On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 20:44 +1300, Simon Geard wrote: >> My concern isn't that there are debug symbols referencing /tools - my >> concern is that they're almost certainly a sign that things are being >> linked against the wrong binaries, causing things like bison to fail. >> >> As I said, I'm assuming this problem is caused by something I've done >> wrong, causing Chapter 6 to favor /tools libraries and executables when >> it shouldn't. I just can't see quite why. > > Ok, I've been looking at the logs from a fresh build, got a few > questions. > > 1. Should Chapter 6 binutils be using /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld as > it's linker? > > 2. Should Chapter 6 GMP (i.e the package after binutils) be > using /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld? > > 3. Should Chapter 6 GCC be using the same linker? > > It looks like all packages after GCC are using /usr/bin/ld, but I guess > by then the damage is done? Seems to me that everything after the final > binutils build ought to be using it...
I think /usr/bin/ld should be used as soon as it's available, but I don't think it is. In DIY, Greg has been using -B/usr/bin/ for a long time in from readjusting through gcc build. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
