here will
be an architecture directory there.
It would be proper to have:
mkdir -pv $(grep archlibexp lib/Config.pm | cut -d"'" -f2)
cp -Rv lib/* $(grep archlibexp lib/Config.pm | cut -d"'" -f2)
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma
rkd, yet.
SIncerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
#x27;s dhcp client can't provide (such as a hostname)
wireless is to be used with encryption
and probably some others.
When having both systemd and sysvinit in the LFS Book, the network
section would be best written so that if a user is using systemd, do
this if using sysvinit, d
sure your kernel options are proper.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
;t help. Giving up for now, but it was fun while
> it lasted.
Shouldn't cause kernel panics, but you should get a few messages about
segfaults which are normal for some of the glibc tests.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:
n LFS build for ppc in a while.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 14, 2014, at 10:29 PM, Armin K. wrote:
>>> Some firmware is shipped in the kernel tree.
Yeah make firmware_install
What's next?
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe:
yan Thunder LE board and it has
dual e100 devices.
Both devices require d101m_ucode.bin.
Still works after a decade. Sure it'll work fine without the firmware,
but it works better with it.
A lot of devices will seem to work fine without the firmware, but they
will work better with
ing looking up
the all history of a branch to determine the correct number.
I read that Bazaar does that.
I do agree with you about this benefit.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the ab
As LFS xml is rather simple compared to CLFS, it most likely won't be
an issue very often.
It can already be shown how simple or complex the project can become.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
file and commit and put exactly what was changed, or change a
bunch of files and one commit and make a huge message about what was
changed or a summary, etc?. A standard way of commits is very helpful.
I don't think CLFS set this up, and I think LFS would benefit greatly
from it. I mos
On Mar 7, 2014, at 7:00 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I had a conversation with the util-linux devs and they said there
>> were
>> some advantages to building after udev but the capabilities were
>> si
and have /etc/
udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules if I'm not mistaken.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
til-linux to Ch 5.
>
> So what we have is
>
> util-linux in Ch 5
> eudev in Ch 6
> util-linux in Ch 6
>
> That reminds me. I still need to update C. Dependencies for eudev.
>
> -- Bruce
Thank you for your reason for what LFS does regarding the build
may also
wonder why, but both LFS and CLFS builds use the temp system bison and
flex for ar. That should be looked into. You can build bison and flex
before binutils and it'll be proper for final system. Be careful of a
build order as it is important.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
ailures. As long as you have
Util linux before udev, and after iana-etc, should be fine in most
cases.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ook from then as well, I'm glad akhiezer bought
it tour attention..
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 7, 2014, at 12:22 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> "Now that we have said that, lets move on to booting "
>
> s/lets/let's/ ? (let's == "let us").
Probably remove let's or let us altogether... then it is this:
"Now that we have said that, mov
inux.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 7, 2014, at 11:51 AM, xinglp wrote:
> When use initrd, with /dev/disk/by-xxx present, I can use
> root=UUID=xxx instead of root=/dev/sdxx
Your initrd should do that. You need to troubleshoot your initrd.
Sincerely,
William Harrinton
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-d
--
commit 4c803c7b33fb3b60f4e5c6cf162b4a97b7fcd045
Author: William Harrington
Date: Sun Mar 2 21:58:00 2014 -0600
Add master changelog entry for DHCPCD 6.3.1 update.
diff --git a/BOOK/introduction/common/changelog.xml b/BOOK/
introduction/common/changelog.xml
index 2e1fafd..
On Mar 5, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> FAIL: udev-test.pl
> PASS: rules-test.sh
> ...
> See test/test-suite.log
Same as we have had in CLFS since migrating to eudev.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-d
On Mar 5, 2014, at 3:09 PM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> However, I'd
> like to tell you that with git, it became painful to translate
Why was it painfuli to translate?
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-de
and the target releases are more complex.
We also have different packages.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
you've done most of the work. It's all about deploying it now if the
community decides to go with git.
There has to be a freeze to take the time to migrate svn to git, it
does take time because svn repo has been around for 10 years or so.
It'll take 12 hours or so
k that's needed.
In CLFS we use Eudev up to v 1.4 and that doesn't require gperf and
gtk-doc.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~blueness/eudev/
Grab the tarballs from there.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch
headers right at the beginning,
then it wouldn't be a problem as /tools/include wouldn't exist at that
time.
Final system kernel headers install wouldn't be a problem as /usr/
include isn't populated.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linu
eed, for example for a debian install, libgmp dev.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
xpirations lately. Please pardon my brain dead comments before.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
result. We do not built libxml2 and
libxslt in our default CLFS builds.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
/usr/share/man/man8/rmmod.8 3055root:root 644
SIncerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ash. Also, a
network connection may not be set up on chroot for downloading via a default
gateway and a name server set up.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
simple, and the user can update the
current iana-etc data.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ab the xml files,
create protocols.gawk and services.script which will be called from
the make get target to use file= or
files like Arch does. xz the patch and takes it to around 270KB and
expands to about 3.7M. Leave the whole download section and note out
of the page.
Sincerely,
W
/cross-lfs.org/view/svn/x86/final-system/iana-etc.html
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> etstat is other of the utils from net-tools I find handy and
> can't find a replacement for. If anyone else knows of a tool that
> works
> similar, please speak!
I stopped using netstat long ago and use ss from iproute2.
Si
hat fine, matter of fact you can rm a lot of libraries for
a running process until it accesses that library again, then it will
die on you.
I see you are doing this for creating a package, in which case, some
very good examples are given on how to do that relying on tools.
Sincerely,
b being your host system that you updated glibc, or the system
that you are using via chroot. It helps to be clear in all that you do.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Dec 16, 2013, at 5:17 PM, John Burrell wrote:
> When I try and update the dynamic linker, /usr/lib/ld-2.18.so in my
> case,
When why where and why?
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsub
hus /usr/lib
--with-rootlibdir you get:
rootlibdir = /lib
It's a problem when people use /usr as a separate mount. Which is a
very big problem.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscri
systemd, irregardless if you like it or not.
Systemd is a branch! That's the whole idea of having a branch.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
e long winded, yourself.
Work with people on this list or leave this project.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
toolchain at the beginning.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t the header files from Linux (output below). I'm
going to go back to LFS which I had better luck with and try to pick
up
the parts from CFLS that I need to cross build.
CLFS has mailing lists you should as for support there.
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/wiki/lists#MailingLists
Sincerely
On Sep 11, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, but it has not been very active. The last post I see was in
July.
On the other hand, posting here would be a reasonable place too.
-- Bruce
Thanks, I will subscribe and get to discussing!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
Greetings,
Is the alfs-discuss active for discussion of jhalfs or is it
elsewhere? I have some additions to jhalfs I'd like to discuss.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
ss-lfs.org/~kb0iic/livecdupd/
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
e still lots of distros out there
using gawk < 4.0. Once again, I cannot replicate the problem with
multiple distros that use gawk 3.1.8 or earlier and in a vm.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sep 7, 2013, at 4:19 PM, William Harrington wrote:
Okay, I got past the glibc install and libstdc++ install and am on
binutils pass2. The target was for x86_64.
I updated gawk to 3.1.8 which was the problem above, no issue.
KERNEL <3.10.5> OK (Min v
On Sep 7, 2013, at 3:58 PM, William Harrington wrote:
I'm testing with the updated lfs livecd for the 7.4 release.
I know I need to update sudo for the jhalfs building, and this uses
gawk from LFS 6.3 which is 3.1.5. If I encounter I'll post here.
Will may need to update it on
r the jhalfs building, and this uses
gawk from LFS 6.3 which is 3.1.5. If I encounter I'll post here. Will
may need to update it on my end, as well.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscrib
been multiple posts at the lfs-support and lfs-dev mailing
lists about it.
Don't take optimizations lightly and know exactly what they do and
make sure that you are using them for the right reason. Not sure about
installing it on a USB drive is the proper reason for using O
h -Os and -O3. It will not crop up with -O2 or -O1 or -
O0.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
will arise when using -O3 or -Os.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sep 1, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Klemen Košir wrote:
CFLAGS="-march=corei7 -Os -pipe"
Remove Os, restart the build from scratch and see if the error removes
itself.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
This will happen using certain optimizations. Which optimizations are
you using? Using default optimizations will not result in this issue.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
keep upgrading, and yes, indeed the permissions are
as described by Ken.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
the lfs livecd or using older hosts:
A prime example is here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/33291
The build will start failing when the tools start to link and run with
the glibc in /tools.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
e the form X.Y.Z and describes the smallest version of the Linux
kernel the generated library is expected to support. The higher the version
number is, the less compatibility code is added, and the faster the code gets.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
lib only and disable multilib in both binutils and gcc.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Armin,
What steps do you take when creating the make 3.82 upstream fixes patch?
I've been browsing the gnu make site at savannah and tracking bugs,
and looking through their git log and am attempting to get latest fixes.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
i-6000-4.ucode'
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR='/lib/firmware'
Another possibility that wasn't working are the permissions of the
firmware directory and or firmware file.
May want to check it is readable by the user which is building
configuring and building the kernel.
Sinc
re blob would be along the lines of "firmware_binary>" i.e. "radeon/R300_cp.bin" or "keyspan/mpr.fw"
So in the end the kernel puts "firmware/radeon/R300_cp.bin" "firmware/
keyspan/mpr.fw" into the kernel.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http:
On Jul 6, 2013, at 16:26, David Jensen wrote:
> Wouldn't be prudent in chapter 5 to set it to the running kernel, so
> there is less probability of a glitch in chroot. Chapter 6 may be OK.
What kind of glitch would be probable?
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfrom
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Looks pretty empty.
It probably still has some services not running like subversion! At
least I can't connect to the subversion server.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Still planned to start around 9:00 PM PDT (approx two hours after
sending this email).
Woohoo! Server upgrades!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq
On May 31, 2013, at 8:20 PM, William Harrington wrote:
It isn't as easy
It isn't as easy than when building
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
S, but there are knowledgeable
folks who build for ARM a lot and are at the CLFS and LFS mailing lists.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
out. I know you want to deal with qemu with your build,
but I'd share this with the community.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On May 15, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Fernando wrote:
> # cat /etc/lfs-release
> SVN-20130512
> 64bit, built with jhalfs
>
> I am worried about this:
>
> Either as normal user or as root:
> env LANG=C xzless
> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-2013.05.15-17h21m20s.log.xz
>
> error message:
> /usr/
‘register_mutex’
/sources/blfs/mariadb-5.5.30/plugin/sql_errlog/sql_logger.cc:192:46:
error: ‘mutex_list’ was not declared in this scope
Otherwise I'd use it. It's been that way with each release. I'm tired
of debugging it.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscra
rkill, but it is a good project!
There are lots of good things that are shared among the LFS community
that others can use.
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On May 14, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I fixed that a couple of days ago.
-- Bruce
Is the script at http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lfs-latest-files
reflecting your changes or do you copy the script after changes?
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
.18.0!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
now, hehe.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
S shadow page after installing linux-pam, those
get commented.
It's under the heading: Configuring Linux-PAM to Work with Shadow
Read carefully which options you want for shadow and what you should
be enabling or disabling.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
is improper after installing
Linux-PAM.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/shadow.html
The above page will give you a properly configured shadow using Linux-
PAM when followed precisely.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
think the book list wants a load of email from everyone using the
script and being successful. I'm using php 5.4.12 with the http
extension enabled.
Very nice script.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscrat
t. !
Check for typos in your /etc/inputrc file.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ed was too great
at the time.
We will let you know when they are available again. The server has
moved and things are still being sorted.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm glad you figured this out. I was wondering about it because I'd
expect a compile error if two #defines for the same token were made
without an #undef in between.
-- Bruce
While we are on topic with Bison, it has come to my attention that
On Apr 12, 2013, at 6:40 PM, William Harrington wrote:
echo '#define YYENABLE_NLS 1' >> lib/config.h
After executing ./configure --prefix=/usr and viewing lib/config.h
#define ENABLE_NLS 1 is already there. I noticed this when upgrading
bison for CLFS back at version 2.6.2.
/config.h
After executing ./configure --prefix=/usr and viewing lib/config.h
#define ENABLE_NLS 1 is already there. I noticed this when upgrading
bison for CLFS back at version 2.6.2.
There is no need to echo a definition if it is already set during the
configure process.
Sincerely,
William Har
noted with this message, and referenced, I'm sure.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
that O3 aggressive inlining is the culprit.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
r/lib/libprocps.so: symbolic
link to `../../lib/libprocps.so.1.1.1'
ldconfig -v outputs: libprocps.so.1 -> libprocps.so.1.1.1
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 30, 2013, at 8:02 AM, William Harrington wrote:
Also, don't forget to make sure that your XORG_PREFIX is /opt and
XORG_CONFIG is set right and that PKG_CONFIG_PATH is set to /opt/lib/
pkgconfig and /opt/share/pkgconfig
oh and PATH includes /opt/bin and that man is looking into
/opt/lib/
pkgconfig and /opt/share/pkgconfig
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
No, it's not set, but you wouldn't want to run a virtual system from a
livecd anyway. The client OS shouldn't need it.
Oh I see now, the option someone was mentioning was virtio.
Perhaps that is the issue.
Sincerely,
Wil
On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION=y
I think this is what the user was telling me about and I didn't have
it in the livecd's kernel config. I can fix it if this is the case.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma
maybe? I'd need
to go back to my logs.
Are there drivers specific to qemu for that?
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
near as elegant or flexible.
Hmm? If you are talking about the LFS livecd, it's from November
2007. Not sure which Arch cd you are talking about, but I'm sure it is
later than 2007.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:/
On Mar 20, 2013, at 4:01 PM, William Harrington wrote:
building current and upcoming livecd's.
Er, LFS releases.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
uld happen often, but I'm sure
plenty of people use livecd's as servers.
Changes are needed and I'm sure a newer and better livecd will be
issued to the world for building current and upcoming livecd's. I will
keep the updated livecd current as I use it and everyone is wel
requirements.
Could update more, like to go kmod and e2fsprogs 1.42 or so but those
require newer glibc.
As of now, it is good as is. However, a completely new build may be
required once the host
system requirements are updated in the LFS book.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
t I get it between 1.2 and
2.5MB/s
Doesn't hurt to put it elsewhere.
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mar 16, 2013, at 9:32 PM, William Harrington wrote:
the 7.2 LFS ppc
er 6.2 LFS ppc
Sincerely,
WIlliam Harrington--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ersion of
Xorg and all the libs and that jazz, but it all works fine for me with
newer hardware, it's just not taking advantage of the best stuff. But
really, when it comes to a livecd that made to work with building a
current LFS system, that's all it is meant for. Granted I can
linked fine. --strip-unneeded was smart enough
not to destroy the library
unlike --strip-all option.
There is already a thread about this which I recall from August:
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org/2012-08/msg00408.html
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http://
@linuxfromscratch.org/2012-08/msg00408.html
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
