IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> > Of Jake Anderson
> > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 8:35 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from an external email dom
y for operator commands
XA TSOAUTH = OPER
XA TSOAUTH = CONSOLE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 8:35 AM
To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error
CAUTION: This
nderson
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 8:35 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from an external email domain which carries
> the additional risk that it may be a phishing email and/
Do you have the proper security for operator commands
XA TSOAUTH = OPER
XA TSOAUTH = CONSOLE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console
Classification: Confidential
Console=distributed in IEASYS00?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 3:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error
[CAUTION: This Emai
, 2021 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Console outstanding message error
This is not from console instead it is from TSO syslog from where we issue
console commands with /
On Thu, 25 Nov, 2021, 4:30 pm Seymour J Metz, wrote:
> Check the routing for that console. W
This is not from console instead it is from TSO syslog from where we issue
console commands with /
On Thu, 25 Nov, 2021, 4:30 pm Seymour J Metz, wrote:
> Check the routing for that console. What kind of console is it?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ___
Check the routing for that console. What kind of console is it?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Jake Anderson [justmainfra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
IEAVNP26 is SMS. For any more than that, I would need
a standalone dump.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" wrote on
10/19/2021 06:30:03 PM:
> From: "PINION, RICHARD W."
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 10/
Is it a reproducible wait state? Did you take a standalone dump?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 19th, 2021 at 6:30
Yes, create a large enough ZFS to hold the CONTENT and ORDER files, you will
need an equal size or better ZFS to use for temporary installation work space
later, so you might as well make them both up front. Two 3390-27's is a bit
large, but if you have the space, you should use it. You will b
When I installed 2.4 late last year I ended up with a 2-mod27 zFS for the
SMPNTS and a 2-mod27 zFS for the smpwork filesystem. Once I gave it plenty of
space the install sailed smoothly. I've always gotten my serverpac across the
internet so have no experience with DVD images. IDK if the DVD
If the Core FTP LE client is running on your local PC then you will only
need a TTLSRule to protect the FTP server. Otherwise you would need two
separate rules: one for the server and another for the client.
Assuming your FTP client is not running on Z there are two things from the
policy that I
22, 2020 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working.
In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF
UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:02:53 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working.
>
>In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF
>UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it's
>there.
>
Where I see:
Local fix
BYPAS
mmier, Rex
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier
Thx for that info...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Not
Not assigned yet. I'll let you know when I get it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Apar number?
-Original Me
Apar number?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender
Update on this. I opened a PMR on it and got a reply back from IBM that they
are opening an APAR on this.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] z/OS 2.4
Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
This is an interesting discussion.
So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to copy the JCL to SYSOUT. I am not sure what
the expectation is by the OP
But on my z/OS 2.3 system with SDSF (I
Good point. As a matter of fact, I looked at both jobs' output on both the
2.3 and 2.4 systems with SDSF.
To be completely unambiguous, I think I must be wordy & redundant (not a
poke at anyone... take that literally).
The TYPRUN=COPY job that *ran* on 2.3 displayed with complete JCL in SDSF
on b
alf
> Of Steve Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
>
> Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the
> job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL
kely) JES2.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, onl
isplay.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
This is an interesting discussion.
So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to cop
Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the
job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL shows up.
N.B.: This isn't an SDSF issue. SDSF does not run jobs, and does not spool
their output. JES2 (or 3) does that.
sas
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:50 PM Lizette Koehle
: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job:
//ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY
//IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
SDSF has a record count of 12 on the
I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job:
//ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY
//IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
SDSF has a record count of 12 on the Held Output Display panel, but only shows
11 when the job is selected. The JESJCLIN DDNAME has a
Default is MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization
this is under z/OS 2.3:
//BWTESTER JOB (xx,xx,xx),'BRIAN WESTERMAN',MSGCLASS=V,
JOB07842
//CLASS=R,NOTIFY=&SYSUID,TIME=1440,TYPRUN=COPY
00020056
//* REFER WESTERB.PDS.DATA(COMMANDZ)
Behalf Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Michael and Al
anks again,
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
>
> I get the same th
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
>
> I get
.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, i
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworke
Works for me with no issues. However I use sdsf.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization.
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe
Monk
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427
Joe
On Tue, Jun 16
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427
Joe
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:30:42 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
>Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.
Chuck Norris doesn't need a a Web App to apply PTFs, he just roundhouse kicks
them in.
Art Gutowski
General Motors, LLC
arthur.gutow...@g
HI Terri,
I'm happy you finally got the server up, but sorry to see that you aren't happy
with the new format of the upgrade materials for z/OS! If you'd like, please
email me your entire list, and we can work through them. Some pieces might be
fixed by changing the content of the Upgrade Work
-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
Hi Terri,
You re
Hi Terri,
You re-ran IZUSETUP, not recently right? That was made obsolete way back on
z/OS V2.1 with APAR PI54286 (2016), to move to the "modern" parmlib (IZUPRMxx)
method. I hope you still aren't using that, and don't have the server running
on your z/OS V2.1 system but rather on a higher sys
-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 8:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
On 3/26/2020 5
On 3/26/2020 5:45 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
It then immediately fails stating z/OSMF cant talk to the 2.1 lpar, because
there is no IP address under the SYSTEM tab in z/OSMF.
What do you see when you open the Systems tab? Do you see an entry for
all 5 of your sysplex members, including your z
Hi Lionel,
Seeing this now, after your more recent post on the same subject in the
other thread. Thanks, again, for the notice! We're on it...
-Sue Shumway
On 9/19/2019 8:51 AM, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
Downloaded the Sept indexed collection and found a BUG in the
1._Open_Me_First_zOS_V2R4_Adob
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:30:46 -0400, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>> >• Basic Regular expressions (BRE)
>> >• Extended Regular expressions (ERE)
>> > There seems to be no keyword differentiating these. Does that leave
>> any ambiguity.
>
>Paul,
>
>The Extended Regular expressions differs in the meta charac
LLE
> Sent: 24 July 2019 13:29
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter
>
> All,
> For many of the newly announced z/OS V2.4 functions, you might want to get an
> "education module" from here:
>
> https://githu
Very neat!
– Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: 24 July 2019 13:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter
All,
For many of the newly announced z/OS V2.4
> >• Basic Regular expressions (BRE)
> >• Extended Regular expressions (ERE)
> > There seems to be no keyword differentiating these. Does that leave
> any ambiguity.
Paul,
The Extended Regular expressions differs in the meta characters and also
support the hex character input.
> Using the word
All,
For many of the newly announced z/OS V2.4 functions, you might want to get an
"education module" from here:
https://github.com/IBM/IBM-Z-zOS/tree/master/zOS-Education/zOS-V2.4-Education
There are 60+ small PDFs that give good overall description, value, and
implementation information speci
Hi All,
I just received this handy URL for finding all the z/OS V2.4 PDFs zipped up,
and with an index! I've downloaded the file, unzipped it, and done some
searches. For what I was looking for, I found what I needed nicely.
https://t.co/eKOUGUydO8
-Marna WALLE
z/OS Install and Upgrade, IBM P
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:27:38 -0400, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>
>The Announce letter does not o into the details of the line item. The
>DFSORT Application Programming Guide has all the details that can answer
>your questions.
>
Which Susan has made available just in time:
z/OS Version 2 Release 4
DFSO
Try this URL:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4/en/homepage.html
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:59 PM Susan Shumway wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for pointing that out. I'll pass your comment on to the owner of
> the content.
>
> -Sue Shumway
>
> On 7/23/2019
Hi John,
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll pass your comment on to the owner of
the content.
-Sue Shumway
On 7/23/2019 10:33 AM, John McKown wrote:
I have found the z/OS 2.4 documentation. But it appears to be "incomplete".
On page
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0
---
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> John McKown
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 7:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:34 AM Jim Taylor wrote:
>&g
I think it stands for z Container eXtension
-- Original Message --
From: "Farley, Peter x23353"
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 23.07.2019 17:50:54
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter
John,
I'm curious - what does "zCX" stand for?
Peter
-O
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:26 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> John, is this an academic interest or your boss decided to keep the
> mainframe?
>
Purely academic. Our new owners, UnitedHealthcare, is apparently going to
try to eliminate the z9BC by doing our processing on something called
Facets. I d
John, is this an academic interest or your boss decided to keep the
mainframe?
ITschak
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:33 PM John McKown
wrote:
> I have found the z/OS 2.4 documentation. But it appears to be "incomplete".
> On page
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.i
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:51 AM Farley, Peter x23353 <
peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm curious - what does "zCX" stand for?
>
z/OS Container Extensions. It lets you run z/Linux programs on z/OS if they
are in a "Docker" container.
https://www.ibm.com/support/z-content-soluti
John,
I'm curious - what does "zCX" stand for?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 7:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter
EXTERNAL EMAIL
On Tue, Ju
equ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:27:38 -0400, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>I like the addition of "regular expressions" to DFSORT.
>
>Thank You.
>
>The
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:27:38 -0400, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>I like the addition of "regular expressions" to DFSORT.
>
>Thank You.
>
>The Announce letter does not go into the details of the line item. The
>DFSORT Application Programming Guide has all the details that can answer
>your questions. E
@David did you perhaps answer your own question?CharlesSent from a mobile;
please excuse the brevity.
Original message From: David Crayford
Date: 7/23/19 5:35 AM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re:
z/OS 2.4 Announcement Letter Why are IBM migrating from SMB
Why are IBM migrating from SMB to NFS? As a Windows user SMB is far
superior and NFS is onerous to setup and adds no value. In fact it sucks
for Windows!
On 2019-07-23 5:34 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/0/877/ENUSZP19-0410/index.h
>I like the addition of "regular expressions" to DFSORT.
John,
Thank You.
But the announcement letter doesn't state if these are BREs, EREs, or
PCREs,
although the likely change of it being PCRE is both FAT and SLIM at the
same time.
The Announce letter does not go into the details of the line
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:34 AM Jim Taylor wrote:
>
> https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/0/877/ENUSZP19-0410/index.html&request_locale=en
I like the addition of "regular expressions" to DFSORT. But the
announcement letter doesn't state if these are BREs, ERE
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:31:17 -0600, John McKown
wrote:
>>
>Yummy! Deploy z/Linux Docker containers on z/OS to run on the z/OS image
>itself. I don't know what the NoSQL VSAMDB is, but that sounds interesting
>too.
>
Interesting, yes. Enough enticement for a small shop to want to try running
Li
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>RACF<->LDAP bridge?
Sorry, but I think you are missing something.
There is already such an interface. In fact, one of my clients is using a
selfhelp web-portal for many years using a SSL LDAP server in one of my LPARs
using RACF as a LDAP Backend.
Using a LDAP client, y
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:31:17 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:13 AM Ramiro Camposagrado wrote:
>
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=AN&subtype=CA&htmlfid=899/ENUSLP19-0013&appname=USN
>>
>Yummy! Deploy z/Linux Docker containers on z/OS to run on t
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:13 AM Ramiro Camposagrado <
0218a26c8a45-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=AN&subtype=CA&htmlfid=899/ENUSLP19-0013&appname=USN
>
>
Yummy! Deploy z/Linux Docker containers on z/OS to run on the z/OS i
February 2019 16:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OS 2.4
No such plans. CICS/IMS have the same issue as z/OS. Multiple SMPE
environments to support for each "product" (4 separate environments for 4 IMS
& related products).
CICS/IMS will remain separate
multiple SMPE environments
to 1 SMPE environment, based on serverpac orderables.
(Compilers, Netview, AO, JAVA,.)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nims,Alva John (Al)
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
> Not SREL
?
How are you going to put, e.g., MVS and CICS, in the same zone?
--
Shmuel (Seymou
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
Not SREL. Various compenents were installed in their own SMP environments
(SMPE/Target/Dlib).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:01:13 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>For historical reasons, I have several SMP/E zones associated w/zOS and other
>ServerPac available items.
>I am going to consolidate all of the separate zones associated into a single
>zone
Not SREL. Various compenents were installed in their own SMP environments
(SMPE/Target/Dlib).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
How are you
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:01:13 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>For historical reasons, I have several SMP/E zones associated w/zOS and other
>ServerPac available items.
>I am going to consolidate all of the separate zones associated into a single
>zone to simplify the maintenance process.
Do you mea
y Caldwell
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
Why does anybody care what they call it. It's only going to be the same old
thing we have been dealing with for the last how many years now?. A tweak
here, a twiddle there.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
For historical reasons, I have several SMP/E zones associated w/zOS and other
ServerPac available items.
I am going to consolidate all of the separate zones associated into a single
zone to simplify the maintenance process.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Agreed, I know that. The question is will z/OS 2.4 be supported on my available
hardware.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 2:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
You
Behalf Of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
Allan Staller wrote:
>If so, I need to get my 2.3 order in before I can no longer do so.
Why not order it now? I can't think of any downside as long as you're alre
longer do so.
>
> Actually I looked at past preview announcements. I am looking for this
> one a bit early.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Beverly Caldwell
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 11:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN
Allan Staller wrote:
>If so, I need to get my 2.3 order in before I can no longer do so.
Why not order it now? I can't think of any downside as long as you're
already licensed.
Timothy Sipples
On 2/20/2019 1:47 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I think the announcement for z/OS V2.4 may be out in a month or two. Just a
guess. But I can say it is not available now.
Haha! Whatever it's gonna be called, it had better be announced before
SHARE! Otherwise, we'll be cancelling some sessions!
I think the announcement for z/OS V2.4 may be out in a month or two. Just a
guess. But I can say it is not available now.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@list
In memory of OS/390, maybe, Z os 3.4?
1.3 then 2.4... remember?
Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr. Expct
mistaks
> On Feb 20, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Beverly Caldwell wrote:
>
> Why does anybody care what they call it. It's only going to be the same old
> thing
review announcements. I am looking for this one a
bit early.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Beverly Caldwell
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
Why does anybody care what they call it. It's only
Why does anybody care what they call it. It's only going to be the same old
thing we have been dealing with for the last how many years now?. A tweak
here, a twiddle there.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:43 AM Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM <
kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote:
> Is it named V2.4 or V3.1 o
On 2/18/2019 11:42 PM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM wrote:
Is it named V2.4 or V3.1 or ...?
Though highly likely, it is indeed quite presumptuous to assume it will
remain version 2.
The few references I saw about the z/OS version after 2.3 was named "the z/OS
version after 2.3".
Oft
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:19:47 +, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
>Any bets on it being renamed from "z/OS" to IBM Z OS?
>Or, like Apple, call it "the new z/OS"..
>
Stupidity of that sort badly breaks tools such as GNU autoconfigure.
IBM seems to have relented: "uname -a" continues (after the
zPlatform Services)
Sent: 19 February 2019 07:51
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OS 2.4
Classification: Public
Whenever I've seen something about the next release of z/OS, IBM have always
referred to it as "the release after z/OS x.x". I suspect it's in c
; – Vignesh
> Mainframe Infrastructure
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services)
> Sent: 19 February 2019 07:51
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OS 2.4
>
> Classification:
9 07:51
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OS 2.4
Classification: Public
Whenever I've seen something about the next release of z/OS, IBM have always
referred to it as "the release after z/OS x.x". I suspect it's in case the
marketing department notice and decid
/Series System Programmer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: 19 February 2019 07:43
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
-- This email has reached the Bank via an ex
Is it named V2.4 or V3.1 or ...?
The few references I saw about the z/OS version after 2.3 was named "the z/OS
version after 2.3".
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: 18 February, 2019 19
96 matches
Mail list logo
