Apols if this is the wrong list to send to.
Ref new eudev hint:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/eudev-alt-hint.txt
A few typos:
--
* "and it's manpages:"
s/it's/its/
* "For it's brief time"
s/it's/its/
* s/utilzied/utilized/
((Or even 'utilised'; but that'
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 14:27:12 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] linuxfromscratch.org web site
>
> > Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:16:24 -0400
> > From: baho utot
> > To: LFS Suppor
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:16:24 -0400
> From: baho utot
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: [lfs-support] linuxfromscratch.org web site
>
> I am in the process of collecting information on usinf eudev in my rpm
> lfs builds I have found a broken link on the
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hin
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 16:39:19 +0100
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] EXT3-fs (sda4): error: couldn't mount because of
> unsupported optional features (240) , during kernel boot
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:31:51AM -0700, Golam Md. Shibly wrote:
> > Hi,
> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:44:18 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] EXT3-fs (sda4): error: couldn't mount because of
> unsupported optional features (240) , during kernel boot
>
> > From lfs-support-bou
> From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Fri Apr 4 15:34:19 2014
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 07:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Golam Md. Shibly"
> To: "lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org"
> Subject: [lfs-support] EXT3-fs (sda4): error: couldn't mount because of
> unsupported optional features
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:59:38 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LSF Package wget
>
.
.
> to see it if you log wget's run - '-o dwnld.log' or shell redirections.
- or '-a dw
> From: "Mcgroder, James"
> To: "lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org"
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:05:27 +
> Subject: [lfs-support] LSF Package wget
>
> Working through my 1st LFS build and wget seems to have missed some files
> listed in the wget-list file. I got the wget-list from
> ftp://ft
> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:32:13 -0400
> From: baho utot
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?
>
> On 03/22/2014 10:08 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> > On 03/22/2014 02:59 PM, baho utot wrote:
.
.
> >> I would like to adhere to Filesyst
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:26:46 -0800
> From: "Waitman Gobble"
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] creating binutils-build again
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Version 7.5-rc1
>
> In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v ../binutils-build",
No it doesn't: it says 'mkdir
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of sys
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:41:16 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> On 02/16/2014 02:55 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> >> From:
nly offer my system
> resources for (test)building development versions - much as what I do today.
>
Again, there's the sysd-lfs branch. Were you aware of that?
hth,
akhiezer
> Regards, Frans.
> --
>
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:35:55 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Wrong package installed - how to fix?
>
.
.
> >>
> >> bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
> >> /bin/sh -> /bin/dash
>
> You have:
>
> ls -l /bin/sh
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 r
bian 4.6.3-14) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.2.51-1
> m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16
> GNU Make 3.81
> patch 2.6.1
> Perl version='5.14.2';
> GNU sed version 4.2.1
> tar (GNU tar) 1.26
> ./v_check.sh: line 34: makeinfo: command not found
> Texinfo:
> xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.0alpha
> g++ comp
Please don't top-post; it makes following the discussion unnecessarily awkward.
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:01:20 +0530
> From: Oshadha Gunawardena
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Wrong package installed - how to fix?
>
>
>
> I have started the build process but it seems li
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:19:22 +0530
> From: Oshadha Gunawardena
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: [lfs-support] Wrong package installed - how to fix?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have started building my second LFS system but ran in to a trouble. I
> have compiled and installed wrong Binutils packag
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:50:02 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libstdc++-4.8.1
>
> > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:17:42 -0600
> > From: Louis Rine
> > To: LFS Support List
> > Subject
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:17:42 -0600
> From: Louis Rine
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libstdc++-4.8.1
>
Louis,
In case you've not already seen it: there may be a solution to the issue
you're seeing:
Enrique Larraia
Wed Jan 22 21:47
Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libs
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:17:42 -0600
> From: Louis Rine
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libstdc++-4.8.1
>
.
.
>
> Anyway, as for those sanity checks:
>
> $ ls -laF /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib
> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 5204187 Jan 17 18:29
> /to
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:47:42 -0600
> From: Louis Rine
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libstdc++-4.8.1
>
> If this is the correct use of ldd...
>
> :~$ ldd /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffa837b000)
> libz.so.1 =>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:37:16 -0600
> From: Louis Rine
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8 Libstdc++-4.8.1
>
>
> I ran the build again after fixing /bin/sh to be a link to /bin/bash. I
> formatted the lfs partition and re-downloaded the sources before running
> the build a
> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:52:41 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
>
> Em 07-01-2014 10:23, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> > Em 07-01-2014 09:39, akhiezer escreveu:
> >>> D
l-known packages.
Some aux refs in case of use/interest:
* ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware64-14.1/source/a/tree/
* https://github.com/execjosh/tree
rgds,
akhiezer
> --
> []s,
> Fernando
> --
>
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-suppor
> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:31:39 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
>
> > From: "Parmenides"
> > To:
> > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:10:55 +0800
> >
> From: "Parmenides"
> To:
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:10:55 +0800
> Subject: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure whether I should ask this quesiton here. I am trying
> 'diff' and 'patch', and have encounter a problem.
>
> I have create two directories as
> From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Dec 25 16:49:33 2013
> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 10:44:38 -0500
> From: Bob Elgie
> To: lfs-support
> Subject: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 Patching Perl
>
>
>
> My apologies if I'm blindly overlooking something obvious.
>
> Among the patches needed to bu
://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/systemd/
>
> Please allow it at least 12 hours to regenerate and include my latest
> changes.
>
Those urls both still seem to be saying 'SYTEMD-20131210', and have e.g.
changelog only up 'til that date; while trac indicates chan
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:00:11 -0600
> From: Dan McGhee
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 - Chapter 8.4 - GRUB
>
.
.
> >>>
> >> You and I have similar attitudes, esp with regard to the "M-word." :)
> >> From the
> >> research I did I concluded that t
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:44:17 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 - Chapter 8.4 - GRUB
>
.
.
>
> The trick for grub users is to get it to "look across" the
> > partitions without having to have a "signed" grub.efi file. And as
> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:39:03 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
> > Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:05:51 +
> > From
> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:05:51 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
.
.
> >
> > lfs-6.7 and lfs-6.8 both
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:49:59 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
.
.
> >
> > Could you put the following
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:41:03 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:17 +
> > From
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:17 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
.
.
> > I now have strace logs for both the
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:12:49 +
> From: Hazel Russman
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
> On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:13:08 +
> lf...@cruzi
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:29:05 +
> From: Hazel Russman
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
- apols for the delay in resuming.
> > * can you post the output, please, of each of:
>
> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 19:38:39 +
> From: Hazel Russman
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
.
.
> >
> I have now established that gmp was never installed on my host sys
, at 5:14 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>
> > - r u _trolling_ ?
>
> No, I've used slackware since version 3, and I'm a developer of CLFS
> and help with LFS support.
You've used Slackware since version 3 and you don't know where rc.sshd is
called from, a
since 13.37, but since 14.0 there have been
> some issues.
- PEBKAC?
>
.
.
>
rgds,
akhiezer
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:08:56 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
.
.
> > I have tried two experimental builds.
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:23:54 +0100
> From: Hazel Russman
> To: lfs support
> Subject: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for libgmp.la
> in the wrong place
>
> I am trying to build a 64-bit lfs-7.4 system using a host system based
> on Slackware-14. Currently I am having a
> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:40:23 +
> From: Hazel Russman
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] GCC build first pass: mpc build looks for
> libgmp.la in the wrong place
>
.
.
> I was also able to trace the problem back to a bad dependency line in a
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:23 +
> From: a...@xfsmail.com
> To:
> Subject: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
>
> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>
> I'm with
> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>
>
>
> bash,
> versio
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:23 +
> From: a...@xfsmail.com
> To:
> Subject: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
>
> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>
> I'm with
> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>
>
>
> bash,
> versio
> From: Simon Geard
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:23:05 +1300
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
>
> On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:28 +, akhiezer wrote:
> > You're expending resources to try to persuade people th
egard [init misspelled as rgeard (sic!)]
this issue - and its context (that you side-stepped in an earlier reply) -
as not important?
Why are you bothered to be bothered? Why not just keep calm and carry on and
accept what you're getting?
rgds,
akhiezer
> Simon.
>
> --
> From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Nov 27 23:33:32 2013
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:13:29 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
>
> Gordon Findlay wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> That's kind of what confuses me about this
> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:27:26 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
>
.
.
> The wording in this message comes across a little too strong. Yes, we
> sometimes get a little emotional about the foolishness that we
> From: Simon Geard
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:05:53 +1300
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
>
.
.
> But really, what's wrong with it? All the melodrama, talking about
> "abominations" and complaining about Lennart breaking
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:25:35 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:00:3
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:08:48 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] New dovecot page: '--with-...' specs.
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:40:42AM +, akhiezer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:13:56 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] [blfs-support] akamai / osuosl / mailing-list
> archives (pt. 94)
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53:22AM +, akhiezer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:08:48 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] New dovecot page: '--with-...' specs.
>
.
.
> Yeah, I would prefer italic for options but I'm not touching that
> stuff (the xml itself) with the proverbial barge-pole
> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:00:31 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
> >>> What happens if you do:
> >>> (1) highlight & copy the text using the same metho
Hi,
Could a similar thing (to the Akamai note below) be swung for LFS/BLFS?
And likewise, as noted before, for master-mirroring at e.g. osuosl.org?
Could be some ways to, inter alia, get the mailing-list archives available
again.
Ref: http://www.slackware.com/
"Slac
> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:55:59 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:20:38
> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:20:38 -0500
> From: Ron Hartikka
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
>
>
> Even supposing the HTML looks innocent, I'm wondering if there are other
> ways
> From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Oct 23 21:34:56 2013
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:16:23 -0400
> From: Viola Zoltán
> To: akhiezer ,
> LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
> Pass 1
>
>
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:01:40 +0100
> From: (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
> Pass 1
>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
> > From: Viola Zoltán
> > To: LFS Support
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
> From: Viola Zoltán
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
> Pass 1
>
>
>
> Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
>
> CFLAGS="-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti"; make
>
> CFLAGS="
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Pwn Me
> To: "lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org"
> Subject: [lfs-support] ABOUT LFS
>
> guys i have another question.. i'm done with my LFS 7.3 and it actually works
> now but some commands like APT, REBOOT, HALT etc. have the same outputs when
> From: "parmenides"
> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 02:40:05 +0800
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect
>
>
> >> > Do you have the parameter 'SU_WHEEL_ONLY' set in /etc/login.defs ? If
> >> > so, to
> >> > what value?
> >>
> >> Yes, but I think it does not matter, because I ca
> From: "parmenides"
> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 01:53:10 +0800
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "akhiezer"
> To: "LFS Support List"
> Sent: Saturday, August 03,
> From: "lux-integ"
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:35:15 +0100
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] usb (?hotplug?) problem
>
.
.
>
> I am beginning to wonder if devfs (especially the rewritten version in the
> mid
> noughties ) should not be dusted off and brought up to
> date (Linus ar
> Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 21:45:12 +0800
> From: Parmenides
> Subject: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect
>
> I am so sorry for previous two messages that gum up the works. :-) This is
> the whole messag:
>
> I am using LFS 6.3 without PAM installed. I have create a normal user
> 'weedl
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> From: TJ Olaes
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:51:59 + (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Can't get LFS to boot,
> fsck.ext4 no such file or directory while trying to open
>
> akhiezer cruziero.com> writes:
>
&g
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> From: TJ Olaes
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:29:15 + (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Can't get LFS to boot,
> fsck.ext4 no such file or directory while trying to open
>
> akhiezer cruziero.com> writes:
>
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:31:36 +
> From: Robin
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Can't get LFS to boot,
> fsck.ext4 no such file or directory while trying to open
>
> grub> linux /vmlinux-3.8.3-lfs-7.3 root=/dev/sda8
>
> /dev/hda8 is the ext4 root partition
>
> sda8
> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:48:22 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] GUID Partition Tables (GPT)
>
> xinglp wrote:
> > 2013/3/21 Bruce Dubbs :
.
.
> >>
> >> The example table is outdated. We really don't want the first partition
> >> t
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:33:39 +
> From: tilmanbregler
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] help, i hosed my windows partition
>
.
.
>
> so this is a bit emberassing, and I appreciate if you say this is
> nothing to do with you. I have this dual bo
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:20:49 +0200
> Subject: Error during gcc build
> From:
>
> Hello. I am newbie to LFS and I reached the step of building gcc.
> During compilation (make command) I receive the following error:
>
.
.
> configure: error: in
> `/home/proger/LFS/
20091217094941_-0600: Guy Dalziel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:12:49PM +0000, akhiezer wrote:
> > Would it be useful to also wrap the '<#paper_size#>' in a css (or
> > similar) style, so that it can readily be made to stand out more,
> > visually?
20091210103556_-0600: Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> akhiezer wrote:
> > 20091206125602_-0600: Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Chris Staub wrote:
> >>
> >>> Actually, it was recently *added* to Ncurses...just not in a stable
> >>> version yet - it&#x
20091206125602_-0600: Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Chris Staub wrote:
>
> > Actually, it was recently *added* to Ncurses...just not in a stable
> > version yet - it's in the batch of upstream patches. I believe it's my
> > fault - I sent in a ticket report with a list of program updates,
> > includin
/dev/sda...' naming system, and your newly-compiled LFS-kernel
is looking for 'dev/hda', etc; depends on your kernel config.
Ref, e.g.:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/faq/2009-December/000399.html
As is the way of these things, the problem you're getting may
76 matches
Mail list logo
