I have been using LFS for more than a year's time and it is great.
One of my friend started LFS several days ago and got an error when
adjusting the toolchain( 5.7 ). The problem was that the gcc specs path
was pointed to the host's one. It took me me a while to figure out that
he ignored the crea
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:37:54PM -, William Zhou wrote:
>
> But I believe the creation of LFS should be stated to be mandatory, or at
> least make this clear.
And lose the excellent lesson your friend learned from this? :) We
cannot be liable for people ignoring large chunks of the book.
>
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the first
pre-release of LFS 6.1.1. This release includes fixes for all known
errata since LFS-6.1 was released 4 months ago.
You can read the book online at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1.1-pre1/ or download to read
locall
>
> And lose the excellent lesson your friend learned from this? :) We
> cannot be liable for people ignoring large chunks of the book.
I agreed with you.
In 6.5, Creating directories. You don't have to have the /usr/local/game.
If it is only a recommendation, it should not affect the LFS itself.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:46:45PM +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> A special note of thanks to Archaic for his assistance with all the
> behind the scenes activities that went into this release. His release
> scripts and notes as have been a massive time saver! Archaic, you're a
> star!
aw
William Zhou wrote:
One of my friend started LFS several days ago and got an error when
adjusting the toolchain( 5.7 ). The problem was that the gcc specs path
was pointed to the host's one. It took me me a while to figure out that
he ignored the creation of user lfs and thus the ~/.bashrc is no
Hello
In chapter 6.22.1, during the install of Readline, the
book say:
Now move the static libraries to a more appropriate
location:
mv -v /lib/lib{readline,history}.a /usr/lib
But it seems that these libraries are still installed
correctly in /usr/lib by the "make install" command.
Or am I fals
On 11/17/05, go moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In chapter 6.22.1, during the install of Readline, the
> book say:
> Now move the static libraries to a more appropriate
> location:
> mv -v /lib/lib{readline,history}.a /usr/lib
>
> But it seems that these libraries are still installed
> correctly
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:08:07PM -, William Zhou wrote:
>
> (BTW, How do I reply to a specif thread instead of creating a new one?
> I tried to figure it out but I can't. Thanks.)
You can't. You are using a crappy mail client. Download thunderbird.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and
--- Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/17/05, go moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In chapter 6.22.1, during the install of Readline,
> the
> > book say:
> > Now move the static libraries to a more
> appropriate
> > location:
> > mv -v /lib/lib{readline,history}.a /usr/lib
> >
> >
Archaic wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:08:07PM -, William Zhou wrote:
(BTW, How do I reply to a specif thread instead of creating a new one?
I tried to figure it out but I can't. Thanks.)
You can't. You are using a crappy mail client. Download thunderbird.
I use Thunderbird (1
On 11/17/05, go moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The configure command in the book is
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/lib
> > so the libraries will go to /lib unless you used a
> > different command.
>
> I used this command, and I get a mess
William Zhou wrote:
I have been using LFS for more than a year's time and it is great.
One of my friend started LFS several days ago and got an error when
adjusting the toolchain( 5.7 ). The problem was that the gcc specs path
was pointed to the host's one. It took me me a while to figure out th
Hello,
There has been a high amount of traffic related to the chroot
environment of chapter 6.
It would be great if we could tie people down, force their eyelids
open, and make them read! However, that would probably be torture. We
probably do not condone torture.
"Remember that if for a
William Harrington wrote:
It would be great if we could tie people down, force their eyelids
open, and make them read! However, that would probably be torture. We
probably do not condone torture.
Heh. Sure we do!
"Running
/sources/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp .
On 11/17/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Harrington wrote:
> > Is it a good idea to include something about populating dev in that
> > part, too?
>
> Yes, I think I agree with your assessment. The information is there, but
> it is missed way too much. I don't think this is
«ХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ ДОГОВОРЫ: ПРАВОВЫЕ И НАЛОГОВЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ДЛЯ ЦЕЛЕЙ ОПТИМИЗАЦИИ
НАЛОГООБЛОЖЕНИЯ»
Консультационный семинар - 21 ноября 2005.
Семинар ориентирован на: финансовых директоров и руководителей компаний,
главных бухгалтеров, специалистов по налоговому планированию
Время проведения: 10-
Jeremy Byron wrote:
William Zhou wrote:
--snip--
Regards,
Jeremy.
I think that you have mis-understood William's email. From his email, I
gather that he means that the commands set in 1 through 3 should be
stated as 'Compulsory', ie if not used then you have a good chance of
making yo
William Harrington wrote:
Hello,
There has been a high amount of traffic related to the chroot
environment of chapter 6.
It would be great if we could tie people down, force their eyelids
open, and make them read! However, that would probably be torture. We
probably do not condone tor
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
William Harrington wrote:
You are discussing this WONTFIX bug:
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1649
Yes, but a couple of things here:
1) This item needed more discussion by the community. Also the
suggestion made in the bug is a little differe
Emu wrote:
I think that you have mis-understood William's email. From his email, I
gather that he means that the commands set in 1 through 3 should be
stated as 'Compulsory', ie if not used then you have a good chance of
> I think as Linux becomes more mainstream, more people are going to
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:30:44 -0600
William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There has been a high amount of traffic related to the chroot
> environment of chapter 6.
> It would be great if we could tie people down, force their eyelids
> open, and make them read! Howeve
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Greetings All:
Due to various recurring issues with our news server, it has been
decided to take it offline indefinitely. We apologize for any
inconvenience this causes.
In the meantime, the LFS server admins are researching making use of
gman
--- Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/17/05, go moko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The configure command in the book is
> > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/lib
> > > so the libraries will go to /lib unless you used
> a
> > >
--- Jeremy Byron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emu wrote:
> >
> > I think that you have mis-understood William's
> email. From his email, I
> > gather that he means that the commands set in 1
> through 3 should be
> > stated as 'Compulsory', ie if not used then you
> have a good chance of
> >
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
