BTW, my initramfs implementation SUCKS, but is complete, works for just 
about everything, and can easily be reversed engineered as a learning 
exercise.
I know how to do it better now, but it is good enough as it is and serves my 
immediate purposes.
Maybe someday I'll clean it out and make it smaller and more efficient...   
:)
Enrique 

 

 


intercha...@kitepilot.com writes: 

> I believe I have a fairly "neutral" Package Management implementation.
> I hope somebody swings by
> http://kitepilot.com/LFS/
> and gives me an opinion...
> Thanks.
> Enrique  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> DJ Lucas writes:  
> 
>> DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> Gordon Schumacher wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Indeed, I'm not even attempting to address that yet - for the 
>>>> immediate moment, just getting each package's files isolated into its 
>>>> own tarball is such a big first step that I'm willing to deal with any 
>>>> changes that need to be made to install those packages.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's a little bit of work, but not all that bad.  In my 'vision' 
>>> of the perfect balance between packaging and being PM neutral, I've 
>>> chosen to create a /packages directory and use it as the working 
>>> directory for packaging and installation.  I've divided each package 
>>> into 3 parts: build, install, post-install, and used scripts for each.  
>>> It's a first attempt so be nice!  It *can* be streamlined...
>>>   
>> ...like test suites run after install.  Still some cruft in there from 
>> that in the cleanup section of build.sh for each package.  
>> 
>> Anyway, group of scripts is put up at 
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/DESTDIR-LFS-6.4/
>> and a tarball (if you really want it) at 
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/packages-6.4.tar.bz2  
>> 
>> I must say that new system is a lot faster than my normal build PC.  I 
>> think I'll try to make it catch up to my dev system...give me another 
>> box ready for alternate directories anyway.  OK, back to Gnome for me.  
>> 
>> -- DJ Lucas  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.  
>> 
>> -- 
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
>> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
>> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> -- 
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to