Hi Dan, this is the one for you
http://www.westach.com/gauge_images/2C5-56.gif
Paul Smith
Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
pk.sm...@bigpond.net.au
http://kr2spacemodulator.blogspot.com/
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf
Of bobby burington
KR Kip is in based in Maine, although may still be at his winter home in
Florida. I'd suggest contacting Kip. A quick search of the databases at
Landings.com shows him at:
LOUNSBURY JR, JOSEPH ENOCH
766 ENFIELD RD
LINCOLN, ME, 04457-4152
Jeff Scott
Los Alamos, NM
-- Original Messag
Anyone have a KR somewhere near Maine and would be willing to give
me a demo ride? Taildragger or tricycle gear is fine.
Thanks!
-Dj
Check with EAA. I am sure they can tell where you can get an endorsement in
your area.
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
See you at the 2009 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Ill
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for Flying
has begun.
Daniel R.
Anyone have a KR somewhere near Maine and would be willing to give
me a demo ride? Taildragger or tricycle gear is fine.
Thanks!
-Dj
DJ, yes if you go at it that way.getting a new rating, but not simply an
endorsement, complies with the requirements for the BFR. Always a good thing,
in my opinion to add new ratings, thus new flying skills to one's repertoire.
As Oscar said, each 150/152 is going to be somewhat differen
I have just returned from yet another beautiful flight in the Wisconsin skies.
The wind is right down the runway at 11 mph and the skies are clear. The
horizon was visible 360°. I now have 3.1 flight hours on the engine since it
was rebuilt. So far all is perfect except when I checked the belly
On 04/10/2009 09:39 AM, Dana Overall wrote:
>
> My thinking with a BFR is get something out of it rather than just get a
> pencil log book entry.
Hi Dana,
I agree. My thinking is that what I'd be getting out of the BFR is
learning a new skill, flying a taildragger airplane. For my last BF
I have flown a vairety of taildraggers, but have not logged a lot of
time overall in them, due to thier not being as readily available as
try-cycle planes at clubs and fbo's. That being said, I would
reccommend trying out several different birds, if you can find them.
It's been my experience that
The SAE-1 and SAE-2 prop flange standards only really specify the Bolt Circle
Diameter as 4-3/8 for SAE-1 and 4-3/4 for SAE-2. The problem with that
standard is that there are still a ton of variables such as drive lug size (5/8
vs 3/4), drive lug depth, bolt size (3/8, 7/16, or 1/2), whether t
Hi Dan,
Here are some links to try for the O2 gauge with an analog needle
http://www.turboneonstore.com/customer/product.php?productid=381&cat=0&bestseller=Y
http://faculty.ccp.edu/faculty/dreed/Campingart/jettatech/afr/index.htm
http://westach.com/
Hope this helps
Bobby Burington
Califor
Absolutely, YMMV:-)
My thinking with a BFR is get something out of it rather than just get a pencil
log book entry. Let the instructor have you short field land it, no flap
landing, pull the power on you, soft field land itget something out of the
instructor time, use him. If one is try
What's the big difference in the SAE 1 and SAE-2 Prop flanges is it
just the bolt pattern or is it the weight of the prop it will handle or both
etc. I know most are using a SAE-1 Prop flange but I can get either one or
both. Does prop size come into the mix or the number of blades o
Well, I guess the old saying "your results may vary" applies to flying the
Texas Taildragger conversion of the Cessna 150/152. It's been a few years
since I flew that one and Dana's comments don't jibe with my experience flying
a C150/150 but then again it's because it was a 150 and not a 152,
At 06:12 AM 4/10/2009, you wrote:
>**I believe he was looking simply for tail wheel time to, as he
>said, "see what it is like".
>I flew in a converted 150 last week and it was flat out squirely. **
=
I think Dan's point was "that's not what flying
> From: bo12...@hotmail.com
>
> Dan, although I
agree the tail wheel time in a converted C152 will be similar to a KR,
I believe he was looking simply for tail wheel time to, as he said,
"see what it is like".
My bad, I meant "I agree the tail wheel time in a converted C152 will NOT be
simila
Dan, although I agree the tail wheel time in a converted C152 will be similar
to a KR, I believe he was looking simply for tail wheel time to, as he said,
"see what it is like". I flew in a converted 150 last week and it was flat out
squirely. I would recommend one spend more than one hour g
It won't be at all similar. I got a little stick time in an RV and it was
similar. I believe that all that you will accomplish by getting time in the
152, will be to convince you that you must convert it to a nose wheel.
If you do buy the plane and want to convert it to a nose wheel, which I am
Have one of those, in the trash now, never could see it. I was really
hoping that there was a gauge with a needle that moved across it so you
could really see the reading. Being a little big Red Green color blind,
makes these impossible to see in bad lighting conditions for me.
See N64KR at http
19 matches
Mail list logo
