On 01/25/2014 08:19 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: >> On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: >>> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not >>>>>> appear >>>>>> to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks >>>>>> like >>>>>> it would fit in tier 1? >>>>>> >>>>>> kwallet is in tier 2, but since >>>>>> b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27 >>>>>> it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does >>>>>> it >>>>>> still belong in tier 2? >>>>> >>>>> kwallet-framework is still tier2, as there are no higher dependencies, >>>>> AFAIK. >>>> >>>> If it depends on anything else which is not in Qt or tier 1, it >>>> automatically becomes tier 3. It can't depend on anything which is tier >>>> 2. >>> >>> OK, then it's tier3 :-) >> >> Please make sure http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List is up to date >> then. > > Done. Also updated kde-build-metadata (minor change).
kwallet-framework.yaml in the repo will need updating too. :-) _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
