On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:12:21AM +0930, Sharif Oerton wrote: >> On Friday 06 June 2008 02:58:03 Ken Moffat wrote: >> > When the build failed, did you not see a series of messages >> > something like "making all in foo" "making all in foo/bar", followed >> > by an error message, then a series of other messages as it leaves >> > directories, before the final "Error n" ? >> >> No, just the "Missing separator" error message. >> >> > Since you don't seem to believe there are multiple Makefiles, try >> > (in the gcc-build directory) >> > find . -name 'Makefile' >> >> That only returns one line, /.Makefile. >> >> Sharif >> > In that case, I have no idea what the specific cause is. I guess > you are missing something essential - it almost sounds as if make > itself is not found, but you couldn't have got this far.
There is absolutely no good reason why @SET_MAKE@ is not getting substituted. _Something_ will get substituted by configure; I can see the macro where it's done. The only way I can think of is that the subconfigure in the gcc directory actually failed and there is an earlier error. Can you please post the log of the failure? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
