Netters:
The UPS man visited me again today and left my new "Great Plains" 5 Pt.
engine mount today which has finally brought an unknown to a head.
The mount is made to be secured to the Firewall with 1/2" AN bolts but
the plans show a "Rand Mount" that uses smaller (4) bolts on each of of
(4) s
for FLYING and the time for building
is OVER.
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
---Original Message---
From: D F Lively
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 05/10/06 20:25:46
To: KRnet
Subject: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
Netters:
The UPS man visited me again today and left my new &qu
age---
>
> From: D F Lively
> Date: 05/10/06 20:25:46
> To: KRnet
> Subject: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
>
> Netters:
>
> The UPS man visited me again today and left my new "Great Plains" 5 Pt.
> engine mount today which has finally brought an unknown
Unless you are making your forward deck removable, I would highly
recommend installing nut plates on aluminum plate. At some point you may
want to remove the engine mount.
Regards,
Steve Glover
KR-2 N902G
AJO, Ca
-Original Message-
The question I have is what is used on the interior f
Steve:
I am following Mark Langford's lead and making the deck removable but nither
of the (3) different plans sets I have address the atachment details.
This project that I took over has the lower mount to firewall hols in the
proper location but the uppers do not match probably done for a 4 p
At 09:09 PM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
>I guess I will use some 1/8" thk alluminum between the wood and a washer and
>then castle nut & cotter pin. Should get the Nose Gear from Diehl within a
>week or so
>Don
> +
I'm using a four point HAPI VW
- Original Message -
From: "D F Lively"
To: "KRnet" ; "Steve Glover"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
> Steve:
>
> I am following Mark Langford's lead and making the deck r
Larry
Thanks.
The RR plans do not give any clue and on top of it the GP 5pt mount has 5/8"
4130
tube with integral round steel bearing plates on the Engine side and it just
seemed like something beyond a "Wood Washer" would be needed on the cabin side
but no clue. I was thinking 1/8" aluminum f
KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
> email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
> --
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "D F Lively"
> To: "KRnet" ; "Steve Glover"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9
t; nylock
>> nut, which is easy.
>>
>> Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
>> see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
>> email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
>> ----------
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>
This comming from a Person who has experience How have you been
Steve???
Lee
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Glover"
To: "'KRnet'"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
> Unless you are making
uot;Steve Glover"
> To: "'KRnet'"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:48 PM
> Subject: RE: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
>
> > Unless you are making your forward deck removable, I would highly
> > recommend installing nut plates on aluminum plate.
gt;> To: "'KRnet'"
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:48 PM
>> Subject: RE: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
>>
>> > Unless you are making your forward deck removable, I would highly
>> > recommend installing nut plates on aluminum
---
> >
> > Lee Van Dyke wrote:
> >
> >> This comming from a Person who has experience How have you
> been
> >> Steve???
> >>
> >> Lee
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Steve Glover"
> >&
So, what difference does it make. Seems to make more sense to have the
nuts where you can easily see them.
---Original Message---
F A A convention recommends that the bolt heads be foreward, Virg
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
See you in Mt. Verno
> Engine Mount @ Firewall
So, what difference does it make. Seems to make more sense to have the
nuts where you can easily see them.
---Original Message---
F A A convention recommends that the bolt heads be foreward, Virg
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the p
> So, what difference does it make. Seems to make more sense to have
> the
> nuts where you can easily see them.
>
> ---Original Message---
>
>
> F A A convention recommends that the bolt heads be forward,
> Virg
>
I agree with Dan and so does the inspector the finaled
If the nuts on the backside come off, it takes longer for the
engine
to pull the bolts out. For the real reason, talk to an A&P, Virg
On Fri, 12 May 2006 07:20:57 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) "Dan Heath"
writes:
> So, what difference does it make. Seems to make more sense to have
> th
Most of your certified aircraft have the bolts going from inside out,so that
you can put torque stripes on the nuts to make sure there is no movement.And
for added protection I would use a bolt and nut that you can cotter pin.But
I like as much safety as possible.Just my thoughts.
Bob Glidden
E
Why??
Steve Bray
Jackson, Tennessee
>From: VIRGIL N SALISBURY
>Reply-To: KRnet
>To: kr...@mylist.net
>Subject: Re: KR> Engine Mount @ Firewall
>Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:38:53 -0400
>
> F A A convention recommends that the bolt heads be foreward, Virg
>
&g
See previous posts, Virg
On Fri, 12 May 2006 20:01:40 -0500 "Steve Bray"
writes:
>
> Why??
> Steve Bray
> Jackson, Tennessee
>
>
>
>
> >From: VIRGIL N SALISBURY
> >Reply-To: KRnet
> >To: kr...@mylist.net
> >Subject: Re: K
21 matches
Mail list logo
