Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-02-01 Thread David Faure
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 17:35:50 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > > it would fit in

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-02-01 Thread David Faure
On Friday 24 January 2014 20:33:14 Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > > > On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: > > >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > >>> On

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-28 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> > Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also includes > kwalletd which definitely is not t

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-25 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/25/2014 08:19 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: >> On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: >>> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote:

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-24 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-24 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > > On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: > >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: > >>> On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Thursday, Jan

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: >>> On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: >>> Sure, the framework it

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > attica seems

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Alex Merry
On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: >> On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: >>> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: >> Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also include

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also includes > kwalletd which definitely is not tier 2,

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > > > to ha

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-23 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear >> to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like >> it would fit in tier 1? >

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > > it wo

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Valentin Rusu
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi, > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > it would fit in tier 1? > > kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0e

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Wednesday, 2014-01-22, 17:35:50, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > > it would fit in t

Re: Tier status of attica & kwallet

2014-01-22 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > it would fit in tier 1? The library was renamed to KF5Attica in the expectation it c