On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > it would fit in tier 1?
The library was renamed to KF5Attica in the expectation it could be a framework but I'd appreciate someone more knowledgeable giving it an eye over to work out if anything else needs to be done to make it a framework. > kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27 > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does it > still belong in tier 2? Another possibility would be to move kwalletd into a separate git repository but I guess nobody is likely to use the library without the daemon so tier 3 seems more sensible. What needs looked at there is to match up the renamed dbus interface in the daemon with the interface used by the library. I don't think the rename was necessary but it does need the dbus interface file renamed, I've submitted a patch for that to review on reviewboard. Jonathan _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
