Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/22/2020 4:01 PM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote: There are lots of ways to do this, and room for error in all of them. We all have our favorites ++ One concern in this discussion was "negative" numbers when using the

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet
I did plumb bobs and the angle, and could find no discernable error between the measurements. If the plane's not level, no method is going to be accurate, plumb bobs included. There are lots of ways to do this, and room for error in all of them. We all have our favorites, so I'll just stick w

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/22/2020 3:31 PM, Flesner via KRnet wrote: The example below ( if it comes through) shows how the big guys do it. Fuselage station "0" is not even located on the fuselage. I was afraid that

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/22/2020 1:08 PM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote: I'm not sure there's any real reduction in error possibiliy here, and the main problem I see is that you're trying to measure with accuracy to a point that you can't hang a tape measure on. +

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Chris Kinnaman via KRnet
--Original Message- Subject: Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt Larry Flesner wrote: >> I would suggest some distance from the main gear contact point (the axle) out ahead of any point of the aircraft. That makes all numbers positive. << Then Langford wrote: the main problem I see is that

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread John Bouyea via KRnet
use a different spinner back plate and all your measurements go out the window. Use the wing LE, the firewall or some other airframe structure and it never moves. End of my campaign... Bou -Original Message- Subject: Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt Larry Flesner wrote: >> I woul

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet
Larry Flesner wrote: >> I would suggest some distance from the main gear contact point (the axle) out ahead of any point of the aircraft. That makes all numbers positive. << I'm not sure there's any real reduction in error possibiliy here, and the main problem I see is that you're trying to

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/21/2020 8:04 PM, Jeff Scott via KRnet wrote: However, it has become more common now days to project a point some fixed distance forward from a fixed point on the aircraft. For example, the datum might be 6' forward of the bottom of the front of the firewall. +++

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-21 Thread Jeff Scott via KRnet
"John Bouyea via KRnet" > To: "'KRnet'" > Cc: "John Bouyea" > Subject: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt > > In an effort to improve aviation safety and reduce the chance of calculation > errors, attached is an excerpt of the KR2 Wt & Bal procedur