I use LFS in real life applications, I hope this gets included...
ET
Matthew Burgess writes:
> Hi,
>
> As mentioned at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-07/msg00411.html,
> GCC-4.4.1 will be announced shortly.
>
> There's a report that GCC-4.4.0 fails to compile at least 'dillo'
> from BLFS
. It is still a work in progress but it works pretty
cool... :)
I would appreciate feedback if someone looks into:
http://kitepilot.com/LFS/
Thanks
Enrique A. Troconis
Randy McMurchy writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Though this topic may be borderline off-topic for the -dev lists, they
Gerard, you will never know how many lives you have touched how...
I went all the way to the bottom of the pit after September 11/2001, when I
got laid off from my M$ C++ developer role.
Back then, I had had some brief incursions with UNIX, and I was running my
little WEB server off of a server
BTW, my initramfs implementation SUCKS, but is complete, works for just
about everything, and can easily be reversed engineered as a learning
exercise.
I know how to do it better now, but it is good enough as it is and serves my
immediate purposes.
Maybe someday I'll clean it out and make it sma
Hello there:
Maybe this is irrelevant and I hope I don't offend anyone...
I've been working on a LFS package manager that works out of the tools
available in the "tools" directory (plus rsync and file) and that I could
use to manage my LFS servers.
I used the union-fs tools and I believe I
taipan67 wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Note, however, that this is not the same type of module as "insmod" and
>>> "lsmod" Grub2 commands refer to. Grub2 has its own modules for loading
>>> Linux kernels, loading FreeBSD kernels, support for filesystems,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> lists writes:
>
>> I was reading the distro specific support on linuxquestions.org for lfs,
>> someone posted the following:
>> "
>> earlier i could not create binutils-build directory using d command
>> given in book as lfs
I was reading the distro specific support on linuxquestions.org for lfs,
someone posted the following:
"
earlier i could not create binutils-build directory using d command
given in book as lfs user. i did it by changing to root n made
$LFS/binutils-build the working directory for binutils n procee
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:17:51AM -0700, lists wrote:
>> If the editors pick a pm, then they are removing the "choice" part of that.
>
> And for that reason I think I would be against adding a specific PM to
> LFS/BLFS. However, dropping
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/15/07 11:42 CST:
>
~snip~
>
> I can't see it happening in BLFS for the simple reason that it would
> be a monumental task (automating the proper inserts could perhaps be
> done, but we wouldn't do that until *every* package has been
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:37:12AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> I'll go on record as -1.
>
> I'm not going to push to get this into LFS. If the vast majority of
> those with a voice here are for PM in LFS, great. If not, great. :)
>
>> I feel we should mention it, prov
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The LFS LiveCD team is pleased to announce a new 64bit-only CD. It is a
> minimal CD, meaning that it contains no X Windows System and dependent
> software nor any source packages. The LFS book that is included is based
> on the current development x86_64 bra
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> Anything else?
>
> LiveCD. I simply have no possibility to fix all known bugs, so LFS 6.3 has
> to be released without the CD and should not mention it at all.
>
My own issue with the livecd on the inspiron is actually the hardware,
not your
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
~snip~
>
> Hmm. I figured they'd show up on a different bus, since it is really a
> different physical bus. Well, whatever. I'd still like to know where
> the device symlink points though. :-)
>
>
I seem to remember when I had a laptop that I used a pcmcia network card
14 matches
Mail list logo
