On Wednesday 22 January 2014 17:35:50 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > > it would fit in tier 1? > > The library was renamed to KF5Attica in the expectation it could be a > framework but I'd appreciate someone more knowledgeable giving it an > eye over to work out if anything else needs to be done to make it a > framework.
Well, it's missing many things from ECM, since it's not using ECM at all. That makes it a bit of an odd duck. (For instance it doesn't install forwarding headers, nor a qmake .pri file, the headers don't get installed under include/KF5, etc.) If we want to make it a real framework (I'm all for it), then we need to drop the qt4 support from master and port it to ECM. (possibly after making a qt4-specific branch, of course). -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
