On Dec 13, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > But I would be making the same recommendation if I decided to love or > hate it. Armin has done a lot of work, and it is being used by a lot > of members. I admit there has been changes I wish would have gone a > different direction (sorry Armin, I do try to speak up), but I would > like to see this succeed. sysvinit is staying, and I would like > systemd to stay as well.
There's a reason why there is a separate branch for systemd LFS. People can choose to use it or not. It doesn't matter if people like systemd or not. They can go on a rampage with their advantages and disadvantages. People contribute to a project and put effort into it and people that do want use it, will contribute. It's healthy in this atmosphere. We already have a systemd branch in clfs, but it is very old and I'm working to get it updated thanks to Armin and Martin Ward. I've used Arch and I'm impressed what can be done with systemd. For a minimalist approach, maybe not systemd. It's not like LFS is forcing systemd down user's throats. In the future, you will see more systemd, irregardless if you like it or not. Systemd is a branch! That's the whole idea of having a branch. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
