On Wednesday, 2014-01-22, 17:35:50, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:24:37AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not appear > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks like > > it would fit in tier 1? > > The library was renamed to KF5Attica in the expectation it could be a > framework but I'd appreciate someone more knowledgeable giving it an > eye over to work out if anything else needs to be done to make it a > framework. > > > kwallet is in tier 2, but since b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27 > > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does it > > still belong in tier 2? > > Another possibility would be to move kwalletd into a separate git > repository but I guess nobody is likely to use the library without the > daemon so tier 3 seems more sensible.
I guess it mostly depends on whether KF wallet is tied to kwalletd or is a client library for any spec conformant secret service. In the first case there is no point in stripping it out, in the second case it might be viable. I have to admit I totally lost the overview over the state of transition to secret service, so that might be another unrelated framework. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
