>> I found out that I, with 3% of the people who took the test, had a
> moderate tendancy to
>> associate females with science. Not *too* big a surprise since I've been
>> good and brainwashed with female-friendly science programs, although it'd be
>> nice if I could say I had no associations.
>
On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Terri Oda wrote:
> A friend of mine sent this to our mailing list and I thought some of you
> would find it interesting:
>
> http://depts.washington.edu/iat/index.html
Very interesting! I had slight preference for young over old, and I only
took that one once.
For the othe
btw, several definitions of the good/bad things are rather
subjective...
i.e., war, the languages, et al. . .
Walt
-~
Wonder is the foundation of all philosophy, inquiry its
progress, ignorance its end.
Montaigne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Same way I expect the skin that's falsely called 'yellow' to be over
> Oriental-type features, and 'white' to be over Caucasian shapes.)
> the plumbing system being 'wrong', or noone having vegemite, but not
> that. You know?
Yeahyou're not t
strong automatic preference for young
strong automatic preference for White
slight automatic association between female and science
one time taking each.
:-)
Walt
-~
In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of defeat;
but in the evolution of real knowledge it marks the first s
> >For the race test, I had a strong automatic association with blacks
> >and 'bad' things (and I've never thought of myself as a racist
> >person, either)
Haven't done it yet, but I suspect I'll show some sort of skew on the
blacks one - I'm accustomed to seeing Euro-caucasians, orientals and
A
> I did the gender and race ones, and scored a moderate preference for
> black, which surprises the hell out of me because I am personally
> conscious of a moderate dislike/distrust of black people, or at least
> black men (black women don't bother me as much generally), and a
> strong association
Hm.. i took it twice and got inconclusive on both of them. I noticed
that I kept on putting "her" and "history" on the male side, so maybe it
was getting mad at me for hitting buttons before I read the whole thing
:)
It might be interesting to see if there are any associations with the
individu
On Mon, 01 Nov 1999 17:06:34 -0500, Amanda Knox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Very cool tests! I did all three, and found out some very interesting
>results (that I'm not very proud of *laugh*)
>For the race test, I had a strong automatic association with blacks
>and 'bad' things (and I've never th
Terri Oda wrote:
> A friend of mine sent this to our mailing list and I thought some of you
> would find it interesting:
>
> http://depts.washington.edu/iat/index.html
Very cool tests! I did all three, and found out some very interesting results (that
I'm not
very proud of *laugh*)
For the r
> I found out that I, with 3% of the people who took the test, had a moderate tendancy
>to
> associate females with science. Not *too* big a surprise since I've been
> good and brainwashed with female-friendly science programs, although it'd be
> nice if I could say I had no associations.
I had
A friend of mine sent this to our mailing list and I thought some of you
would find it interesting:
http://depts.washington.edu/iat/index.html
The tests are designed to test your implicit attitudes -- whether you make
an automatic association between certain things. The one that would be of
par
> Yeahyou're not the only one -- it's surprising (or maybe not) how many
> people, when confronted with white skin over asian bone structure, think
> (and say, aregh) 'down's syndrome' -- i still get the comment from time to
> time, but never *after* I open my mouth and my friends all think
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
