On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 June 2015 13:40:51 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 12:28:29 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pali Rohár
> > > wrot
On Wednesday 24 June 2015 13:40:51 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 12:28:29 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:40:14 Joshua Joseph
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 June 2015 12:28:29 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:40:14 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Pal
On Wednesday 24 June 2015 12:28:29 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:40:14 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Then post your i
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:40:14 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > Then post your interface for review and comments.
> > >
> > > See it here:
> >
> https://githu
On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:40:14 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > Then post your interface for review and comments.
> >
> > See it here:
> https://github.com/josh-wambua/kopete/blob/database_helper/plugins/history3/databasehelper.
Hi
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >
> Then post your interface for review and comments.
>
> See it here:
https://github.com/josh-wambua/kopete/blob/database_helper/plugins/history3/databasehelper.h
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.ro...@gmail.com
> _
On Monday 22 June 2015 12:53:08 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >
> > > Joshua
> >
> > Ok, looks good. Maybe also timestamp and message should not be null...
> >
> > Now to implement it!
> >
> >
> Yes...I am now working on the Db classes.
>
Then pos
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > Joshua
>
> Ok, looks good. Maybe also timestamp and message should not be null...
>
> Now to implement it!
>
>
Yes...I am now working on the Db classes.
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.ro...@gmail.com
>
>
On Sunday 21 June 2015 18:44:02 m...@jtalk.me wrote:
> Why would you use TEXT type for internal identifiers? Integral
> indices are way more effective for selection.
>
It means to store full protocol dependent identifier. For jabber it
would be full JID (with resource) which is string property,
Why would you use TEXT type for internal identifiers? Integral indices are way
more effective for selection.
20.06.2015, 20:21, "Pali Rohár" :
> On Saturday 20 June 2015 17:07:06 Joshua Joseph wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Pali Rohár
>> wrote:
>> > On Saturday 20 June 2015 16:31
On Saturday 20 June 2015 17:07:06 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 June 2015 16:31:50 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Pali Rohár
> > >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 20 June 2015 15:56:05 Joshua Joseph
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 20 June 2015 16:31:50 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 June 2015 15:56:05 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Pali Rohár
> > > >
> > > >
>
On Saturday 20 June 2015 16:31:50 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 June 2015 15:56:05 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Pali Rohár
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I had not thought of that. :)
> > > > >
>
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 20 June 2015 15:56:05 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > > > I had not thought of that. :)
> > > >
> > > > > Same for Contact: Does not it make sense to store
> > > > > Kopete::Conta
On Saturday 20 June 2015 15:56:05 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > > I had not thought of that. :)
> > >
> > > > Same for Contact: Does not it make sense to store
> > > > Kopete::Contact representing room? Or do you think it is not
> > > > needed at
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >
> > I had not thought of that. :)
> >
> > > Same for Contact: Does not it make sense to store Kopete::Contact
> > > representing room? Or do you think it is not needed at all?
> >
> > Yes. I will change to Kopete::Contact.
> >
>
> I think yo
On Saturday 20 June 2015 15:22:52 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > On Friday 19 June 2015 16:54:57 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Pali Rohár
> > >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:59:17 Joshua Joseph wro
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 16:54:57 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:59:17 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Pali Rohár
> > > wrote:
>
On Friday 19 June 2015 16:54:57 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:59:17 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > I get it now.
> > > > >
> > > > > We will ha
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 09:59:17 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > I get it now.
> > > >
> > > > We will have to store the contactId() also. I will need to get good
> > > > column
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:59:17 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >
> > > I get it now.
> > >
> > > We will have to store the contactId() also. I will need to get good
> > > column names
> > > to avoid confusion with the foreign key columns.
> > >
> >
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > I get it now.
> >
> > We will have to store the contactId() also. I will need to get good
> > column names
> > to avoid confusion with the foreign key columns.
> >
>
> See my yesterday email where I proposed to store pluginId() as protocol
On Thursday 18 June 2015 20:21:42 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > > I intended for the account field to be protocol
> > > dependant, as you had said earlier, so that jabber can store full
> > > JID.
> >
> > But then you cannot show history! You will
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> >
> > I intended for the account field to be protocol
> > dependant, as you had said earlier, so that jabber can store full
> > JID.
> >
>
> But then you cannot show history! You will get Kopete::Acount::accountId
> and you cannot match anyth
On Thursday 18 June 2015 15:57:45 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 June 2015 10:58:36 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Pali Rohár
> > >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 14:20:05 Pali Rohár wr
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2015 10:58:36 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 14:20:05 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 15:11:22 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> >
On Thursday 18 June 2015 10:58:36 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 14:20:05 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 15:11:22 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > > And for handling problem with jabber resource now I got th
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2015 14:20:05 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 15:11:22 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > And for handling problem with jabber resource now I got this idea:
> > > >
> > > > What about storing this?
> > > > * proto
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2015 14:20:05 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 15:11:22 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > And for handling problem with jabber resource now I got this idea:
> > > >
> > > > What about storing this?
> > > > * proto
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 14:20:05 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2015 15:11:22 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > And for handling problem with jabber resource now I got this idea:
> > >
> > > What about storing this?
> > > * protocol
> > > * account
> > > * contact
> > > * from_id
> > > * to_id
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 15:11:22 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > And for handling problem with jabber resource now I got this idea:
> >
> > What about storing this?
> > * protocol
> > * account
> > * contact
> > * from_id
> > * to_id
> > * from_name
> > * to_name
> >
> > (from|to)_id will be full protco
Quick comments before I update the schema:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi,
>
> still I see there couple of problems:
>
> 1) Why is group_type needed which just specify protocol? Protocol is
> already present in messages table.
>
> 2) I would prefer to have integer primar
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 13:08:37 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> Pali,
> Here is an updated schema, correcting the above:
>
>
> --Groups table:
>
> CREATE TABLE "groups"(
> "group_id" Text NOT NULL ,--Unique identifier for the group
> "description" Text , -- A human readable description of the
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Great, but there are missing descriptions what column means...
>
> > CREATE TABLE "groups"(
> > "group_id" Text NOT NULL ,
> > "description" Text ,
> > "subject" Text ,
> > "group_type" Text
>
> Hm ?
>
> > );
> >
> >
> > CREATE TABLE "mess
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 12:40:10 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 20:33:36 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:58:04 Joshua Joseph wrot
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2015 20:33:36 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:58:04 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM, kaushik
> > > > wrote:
>
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 20:33:36 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:58:04 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM, kaushik
> > > wrote:
> > > > @Joshua, Can you look into these things and update the readme
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:58:04 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM, kaushik
> > wrote:
> > > @Joshua, Can you look into these things and update the readme
> > > accordingly. Do let us know when you are done with it or ha
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:58:04 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM, kaushik
> wrote:
> > @Joshua, Can you look into these things and update the readme
> > accordingly. Do let us know when you are done with it or have any
> > doubts.
>
> Sure Kaushik. I am working on it right
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:29:24 kaushik wrote:
> On 16 June 2015 at 11:10, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 10:54:15 kaushik wrote:
> > > >> And second I still do not see how you want to handle multi
> > > >> user chats correctly. You are adding session to chat message,
> > > >> but
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM, kaushik wrote:
>
>
> @Joshua, Can you look into these things and update the readme accordingly.
> Do let us know when you are done with it or have any doubts.
>
>
Sure Kaushik. I am working on it right now.
>
> ___
> k
On 16 June 2015 at 11:29, kaushik wrote:
>
>
> On 16 June 2015 at 11:10, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 16 June 2015 10:54:15 kaushik wrote:
>> > >> And second I still do not see how you want to handle multi user chats
>> > >> correctly. You are adding session to chat message, but
>> > >> Kop
On 16 June 2015 at 11:10, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2015 10:54:15 kaushik wrote:
> > >> And second I still do not see how you want to handle multi user chats
> > >> correctly. You are adding session to chat message, but
> > >> Kopete::ChatSession is not useful here. It is destroyed i
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 10:54:15 kaushik wrote:
> >> And second I still do not see how you want to handle multi user chats
> >> correctly. You are adding session to chat message, but
> >> Kopete::ChatSession is not useful here. It is destroyed if you close
> >> chat window, but some multi user chat
On 16 June 2015 at 10:25, Joshua Joseph wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> .. I do not know if these messages should be
>> > > logged or not.
>> >
>> > I think these messages (user joined, left) should be logged. They can
>> > provide
>> > context when someone
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:25:00 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > .. I do not know if these messages should be
> > > > logged or not.
> > >
> > > I think these messages (user joined, left) should be logged. They can
> > > provide
> > > context when
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> .. I do not know if these messages should be
> > > logged or not.
> >
> > I think these messages (user joined, left) should be logged. They can
> > provide
> > context when someone is reviewing the history later.
> >
>
> https://github.com/jos
On Sunday 14 June 2015 16:36:35 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Pali Rohár
wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 June 2015 16:13:39 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pali Rohár
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Quick look at database schema:
> > > >
> > > > C
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 14 June 2015 16:13:39 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pali Rohár
> > wrote:
> > > Quick look at database schema:
> > >
> > > Columns:
> > > entry_id (int, primary key)
> > > timestamp (text)
> > > protocol (
On Sunday 14 June 2015 16:13:39 Joshua Joseph wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pali Rohár
> wrote:
> > Quick look at database schema:
> >
> > Columns:
> > entry_id (int, primary key)
> > timestamp (text)
> > protocol (text) - (the protocol in use)
> > direction (text) - (either incoming
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Quick look at database schema:
>
> Columns:
> entry_id (int, primary key)
> timestamp (text)
> protocol (text) - (the protocol in use)
> direction (text) - (either incoming or outgoing)
> local_id (text) - (the account being used locally)
> rem
52 matches
Mail list logo
