On 2014-04-02 20:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when
> transitioning to udev from systemd-211.
>
> What we have is
> 55-lfs.rules,
> 81-cdrom.rules,
> 83-cdrom-symlinks.rules,
> write_cd_rules,
> write_net_rules, and
> init-net-rules.sh
>
On 2014-03-29 06:32, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Just a progress report. I've had some success. I can boot the same
> system to either sysd or sysv. I have a couple of short scripts to
> switch. For example:
>
> $ cat set-sysd
> #! /bin/bash
> for p in init halt poweroff reboot runlevel shutdown teli
From someone begrudgingly in the "peanut gallery", I agree. It's a simple
enough fix with a low enough risk of adversely affecting the build that it
could make it into the upcoming release. But as a far too former release
manager I also appreciate Bruce's stance too. These splinters I've got f
Hi all,
Those of you who follow lfs-book will have seen some commits fly by from
Armin, who asked to be granted access to work on the systemd branch. As
I've been lacking time recently, and lost a bit of motivation for
maintaining the branch myself, I was happy to accept the offer of help.
Welco
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 15:30 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Is it useful to update using all of this? The last four elements are
> not strictly needed for LFS. We could approach this in other ways
> though. We could create a custom Makefile or a patch for everything.
>
> What do you think?
Nice
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 13:58 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 1. Should we change the book to point at the currently available
> address or wait a while to see if the alioth site comes up?
I'd leave it as-is. That site seems to go through periods of downtime
like this, this certainly isn't the first
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 23:01 +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just a note, current svn-version referres to kbd-2.0.1-backspace-1.patch but
> only the 2.0.0 version is on the server.
Thanks for the report. I forgot to commit that patch, but it turns out
that Igor committed it on my behalf bac
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 18:22 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I didn't spot it because it's in the middle of the log, and I
> believed the message at the end -
> 533 Tests in 117 Categories Complete ... No Failures :-)
> but yes, I've got the same on the one build I logged.
Not that it matters much now
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 13:46 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/ as well as on
> > ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/conglomeration/tar/ the patch is not
> > there.
>
> Thanks for reporting. There is a bug in
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 11:44 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I have been working with make-4, tar-1.27, and util-linux-2.24-rc2.
> Make and tar are fine, but util-linux has some major problems with the
> install phase.
I tested tar a while back too and had no issues, but I saw your comment
(2) on #34
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 19:48 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I also noted "This is the last release where the old non-libmount
> mount(8) implementation is supported and maintained." Not sure if
> that will change how 2.25 has to be built, but I guess time will
> tell.
I doubt it; we already build 2.
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 12:55 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> util-linux v2.24-rc2 was released today and I've been testing it. It
> builds quite cleanly, but I have a problem with a couple of tests.
>
> The two tests for the 'last' command want to use the DNS resolver that
> is not available in the
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 19:54 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Well, I've made some progress already, just by copying and pasting the
> original xsl:template from the upstream autoidx.xsl file. I'm now
> working on adjusting it to match the current formatting. Hopefully I'll
&
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 11:25 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 00:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Matt Burgess wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheet
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 00:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
> > generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely far
> > too big to hit lfs-
Hi,
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely far
too big to hit lfs-book; the changes to our customisation layers were
minimal, the majority of the commit is adding the upstream stylesheets
and deleting the
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:36 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >
> > Darn! I hit that, changed it locally but somehow lost it prior to the
> > commit. I'll fix up tonight. In the meantime, if you haven't already
> > done so, you can use:
> >
> > PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tools/lib/pkgco
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 13:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Stable
> Version 7.4. It is a major release with toolchain updates to
> binutils-2.23.2, glibc-2.18, and gcc-4.8.1. In total, 32 packages (of
> 62) were updated from LFS-7.3 and
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 14:25 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 10:46 -0700, Walter P. Little wrote:
> >
> >> Upgrading gawk to 4.0.1 was the ticket. Thanks for the tip. Should
> >> the Host System Prerequisites page be upda
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 10:46 -0700, Walter P. Little wrote:
> Upgrading gawk to 4.0.1 was the ticket. Thanks for the tip. Should
> the Host System Prerequisites page be updated to reflect this for
> gawk?
Thanks for testing that out and confirming it's a viable workaround. I
think a note is pr
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 11:42 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I don't think tar comes with a man page. That said, I do have tar.1 and
> tar.5, but I don't recall when they were installed. They are not in the
> man-pages tarball.
Tar don't provide a man page upstream because the preferred GNU
docume
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 19:17 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> In the glibc build procedures, a simple sed to the glibc code seems to
> fix the problem:
>
> sed -i -e 's/static __m128i/inline &/' sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strstr.c
>
> I am proposing that we add this to both Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of L
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 19:33 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> The failure with 0.2.0 was a problem from my manual install
> (couldn't mount my scripts over nfs, built it from memory and let it
> install into /usr whereas my scripts move rpcbind to /sbin). So
> every time I ran /sbin/rpcbind I was runni
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 01:13 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:01:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > > 5. texinfo.
> > > FAIL: test_scripts/formatting_unknown_nodes_renamed.sh
> > >
> > > Not sure if Matt's patch fixes this.
> >
> > Don't know, but I
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 14:03 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The recommendation is because it takes too much time (over an hour on my
> system) and the tests are pretty much valueless.
No more lacking in value from other non-toolchain test suites, surely?
I understand that the time it takes to run th
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 15:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 103-automake:FAIL: t/primary-prefix-invalid-couples.tap 280 - ... and
> with the same diagnostic of 'automake -a'
> 103-automake:# FAIL: 1
I've just hit this one again. It looks like there's a patch for it at
https://lists.nongnu.org/arch
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 22:50 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Another build is underway so hopefully I'll be able to report success at
> some point tomorrow.
Yes, success of sorts. The fallocate test now passes, but I'm now
hitting the same failure as Bruce is in the 'ra
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:31 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 15:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > 086-util-linux:make[1]: make[4]: *** [check] Error 2***
> > [check-local-tests] Terminated
>
> Ah, good. I just hit that one in last night's build.
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 15:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 086-util-linux:make[1]: make[4]: *** [check] Error 2***
> [check-local-tests] Terminated
Ah, good. I just hit that one in last night's build. It's in
misc/fallocate. I haven't had a change to look into it in any depth,
but it's always rea
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 22:32 +0200, Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 10:05 PM, ra...@infdot.com wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Perl Libs Patch seems to be missing from Systemd LFS version:
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/chapter03/patches.html
> >
> > 2nd one from the bottom of the pa
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 11:47 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been working on updating perl, automake, kernel, gmp, and procps.
>
> Adding the new packages creates a couple of new errors during the make
> check process.
>
> 090-coreutils:FAIL: tests/df/skip-rootfs.sh
I've not seen that one fail,
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:41 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know whether I should raise a ticket for the
> systemd branch. For now, I make this message about my
> last build (using tweaked jhalfs, which I'll commit soon, but I
> need a few more tests).
Hi Pierre,
Could you raise ti
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 13:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 1. The latest git commit in util-linux now has a fix for umount not
> remounting the root fs read only with a 'umount -a -r' command.
>
> I'm not sure if we should fix that in LFS or just wait until the next
> release of util-linux. We do
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 21:54 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm going to write a program to automatically identify out of date
> packages for LFS. Has anyone already done such a beast?
>
> As I review the packages, it seems that the only constant is
> inconsistency. Trying to parse versions is qui
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 02:06 -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 16:14 +0800, xinglp wrote:
> > We should
> > move http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/bc.html to
> > lfs.
>
> I agree that almost any use-able Linux system will have bc, but I'm not
> sure it belongs i
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 22:03 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Whether or not one can, following the 'rewrite in a subset of C++' in
> 4.8.0, now do --enable-languages=c++ on GCC's configure line and get a
> working C++ compiler sans C support 'baggage' is an interest
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 15:52 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Pierre Labastie wrote:
> >> When switching to gcc 4.8.0, the test of g++ was added to
> >> version-check.sh, but not to the list of requirements. Only GCC appears,
> >> which could be anything from the gcc executable to
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 22:22 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> When switching to gcc 4.8.0, the test of g++ was added to
> version-check.sh, but not to the list of requirements. Only GCC appears,
> which could be anything from the gcc executable to the whole compiler
> collection. Maybe this should
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 21:35 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Billy O'Connor wrote:
> > I'm seeing this output from:
> >
> > grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
> >
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/lib");
> >
> > Seems reasonable, we're removing the /tools prefixes from everythi
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:48 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > On 04/01/2013 11:45 AM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 10:16 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> >>> Confused again :)
> >>>
> >>> Is the following still requi
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 10:16 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> Confused again :)
>
> Is the following still required with this --disable-install-libiberty
> switch?
>
> from the book...
> Workaround a bug so that GCC doesn't install libiberty.a, which is
> already provided by Binutils:
> sed -i 's/insta
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 09:35 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> This is in the Change log for the the SVN book that I just rendered
>
> [matthew] - Upgrade to Udev-lfs-198-3 to fix issues with libdrm
> installation in BLFS. Thanks to Nico P for the report, and to Armin for
> the fix.
>
> In this section
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 13:41 -0500, William Harrington wrote:
> Proper command: ln -sfv ../../lib/libprocps.so.1.1.1 /usr/lib/
> libprocps.so
Thanks! Fixed in r10235.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe:
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 13:55 +0800, xinglp wrote:
> 2013/3/30
> -e '/\*startfile_prefix_spec:/{n;s@.*@/usr/lib/ @}' \
> --e '/\*cpp:/{n;s@$@ -isystem /usr/include@}' > \
> +-e '/\*cpp:/{n;s@$@ -isystem /usr/include@}' & \
> You should not change > to &
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:36 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'd still prefer something along the line of "Hey, this package builds
> something we really don't need here, but breaks the build because it has
> not caught up with newer tools. We'll just skip that here and fix it
> properly in Chapter
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:06 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I agree that we shouldn't go out of the way to disable unneeded portions
> of builds, but I do not think we should be fixing them if they are
> broken either. If they cause a problem, then disable them in Chapter 5.
> The only time they
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:51 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> matt...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> > Author: matthew
> > Date: Fri Mar 29 12:37:50 2013
> > New Revision: 10230
> >
> > Log:
> > Fix Binutils' texinfo file in pass1 and pass2 in case hosts
> have Texinfo >= 5.1 installed.
> >
> > Modi
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:41 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:47 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
> > FYI, there's --disable-install-libiberty configure option - no need for
> > seds to prevent its installation.
>
> Well spotted. I'm testing
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 07:02 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 03/29/2013 04:18 AM, xinglp wrote:
> > log is
> >
> > ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:325: unknown command `colophon'
> > ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:336: unknown command `cygnus'
> >
> >
> >
>
> I noticed that l
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 21:41 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Also, while you are at it: gcc-4.8.0 texinfo files accept the new
> version of makeinfo (with some warnings, but without errors). There is
> no need to build them in chapter 5 (but the wording "they are broken" is
> not true anymore),
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:47 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> FYI, there's --disable-install-libiberty configure option - no need for
> seds to prevent its installation.
Well spotted. I'm testing a build with that in now.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: h
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 20:13 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Please apply this patch to udev-lfs
>
> Add -Wl,--no-undefined for linker to detect missing symbols in
> libudev.so. Replace 'nm /lib/libc.so.6' with 'objdump -T /lib/libc.so.6'
> since the former doesn't work if library has been stripped.
>
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 20:27 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
> I'm about to kick off another build, so will check and update trunk if
> needs be.
The same fix needed to be done on trunk, but after committing that fix
(r10211) I spotted other keymaps needed to be installed so fixed that u
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 15:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> When updating the udev-lfs tarball, we need to also check the build and
> install of gudev, keymap, and GObject Files. I just found an error in
> systemd-extras in blfs using the current stable lfs release.
OK, thanks for the note.
> I ha
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 14:57 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Please add --with-sysroot to the configure switches in binutils-pass2.
> It is harmless (just adds a feature to ld), and corrects that bug.
I think you meant --with-build-sysroot, right? The configure help
output for that says
--with-
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:39 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> I guess the /etc/localtime link should be the other way around:
> ln -s /usr/share/zoneinfo/ /etc/localtime
>
> (and also could be ln -sv)
Thanks again! Fixed in r10196.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinf
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 14:05 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Billy O'Connor wrote:
> > I dl'd the book sources and rendered it, then built a new LFS.
> > Looks great, as always. I must have fat-fingered something in chapter
> > 5, though, because the configure script for check-0.9.9 didn't pick up
> >
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:09 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Kevin Lyda wrote:
> > Sorry! Didn't see the release happening. Hopefully it's a step you could
> > add to the release process.
> >
> > I do update it based on wikipedia updating their misspelling page, so pip
> > install --upgrade misspellings
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 20:53 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 08:43 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> >
> > BUt now I've got to figure out why an LFS build doesn't generate/install
> > that man page!
>
> For all man pages, libxslt and docbook-{xml,xsl} are nee
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:28 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I don't understand what machine-id is, but if it changes with something
> (e.g. boot), then the entry in /etc should be a symlink to /var. If's
> it's constant after creation (e.g. /etc/sshd/ keys), then the entry in
> /var should be a sy
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> It seems that now "make install" has no remap at all ;-)
> Actually, I am not sure 'dbus-uuidgen --ensure' is needed
> because according to the documentation (man 5 machine-id),
> the dbus machine-id file (/var:lib/dbus/machine-id) could
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 11:14 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I agree completely with Pierre on this one. There really is no reason
> I can think of that XML::Parser cannot have its own page for package
> management simplicity.
I agree with Randy, Bruce, and half-with, half-against Pierre :-)
I thi
On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 20:29 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> There are (at least) to places in the systemd book
> where post install instructions are inside a
> tag.
>
> for dbus:
> dbus-uuidgen --ensure
>
> for systemd:
> systemd-machine-id-setup
>
> I suggest they are moved to a remap="config
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:37 +, Jason Daly wrote:
> While building LFS 7.3 I discovered a small error.
>
> 6.51. Kbd-1.15.5
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/kbd.html
>
> The third sed command has an extraneous "&&" appended.
Thanks. Fixed in 10184.
Regards,
Matt.
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 21:45 +0100, Denis Mugnier wrote:
> The "http://refspecs.freestandards.org"; website is unavailable. It is
> only a trouble with me ?
It doesn't appear to be just you. I can't reach it either. I think
Bruce meant to put http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/lsb.shtml in the
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 17:21 +, John Burrell wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right place for this - I'm sure you'll let me know if
> it isn't.
It certainly is the right place, and thanks for testing!
> I had the following problems with a systemd setup:
>
> glibc-2.17-fhs-1.patch
>
> is i
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:47 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> So perhaps we should just disable them again ? I've given up
> caring wither way, I'd just like the book to be consistent in what
> is documented ;-)
Like you, I'm not particularly fussed either way. As it's useless
without a BLFS package
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 19:29 +, John Burrell wrote:
> >
> > The libcap2_2.22-orig.tar.gz link is broken.
> >
> > You have libcap_2.22.orig.tar.gz
> >
> > It should be:
> >
> > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libc/libcap2/libcap2_2.22.orig.tar.gz
> > as in blfs.
> >
>
> In fact it wou
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 23:17 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
> I think it's probably fine too. I probably won't have time to run a
> test build this weekend with it in though.
So, I managed to carve out some time :-) I've decided to upgrade
IPRoute2 as well, so as we ge
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 17:13 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Tobias Gasser wrote:
> >
> > for the kernel i'd like to see the 3.8 branch in lfs 7.3, as 3.7 won't
> > be a LTS kernel. i just finished a complete 7.3rc build (including xfce,
> > mozilla, gimp, libreoffice, qemu) with kernel 3.8 without any
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:20 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> We need to do the
> following in all three builds of gcc:
>
> sed -i -e 's/BUILD_INFO=info/BUILD_INFO=/' gcc/configure
>
> This just omits the gcc*.info files (3 files) and avoids building the
> useless info files in Chapter 5.
Great, ni
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:28 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> >
> > I think that's the problem. My host (Fedora 18) calls my eth0 device
> > p5p1.
>
> What on earth are they doing? The link
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/sy
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 14:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
> > On 02/13/2013 08:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Armin K. wrote:
> >>> lfs net-rules are prefixed with 70 while systemd net rules are prefixed
> >>> with 80. systemd net rules are ran *after* lfs ones and they basicaly
> >>>
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:01 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > you may have noticed or probably read in other articles that systemd
> > introduced a new device naming scheme starting with version 197. Doing
> > nothing
> > will result in device names like enp5s0 in
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:20 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Hm, am I missing something or D-Bus isn't there? It's required iirc ...
> You can't run systemd without it.
Err, whoops :-) I told you I hadn't run a build yet, and there's the
proof! If you give me an hour or so, I'll add it in.
Regards,
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 17:20 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Alright, no problem. I'll do the polishing thing then.
Lovely, thanks, that branch is all yours now :-) If there's anything
you want a hand with, feel free to shout!
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FA
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Well, I am trying to keep LFS and LFS Systemd as close as possible -
> that's all. In that case, we would just need to change ENABLE_LOG=0 in
> init-functioins for systemd branch.
OK then, at least I understood it correctly :-) The patch is
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 00:27 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Still no one replied about the patch :(
OK, I guess I just don't quite get it :-)
I see that it allows one to configure whether or not stuff is logged
to /run/var/bootlog. I think the comments in your original email mean
that:
1) Logging to
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 23:50 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 01:22 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> > Not useful for systemd since it logs anything to journal. Still enable
> > it by default on LFS.
> >
> > I guess we would want to use this for lfs/systemd branch, but we need
> > some kind of new bootsc
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 12:55 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just ran my script that cleans up extraneous spaces from blank lines and
> at the end of lines in all the .xml files. The commit will probably not show
> up in -book as it is large. Editors (or anyone with a sandbox of curren
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 01:22 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> Matt, since you removed Sysvinit package from LFS Systemd branch, I
> wonder if we should add it back, but only make it install few utils. All
> distros that use Systemd still ship package as "systemd-utils" which
> contains the following uti
Hi all,
I've just created a systemd branch for LFS. The intention behind this
is to provide a version of the book with systemd fully integrated,
without the need for post-lfs changes. This in no way means that
systemd will make it into the book at any point, but it should help
folks out that wan
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 15:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> See ticket #3095.
>
> I'm starting to write the instructions for updating procps to procps-ng.
> Right now we remove the kill command from procps because it is
> installed in util-linux. Is there really a preference?
Arguments I can com
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 20:01 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 01:21:26PM -0600, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > After reviewing logs I ended up having to block the wget user agent in
> > Apache for the time being. Pages such as
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 10:49 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 30/12/2012 02:07, g@free.fr a écrit :
> >>> I also got a failure in the coreutils test suite:
> >>> FAIL: test-getlogin
> >>> ===
> >>> test-getlogin.c:48: assertion failed
> >>>
> > This is fixed by upstream commit
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 21:40 -0800, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I would like to propose adding gptfdisk to LFS.
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/gptfdisk/
> >
> > It allows creation and management of GUID Partition Table (GPT) disks
> > usi
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 20:51 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Did a test build too. I applied the patch I sent yesterday for binutils.
>
> Le 29/12/2012 02:41, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> > Following up with results from a build of SVN-20121228
> >
> >> 071-glibc
Same failures and conformance test numb
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 17:30 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Also, the number of tests is 184 now. They all passed. But the book
> still states that
> the number of tests is 166.
Thanks again! Fixed in r10081.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:/
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 19:52 +0800, xinglp wrote:
> Use this ftp://ftp.gmplib.org/pub/gmp-5.1.0/gmp-5.1.0.tar.xz for now.
Thanks. Fixed in r10080.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above informa
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:27 +0800, xinglp wrote:
> I sure we need to change HAVE___SECURE_GETENV to HAVE_SECURE_GETENV in
> udev-lfs-196-3/cfg.h when update to glibc-2.17.
It's in the updated udev-lfs-196-4 that I updated in the same commit as
Glibc-2.17.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscr
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 23:24 +0100, g@free.fr wrote:
> the remaining process are
> 23812 pts/0SN 0:00 /bin/sh ./test_one ../../tests/f_mmp
> 23813 pts/0SN52:27 ../debugfs/debugfs -w f_mmp.tmp
> 23814 pts/0SN13:49 cat /dev/zero
>
> So the issue is in tests/f_mmp.tmp
>
>
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 12:49 -0700, John Joganic wrote:
> I have put that in place, and it does appear to resolve the issue.
>
> Is there a process in the LFS community to update the instructions?
> Given that, as written, the process can break the host, it seems
> appropriate to at least include
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 23:34 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 20:44 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> >
> >> it's a SATA drive. I'm pretty sure all of those show up as SCSI.
> >
> > That's what I
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 20:44 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> it's a SATA drive. I'm pretty sure all of those show up as SCSI.
That's what I thought as well, hence the sd* name, rather than hd*.
> What does a udevadm info --attribute-walk on this device's /sys
> directory show?
Attached.
Thanks!
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:12 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Checking against a slightly older build with udev 182, I only have two
> entries in /dev/disk/by-path, /dev/hda (CD-ROM) and /dev/sdc (which
> appears to be a leftover usb entry).
Ah, now, there's a bit of a clue. Plugging in a USB stick
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 03:25 +0800, xinglp wrote:
>
> But will you also check why the ethernet interface not bring up on
> boot issue.
>
> I met this in vmware system with a vmxnet3 interface. but I can bring
> it up by execute "modprobe vmxnet3".
> This may also happen in other situation, but not
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> If it is this, then it should be reasonably obvious from the udevadm
> test output I'd expect, but a full test would be something like:
>
> udevadm info -q env -p /sys/class/block/
OK, attached. That is from a fixed copy of the cfg.h fil
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:42 -0800, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Hmm, did the Makefile changes for 196 handle the changes where upstream
> made both blkid and kmod optional? We now need to add a couple new
> defines if we want that to work right, otherwise IMPORT{builtin}="blkid"
> won't actually do any
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 21:10 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
> Actually, my symptoms are slightly different. I only
> get /dev/disk/by-id. I get no other symlinks
> (by-uuid,by-label,by-path). I wonder whether this is some kind of race
> condition, whereby the first symlink gets crea
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:42 +, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 18:13 +0800, xinglp wrote:
> > The Udev-196 only create "/dev/disk/by-path".
>
> Confirmed. I'll take a look.
Actually, my symptoms are slightly different. I only
get /dev/disk/by-id
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
