On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:40 AM, littlebat wrote:
> This issue was posted onto lfs-support mailing list yesterday (see:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2010-June/038814.html ),
> unluckly I disabled the mail delivery of LFS mailing list some days ago, so I
> can't continue di
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> what is your original distribution? RedHat ES5?
>
> I am able do some primative shell commands thru myweb console ( lucky i guess)
>
> + rpm -qf /dev
> filesystem-2.4.0-1
> + uname -a
> Linux fortidb 2.6.18-53.el5PAE #1 SMP Wed Oct
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Angel Tsankov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the order of directories in /etc/ld.so.conf matter?
Yes. Libraries will match from the first directory they're found from
/etc/ld.so.conf then /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 (on 64 bit systems).
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.o
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:32 AM, ell sam wrote:
> I am having trouble booting from the kernel on my hd to load Linux from
> my usb hd. I have installed everything and it works using the internal
> hd kernel booting from grub passing the root=/dev/sdb6 to the kernel.
>
> I want to pass something o
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Chris Burel wrote:
> Hi support,
> I'm trying to get my 2 audio cards to get the same dsp/dsp1 link
> across reboots. I tried this approach based on their PCI id:
>> cat 70-persistent-dsp.rules
> # Audigy card is dsp
> BUS="pci", ID="02:0a.0", NAME="dsp"
> # Inte
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Jack Stone wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a LFS 6.3 system which I am trying to attach a Maxtor Onetouch IV
> USB hard disk too. The system recognises the disk under the udev_retry
> script but only after the next init script finished running, i.e after
> udevsettle r
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:08 AM, support wrote:
>
>> It is pointless? I don't get what you are after? It is pointless to
>> download a file and then to compute an md5 and say that it is the md5
>> for that file. When you go to download a file, there is usually an md5
>> for that download and ther
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Ray Hogaboom wrote:
> After sending email asking for help I got.
>
> lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
>
> "Your mail to 'lfs-support' with the subject
>
> Lfs-6.4 ch 6.9 Glibc-2.8-20080929
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approv
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dustin W. wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
>
>> There is no package called API headers. It's the linux kernel source
>> (linux-[version].tar.bz2).
>
> Whoops, that was dumb. I thought of that, and tried it, but of course
> I had forgot
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:37 PM, William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> Is there any way to get some of the archives from the mailing
> lists? They are all error 403 right now.
I could be wrong, but I think Gerard disabled the archives because
they were causing
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 20:44 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
>> My concern isn't that there are debug symbols referencing /tools - my
>> concern is that they're almost certainly a sign that things are being
>> linked against the wro
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Ralph Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've went through this a couple of times, checking the dependancies
> and all.
>
> Here is the config i used.
>
> ./configure $XORG_CONFIG --with-module-dir=$XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/
> modules --with-xkb-output=
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Brittany Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:43 PM, GMail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I don't know if there is a bug or feature with this mailing list.
>>
>> I submitted three questions using a gmail address and each one
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Wolfgang Messingschlager
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Wolfgang Messingschlager
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> meanwhile I did
>>>
>>> - ma
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Wolfgang Messingschlager
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> meanwhile I did
>
> - make mrproper
> - make menuconfig(CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y)
> - make
> - make modules_install
> - cp -v arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26.1
> - cp -v .config /boot/config-2.6.26.1
>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Friday 10 October 2008 00:10:25 Lee Amy escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a newbie at LFS and I'm going to build my own LiveCD by this great
>> project. Anyway, I hope you could tell me what I need at first. I
>>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 11:00:13 Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> strace -f -eopen kdesktop
>
> That's fantastic.
>
> I'm going to have to spend some time on this page!
> http://www.linux
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Bill Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Dan,
> I'll check -Wall.
>
> Can you add a bunch of zeros and see if it still works? I was able to try
> this on another system, and the problem still existed, but it needed a bit
> more zeros.
Ah, now I got it. Look
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Bill Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I validated this by making a little program that does nothing but prints this
> using printf:
>
> #include
>
> int main() {
>printf ("%-1.3s", "hello");
> }
>
> Same thing, no output. But if I decrease the numb
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just realized that I did the 2nd pass of binutils-2.17 build from within
> the source directory instead of the build directory. Is this going to be
> a problem with the rest of the build? If it is, can I undo it and how,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Satish Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chapter 5.25 perl compilation i got one error when run command make
> perl utilities
>
> error is Can't cd to /sources/perl-5.8.8/ext/IO
>
> but i have /mnt/lfs/source then why it showing /sources directory on root
>
>
>
>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Satish Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Tell me can i install ubuntu to build lfs ? its possible to
> build it?
> or which OS i use to build lfs Redhat 9.0 ?
Any Ubuntu would be fine. Redhat 9 should be fine, I think, but it may
be too old if y
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:25 PM, David Goss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recompiled the kernel, but the problem persists. This is the exact error:
>
> Root-FFS: No NFS server available, giving up
> VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sda4" or unkn
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Christian Gardner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Just the controller is what we need. For libata, this corresponds to
>> CONFIG_ATA_PIIX. Even on 2.6.22, I think you'll want the libata SATA
>> support. I've been using ata_piix on two Intel systems with
>> linux-2.6.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Christian Gardner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Almost certainly it's because the necessary driver is not compiled
>> into the kernel. The Ubuntu .config and kernel will probably not work
>> for you because the drivers are modules and you need to have an
>> initramf
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Michael Spitler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I am working with LFS Version SVN-20080604.
> Only deviation is that I chose to use kernel 2.6.25.8 instead.
> I am using Ubuntu 8.04 as my host system.
>
> Everything seems to have worked fine until I reached Ch.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Christian Gardner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, hope someone can help me out, it's been five years since I last used
> LFS (or linux for that matter!) so I'm a bit rusty...
>
> I've gone through the LFS6.3 book. It all seems to go fine until I boot up
> the
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Rafael Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/19, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Are you bind mounting the /dev partition when you enter the chroot? If
>> you can't see /dev/hd* from within the chroot, then neit
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Rafael Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Murali,
>
> 1. Only one hard drive
>
> 2. & 3. From OUTSIDE chroot:
> root [ / ]# df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/lfs-cd 1548144 1265408204096 87% /
> /dev/
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:12:21AM +0930, Sharif Oerton wrote:
>> On Friday 06 June 2008 02:58:03 Ken Moffat wrote:
>> > When the build failed, did you not see a series of messages
>> > something like "making all in foo" "maki
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Richard Melville
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anybody know whether the above are compatible? I've inadvertently
> installed Mesa-6.5.2 instead of 6.5 and xorg-server-1.1.1 does not like
> some header files. It looks like _pp_ has been inserted into
> slang_v
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Sanjeet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> recently...when i executed /sbin/ipw3945d-start the device node got created
> and i could find a directory eth0 for the device in
> /sys/class/net(ipw3945 is the driver)but why doesn't it startup at
> boot.
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Mag. Leonhard Landrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I believe to have
>
> 1.) 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet
> Controller (rev a1)
> 2.) 01:04.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit
> Ethernet Cont
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying my first LFS-6.3. I use LiveCD as host
>
> In chapter 6.16 Coreutils... the command
>
> su-tools nobody ...
>
> give me the error
>
> bash : su-tools : command not found
Do you have /tools/bin at the end
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Gernot Jander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I try to install LFS-6.3 using jhalfs. All runs well until task
> 129-network, where jhalfs exits with the messages:
>/sys/class/net not available
>/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net-rules : No such
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I get this error running make check
>
> 1 of 566 tests failed
> (38 tests were not run)
>
> *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
> Leaving directory /sources/autoconf-1.10/tests
> *** [check-am] Error 2
> Leaving director
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Nicolas FRANCOIS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The flex version present in the SVN LFS book has some compatibility
> problem with old lex. Or, to be more precise (if I understood the message
> I wrote clearly), the previous versions of flex did not halt on
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:44 AM, J. Greenlees
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> errors with yacc, command not found
> error 127
>
> so the question:
> Bison or BYacc? which one to install and link to yacc?
You want bison. It installs a yacc binary.
> or, is it not worth installing either into
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >Ursprungligt meddelande
> >Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Datum: 2008/03/27 21:37
> >Till: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "LFS Support List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Ärende: Re: problem perl sectio
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Oswin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My host system is a Debian etch on a 64 Bit machine.
I didn't catch this the first time. The LFS book does not currently
support 64 bit machines. There is an experimental book which has
support for non-multilib x86_64:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Manuel Gonzalez Montoya
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I realized that I was using the package udev-config-20080217.tar.bz2
> instead of udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2 listed in the book, once
> installed the later /dev/null get the right permissions.
>
> I dont k
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Oswin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all :)
> Sorry, my English is a bit bad, i hope you understand me anyway :)
> I'm currently working with the development version of LFS, because the
> stable version didn't work for me. I got linker errors all the time
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:53 PM, lanas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Then, does this imply that a full system on a ARM processor such as the
> Linksys NSLU2 can only be fully built natively on that very slow
> processor ? Isn't it possible to build a full system by only using
> cross-compilati
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Michael Franzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just finished building LFS 6.3 and everything is well. It starts up
> fine if all directories are on one parition. However, I plan to use
> several partitions for some directories due to security reasons. Some
> time a
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Clyde Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> So, what I meant was: why bother cleaning dummy.c, a.out, and dummy.log
> out of gcc-build before I remove all of gcc-build anyway?
I guess there's no really good reason, but it guards against the
possibility wher
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Clyde Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the end of Chapter 6.12. I gave the following commands:
> rm -v dummy.c a.out dummy.log
> cd ..
> rm -rf gcc-4.1.2
> rm -rf gcc-build
>
> Did I just dust, vacuum, and mop before demolishing the building?
> I supp
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Ross Nesbitt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> when i run /tools/bin/gcc --version in the chroot env i get the following:
>
> bash: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or directory
>
> when i exit chroot and then run /tools/bin/gcc --version as root of the host
> i get the
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The command covers all the arches we currently support: x86 and x86_64
> > for Linux. We really don't need to be adjusting the default specs for
> > GNU ma
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the
> book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I
> found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for
> fi
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:05 AM, mark jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have completed the chapter 5. But I am facing one problem in chapter
> 6.10 every time. After done all the steps before it, then query the following:
> >
> > $> grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|;
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> > Eric Stout wrote:
> >> (that is, tools for raid, not the specific package "raidtools".. mdadm is
> >> much better in my opinion)
> >
> > When was the last time you used the CD? mdadm has been availab
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howard_apfc6 wrote:
> > - Seems like the ultimate build platform for newbs.
>
> That's exactly what I am against. LiveCD users create 90% of support
> requests.
> Noobs (not to be confused with newbs) should be
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Sharif Oerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having some trouble following the instructions in section 7.11.
>
> I'm installing on a computer that will be connected to the Internet via ADSL,
> using DHCP (not sure if that's relevant or not but it's
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:42 AM, lanas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There's an uncommon problem with trying to modify the root password at
> the end of building a LFS 6.3 system. I'm sure this does not pertain
> to LFS and something must be not quite right. I've never seen this
>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Wilco Beekhuizen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The use of make -j 3 really speeds up compilation on my new dual core
> laptop. I noticed some problems with autoconf and make -j.
> Furthermore, I checked the gentoo portage and it seems a lot of
> packages are brok
On Feb 18, 2008 4:36 AM, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, at 02:16 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > So, if you're using bash as /bin/sh, then just use ECHO=echo. Using
> > the builtin echo will be less overhead then forking /bin/echo ever
On Feb 17, 2008 1:56 PM, Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:10:13AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 2008 6:16 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > You really should get the
On Feb 17, 2008 6:16 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Henty wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:00:12PM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >
> >> This is because the new kernel defaults to UTF-8 on the console. You
> >> need a new version of the "console" bootscr
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Steven Locher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Von: Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:16:08PM +0100, Steven Locher wrote:
> > >
> > > It is not for admins, but there is a chapter (2 weeks) reserved for
> > > that. My i
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Steven Locher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another newbie question:
>
> I just finished 5.3 compiling bin-utils and moving to 5.4. GCC.
> Although there is a patch for gcc, it is not mentioned to apply
> that before compiling.
>
> Is that right? In 5.4 GCC Pass
On Feb 11, 2008 12:54 PM, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:00:45PM +0100, Steven Locher wrote:
> > I am an IT instructor with allround experience in Unixes, like Solaris,
> > FreeBSD, Slackware and Debain - but never had time for LFS. I used to teach
> > C and Ja
On Feb 6, 2008 12:47 PM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for my quoting.
>
> jhalfs is guiding me through the end of Ch. 8.
> The only step that it skip is grub loading.
> That's fine. I want to install grub on my own.
>
> I've found my mistake: after building all, jhals
On Feb 6, 2008 6:53 AM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Il giorno mer, 06/02/2008 alle 05.52 -0800, Dan Nicholson ha scritto:
> > This sounds like a jhalfs issue. I think what's happening as that the
> > chroot gets setup properly when buildin
On Feb 6, 2008 3:57 AM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think i've found the mistake.
>
> /dev directory is semy-empty!
>
> # ls -la /dev
> crw--- 1 root root 5, 1 5 feb 16:35 console
> crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 3 5 feb 16:35 null
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21 6 feb 10:21 tty
On Feb 5, 2008 10:57 AM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 10:19 AM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Il giorno mar, 05/02/2008 alle 10.10 -0800, Dan Nicholson ha scritto:
> > > So, is the problem that it&#x
On Feb 5, 2008 10:40 AM, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, at 10:10 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 2008 9:55 AM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Il giorno mar, 05/02/2008 alle 06.02 -0800, D
On Feb 5, 2008 10:19 AM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Il giorno mar, 05/02/2008 alle 10.10 -0800, Dan Nicholson ha scritto:
> > So, is the problem that it's not asking you to enter the password
> > again if it's a weak password?
>
> It
On Feb 5, 2008 9:55 AM, Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Il giorno mar, 05/02/2008 alle 06.02 -0800, Dan Nicholson ha scritto:
> > It sounds like something bad has happened. Can you run the command
> > again as "LC_ALL=C passwd root"? I can&#
2008/2/5 Alessandro Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all, I'm new to LFS and I've got a problem.
> After building correctly with JHALFS, I've tryied to change root
> password inside chroot but passwd doesn't work.
>
> If i run:
>
> "passwd root", command exit imediatly with: "
> Cambio della pass
On Feb 3, 2008 7:46 AM, Justin O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 10:02 AM, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you mean you're running those commands from a different system, not
> > from the one that's having the problem, then those results mean nothing.
> > Unless I'm
On Jan 30, 2008 11:56 PM, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, at 04:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Chapter 4.3 - 4.4: Is there any particular crucial reason why the bash
> > startup scripts for lfs user have to be created and subsequently sourced
> > ("source ~/.bash
On Jan 30, 2008 12:35 PM, amarsoft amarsoft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in chroot. I don't have those /dev/random or /dev/urandom.
>
>
> - Original Message ----
> From: Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: BLFS Support List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 30, 2008 12:21 PM, amarsoft amarsoft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PRNG initialisation failed -- exiting.
> ssh-rand-helper child produced insufficient data
> PRNG initialisation failed -- exiting.
> ssh-rand-helper child produced insufficient data
> PRNG initialisation failed -- exiting.
>
On Jan 26, 2008 11:00 AM, Mark Olbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2) I put some echo statements in /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc to watch what was
> happening. After running the last script in /etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d it exists
> normally. But I also had it display the running processes before it exited
>
On Jan 26, 2008 10:06 AM, Mark Olbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an oddball problem that is causing me to rip out hair :)
>
> My LFS 6 system, which has performed like a champ for years, suddenly stopped
> booting the other day. Initially the problem was that it couldn't "see"
> /dev/sda
On Jan 21, 2008 4:06 PM, Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on a scripting build system to build LFS 6.3 from a subversion
> repository.
>
> I have successfully built all the chapters up to the end of 5.
>
> I am starting on Chapter 6.
>
> From Chapter 6.6. Creating Essential Files
On Jan 15, 2008 10:38 AM, Dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> LFS book : SVN-2008-0104
> uname -a : Linux saturn 2.6.23.8-34.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 22 20:32:37 EST
> 2007 i586 i586 i386 GNU/Linux
> CPU: Intel Pentium MMX 200
>
> On step 5.6 have next error while compil
On Jan 15, 2008 5:33 PM, Lee McCafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:22 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > It appears you're still using your host's gcc instead of the one at
> > /tools/bin/gcc. Perhaps you missed the /tools/
On Jan 15, 2008 5:15 PM, Lee McCafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm trying to install lfs onto an Ext3 partition on a dual core
> intel x86, with ubuntu 7.10 as my base system. In chapter 5.5 Linux API
> Headers I get this error after running make headers_check
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt
On Jan 1, 2008 7:36 AM, Tobias Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm trying to compile perl, i also tried to use the perl-5.10.0 instead
> of the 5.8.8-package, but both of them fail with this message:
>
>
> Making B (dynamic)
> make[1]: Entering directory `/sources/perl-5.10.0/ext/B
On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all thank you for help on the kernel configuration (I went to the
> newest version). I now have two questions if you update gcc, glibc, or
> binutils: Do you have to start back with 5.1 or can you build these with
> older v
On Dec 6, 2007 6:47 AM, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Feichtinger wrote these words on 12/06/07 04:42 CST:
> >
> > Right.
> > But! If the question is asked again and again? Isn't that a hint for
> > improvement?
>
> As I answered before, "I suppose". It just seems weird to re
On Dec 5, 2007 4:35 PM, Clyde Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> This seems to come up on the list regularly. I, too ran afoul of this
> obvious tip. In re-reading the text I notice that I must struggle to not
> see it as:
>
> "IMPORTANT! Before issuing the build instructions for a package,
On Dec 2, 2007 3:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Compilation of blender stops with:
>
>
> cd
> /usr/src/blender/blender-2.45/obj/linux-glibc2.3.6-i386/gameengine/blphys/blbullet/;
> ar ruv
> /usr/src/blender/blender-2.45/obj/linux-glibc2.3.6-i386/gameengine/blphys/blbullet/libblbullet.a
>
On Nov 26, 2007 10:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One of the things i find difficult to script is a "nice" (read pretty)
> way of continuing the install script after doing "su - lfs". the 'su'
> command apparently starts a subshell process, and so the new subshell
> just wa
On Nov 9, 2007 4:56 AM, John Whitmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In my /tools directory I've got two candidates:
>
> /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1.2
The first one is wrong, and it should be in /tools/bin.
> However my $(gcc -dumpmachine) gives me
>
> i486-pc-
On Nov 8, 2007 11:26 PM, sizo nsibande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I just started chapter 6 of linux from scratch using version 6.2 of
> the book and the accompanying LFS distro, I ran:
> ../glibc-2.3.6/configure --prefix=/usr --disable-profile
> --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.6.0 --libexec
On 11/7/07, Clyde Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm attempting LFS 6.3 using the LFS Live 6.3 CD.
> At the end of 5.4 GCC-4.1.2 - Pass 1
> I am to create a symlink.
> "ln -vs gcc /tools/bin/cc"
>
> The context puzzles me.
> I have been burned before by not reading the "! Important" parts i
On 11/2/07, Bijan Hoomand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Dan
>
> Thanks for your help, the name is exactly what you mentioned, libc-dev. I
> could install it and I'm feeling much better now!
> I have one more question, even though it's not about installing anything,
> it's about the whole concep
On 11/1/07, Bijan Hoomand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> cat config.log
> This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
> running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
>
> configure:611: checking host system type
> configure:632: checking target
On 11/1/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yet another weirdness on my desktops (xorg-7.3, gnome-2.20.latest
> and specifically xorg-server-1.4.0 and gdm-2.20.1). Once I've got gdm
> built, I switch my default runlevel to 5. Normally, it "just works",
> but on current builds I'm seeing
On 11/1/07, Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Extend your kernel command line with "loglevel=1" and/or "quiet". This will
> stop many kernel messages to become visible on the console.
Something I added for LFS-6.3 was a sysconfig parameter to control the
kernel log level on the consol
On 10/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Real sorry about this. I should have fixed it months ago. The problem
> >is that the samba script calls our killproc() function, which
> >basically just finds any process named what we asked it and start
> >killing it. The problem is that
On 10/12/07, bill aspell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/lfs/sources/patch-2.5.4$ 5.24.1. Installation of Patch
> bash: 5.24.1.: command not found
Looks like you copied the wrong part of the text. There's no command
"5.24.1. Installation of Patch". I think you want "make inst
On 10/11/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >* Convert from DocBook to Texinfo with the docbook2x tools
> >* Dump to text with a (really) simple stylesheet
> >* Dump to man format with a stylesheet included in
Coming in late here...
On 10/6/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking over the logs for my new LFS system I noticed something odd. Right at
> the very top after klogd is started are these two lines:
>
> Oct 6 16:56:13 lbc1211 kernel: Cannot find map file.
> Oct 6 16:56:
On 10/5/07, EJBoshinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your comment aboves raises a question. As a sanity check, from 5.1-
> Important Note (2) : "
> After installing each package, delete its source and build
> directories, unless specifically instructed otherwise. Deleting th
On 10/5/07, EJBoshinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. I will rebuild from the beginning once again,
> starting with newly formatted, mounted, assigned etc. partitions and user &
> groups on a physically separate and dedicated drive. When I come to
> gcc-pass2, I
On 10/5/07, Elias Zoby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> root:/sources/linux-2.6.22.5# sed -i '/scsi/d' include/Kbuild
> root:/sources/linux-2.6.22.5# make mrproper
> /sources/linux-2.6.22.5/scripts/gcc-version.sh: line 11: /tools/bin/gcc: No
> such file or directory
> But I have gcc on $LFS/tools/b
On 10/5/07, EJBoshinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>If that doesn't have /tools, then the gcc-pass2 build was definitely borked.
> >
> >That is exactly what is happening. gcc -dumpspecs responds with:
> >
> />lib/ld-linux.so.2
> >
> >However, at the end of gcc-pass2,
> >
> >$echo 'main(){}
1 - 100 of 817 matches
Mail list logo
