of things, I suggest having three windows open.
>
> 1.
Mike Hollis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:11:57AM -0600, robert wrote:
>> from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
>> $patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
>>
>> yields:
>> patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at
ising, but the directions are on
several occasions quite vague.
I am taking rather fastidiously accurate notes as I move through the
build process and will share those areas of "vagueness" in the future.
Thanks for your attention.
robert
William Immendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 a
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
yields:
patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c.rej
patching file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sys
search-engining about a bit ... seems I need to tar the linux source ...
which did
moved into the resulting /mnt/lfs/source/linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$make mrproper
ran without error
is that the correct procedure?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.lin
moving on to 5.6. Linux-2.6.35.4 API Headers
in gcc-build directory ...
$make mrproper
make: *** No rule to make target `mrproper'. Stop.
tried same command in gcc-4.5.1 & sources & tools & /mnt/lfs directories
... same error
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: htt
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:40 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii.
>
> Just a reminder, Bruce - pages are only numbered on the page itself, not
> in the table of contents. Referring to the "Host System Requirements
nt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/mpc'
make[1]: *** [all-mpc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lf
Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 25.11.2010 03:48, schrieb robert:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii.
>>>
>>>-- Bruce
>>>
>> section vii. chapter vii.??
>>
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> - wiped all the directories clean ... tools/ & sources/
>> - fresh extract of binutils from within /mnt/lfs/sources/
>> - moved into newly-created binutils-2.20.1 directory
>> - $mkdir ../binutils-build
>> - $cd ../binutils-build
>>
>> prepared for compilation
>> - $../binuti
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:21:14PM -0600, amalafrida wrote:
>> make yields the following message ... should I be concerned?
>>
>> ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: error: 'LANG_TYPE' undeclared (first
>> use in this function)
>> ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: warning: comparis
What, in general, should I expect from "make" command? A success
notification? Exit code 0? How about this ... fatal?
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
Arrived at step 5.5.1, Installation of Cross GCC.
I am using "LFS-BOOK-6.7-HTML/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html"
I have unpacked the mpfr, gmp, and mpc tarballs and renamed the
resulting directories as instructed
I created /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build directory
then, cd /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build
I issu
16 -0400
> Neal Murphy wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 11 July 2010 21:33:23 Robert Whitcomb wrote:
> > > Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now
> > > I am running into another issue:
> > >
> > > /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/l
Running env | grep LFS_TGT while logged on as the lfs user gives me
i686-lfs-linux-gnu.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Sunday 11 July 2010 21:33:23 Robert Whitcomb wrote:
> > Thanks very much for your help, the CC value was set wrong. But now I am
> &g
6 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Sunday 11 July 2010 10:21:53 littlebat wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 08:48:28 -0400
> >
> > Robert Whitcomb wrote:
> > > checking for
> > > i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
> >
> > in Se
Greetings all,
I am running into some issues regarding section 5.10.1 of the current stable
version of the book. When attempting to build gcc, I receive the following
error:
Checking multilib configuration for libgomp...
Configuring in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgomp
configure: loading cache ./config
> whoa...THAT's what I need I think.
>
> can you post an iso of that cd so I can use it as a reference?
OK, you can fetch:
http://msbit.com/osdv/sample-grub.iso
It is grub plus the Ubuntu 9.04 kernel. You can interrupt the boot
sequence and edit the kernel line to specify the desired root
What I have done is to build a grub CD that also includes copies of
the kernel and initrd from the desired root device. Grub can then use
the same BIOS I/O to start the kernel and the kernel will have the
device support for the BIOS-inaccessible root device.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
I built a customized (somewhat stripped, then other things added) LFS
back in April, 2009. It's based on the 6.3 LFS live CD with packages
updated to the 6.4 book (current at the time).
The LFS live CD is a very good starting point. I haven't explored
other (even more stripped) alternatives like
own if you like.
4. I 'hid' them in /usr/bin but you could put them in / directory
and invoke /logir /rch
.
Enjoy(?) and regards Robert C. Hansen
Bob
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
r-v-r> Now I would like to create my own bootable lfs-cd. My question
r-v-r> is: How to do it.
I recently built a custom LFS live CD for the Open Source Digital
Voting Foundation. I updated the live CD makefiles to reflect LFS 6.4
(plus a few other changes) and added an application program (Pvote
you are in the wrong location of the file tree probably maybe only one . not
two..?
--- On Fri, 9/25/09, aztec...@comcast.net wrote:
From: aztec...@comcast.net
Subject: stuck at part 5.4 in the manual
To: "Linux From Scratch"
Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 3:05 PM
#yiv1650758092 p {margin
There's an LFS hint describing how to boot LFS without requiring a
separate partition (i.e., in the same file system as another operating
system).
The trick is a special "pre-init" program that does a chroot early in
the boot process (automatically, rather than manually as Russell
Stockhammer sugg
> I like the idea behind LFS and would like to explore all of the
> options. LFS offers better control over the process.
LFS is an excellent project and I think it will suit your needs as a
starting point; as Ken Moffat points out, you will have some further
work to do on cross-platform developme
I ran my build and found one minor glitch: links to fetch tcl and
e2fsprogs from sourceforge have changed.
(If someone knows the right way to make a permanent sourceforge link,
please tell me. :-)
Here is a patch to fix it. "cd /mnt/newlfs/newlfs-livecd; patch -p0 <
lfs-sourceforge-patch"
lfs-s
A warning about my OSDV LFS Live CD:
My build structure is a little fragile due to my adding the Pvote
application and making the live CD automatically run the demo (that
was the purpose of my exercise).
The default target in my master Makefile is "osdv-iso", the live Pvote
demo CD. The "iso" ta
> I need help for making LFS bootable iso.
> I have already googled about how making an bootable iso but i have no
> idea how should i process -_-
> If some one did it yet, please i need to know all the steps.
> Thanks.
I recently built a custom LFS live CD for the Open Source Digital
Voting Found
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
