> [Original Message]
> From:
> To:
> Date: 11/5/2004 9:51:38 AM
> Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 346, Issue 194
>
> Send KRnet mailing list submissions to
> kr...@mylist.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet
> or, via email
I have read with interest the ltrs. to the Net re. the concern many
pilots have in the ground handling of a tail dragger KR type.As Danny
DiVito says in a current T.V. commercial, "Lies, all lies." Tail draggers are
not the prop chewing wing tip destroyers they are credited with bei
Colin & bev Rainey
Just want to let you know what a nice job you did in explaining the
anatomy of a taildragger landing. It was a lot better, more complete, than my
effort.
When I went thru flight training the Navy wanted landings to be tail
wheel first. Make sure the hook enga
Hi gang, here I go again,
I am going to risk the possibility of another personal attack on my
building know-how by asking for help in a problem I have with the KR plans.
In checking the plans, Drawing #2 for the KR2, [this sheet is included ,
as you know ] in plans for the KR2S I che
KRnet members and KR builders,
Before this goes any further I wish to apologize for a stupid mistake I
made in my letter re. wing incidence as given in the RR plans. Kenneth Jones
very diplomatically pointed out my error. I had used the radius instead of
the circumference in my calcula
I am surprised at the negative consensus regarding the 23012 airfoil. In
addition to the certified a/c already mentioned George Pereira used it on his
Osprey 2, although his wing is very different than the KR. I do think the
subject has been exhausted.
Mark, I feel that I have an adva
Somehow my message was sent while I was still writing it. I told you I am
still learning to use this computer.
To continue, I realize thatmany of the people who contribute to your KRnet
have more experience and more impressive qualifications. I am not writing this
in a spirit of self aggran
There is one more point I should like to make concerning my request for
opinions regarding the strength of 3/16" ply webs on 23012 airfoil spars. I
was not asking for opinions on the airfoil. I was disappointed, and not a
little irritated to find myself the subject of comments concerning my g
Please bear with me as this is a new computer and I'm having a little trouble
getting used to it. The question I have for anyone who would care te express
an opinion concerns the airfoil for a KR2S. The design I would like to use is
the one Roy Marsh developed for the KR2S prototype. It is a
on BOTH FACES of both spars.
,
robert tallini
robertjtall...@earthlink.net
Why Wait? Move to EarthLink.
10 matches
Mail list logo
