Re: IBM ShopzSeries web site blocking orders.

I found and corrected the error and now everything works as it should. The file I uploaded for the current maintenance level did not have the .bin file extension. Ooops! Sorry for the confusion on my part. Best Regards, Claude --

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

Doing a search on NoSQLz, I find that was developed by Thierry Falissard. There is a copy on the CBT tape (file 910). On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 17:24:56 +, Amr@Systemz wrote: > >There was a product called NoSQLz about 10 years ago. Is EzNoSQL the same >product ? On Tuesday, July 22, 2025 a

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:33:33 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: >Re slashes: they have a LOT of meaning in IBM-land. That's why it's a z900 >(z9, z17, whatever) that runs z/OS, z/VM, etc.: slash = software, no >slash=hardware. Nowadays. At least on Z...and nowadays, parts of IBM haven't >got the memo

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

; Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 2:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 External Message: Use Caution /E ? I would bet it is older than 90's. And the only things I remember now are SMP/E and TSO/E. From the other hand I remember plenty of /ESA's.

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

rd who enforced branding etc. are gone. Sad. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 4:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 It was yet another "2" in the family PS/2 - Persona

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

It was yet another "2" in the family PS/2 - Personal System 2 Note, some PS/2 models were not intended to run OS/2, so there was no 1:1 relationship. Regarding DB/2  - I added the slash intentionally, to keep consistency ;-) -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 23.07.2025 o 20:53, Ton

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

• 1600 International Dr. • Suite 500 • McLean, VA 22102 > DMInc.com > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Pommier, Rex > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 3:28 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Ann

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

Core. Tysons Corner • 1600 International Dr. • Suite 500 • McLean, VA 22102 DMInc.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 3:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

July 23, 2025 2:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 That's what I always heard. Might be lost in the mists of time...! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lennie Bradshaw Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

That's what I always heard. Might be lost in the mists of time...! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lennie Bradshaw Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 3:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 I thought DB2 gained its 2

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

I thought DB2 gained its 2 from being the database systems after IMS (DB1?) Lennie -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: 23 July 2025 19:53 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 at 14:38

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 at 14:38, Radoslaw Skorupka < 0471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > To complement: "2" > OS/2 was new OS, not new version of PC-DOS. > DB/2 was new database, not new version of IMS > etc. As with z/OS and System z (and variations), there was some marketing

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

w Skorupka Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 2:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 To complement: "2" OS/2 was new OS, not new version of PC-DOS. DB/2 was new database, not new version of IMS etc. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 23.07.2025 o 20:

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

further. The /ESAs make sense--same as /XA. Or /SP, for that matter. Those were at least meaningful suffixes! /E, not so much. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 2:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU S

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

oslaw Skorupka Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 2:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 /E ? I would bet it is older than 90's. And the only things I remember now are SMP/E and TSO/E. From the other hand I remember plenty of /ESA's. VM/ESA, MVS/ESA.

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

or the old-timers who remember when IBM went through a phase of adding /E to things in the 1990s) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Amr@Systemz Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 1:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2 There was

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:46:34 +, Timothy Sipples wrote: >https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/zos-32-unlocks-value-z17 > >What’s your favorite new feature? > Support has been added to enhance the capabilities of the data set file system by representing data set characteristics suc

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

NoSQLz/E! (for the old-timers who remember when IBM went through a phase of adding /E to things in the 1990s) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Amr@Systemz Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 1:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces z

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

There was a product called NoSQLz about 10 years ago. Is EzNoSQL the same product ? On Tuesday, July 22, 2025 at 01:14:04 AM MDT, Farley, Peter <031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: I like the EzNoSQL additions for COBOL and python.  Should be a lot of fun to explore

Re: IBM Announces z/OS 3.2

I like the EzNoSQL additions for COBOL and python. Should be a lot of fun to explore and use. Also Jupyter notebooks on z/OS. Most interesting. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 1:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Anno

Re: IBM CMOS Processor Table

THANK YOU. I know your table and appreciate it. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 11.07.2025 o 23:06, Jim Elliott pisze: I have updated my CMOS Processor Table with the z17 and also fixed all the links that IBM broke in t

Re: IBM CMOS Processor Table

Tom Brennan Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 10:31:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM CMOS Processor Table Nice! But it says G16 for the z17. On 7/11/2025 2:06 PM, Jim Elliott wrote: I have updated my CMOS Processor Table <https://jlelliotton.blogspot.com/p/cmos-processor-tabl

Re: IBM CMOS Processor Table

PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM CMOS Processor Table Nice! But it says G16 for the z17. On 7/11/2025 2:06 PM, Jim Elliott wrote: > I have updated my CMOS Processor Table > <https://jlelliotton.blogspot.com/p/cmos-processor-table.html> with the z17 > and also fixed all th

Re: IBM CMOS Processor Table

Nice! But it says G16 for the z17. On 7/11/2025 2:06 PM, Jim Elliott wrote: I have updated my CMOS Processor Table with the z17 and also fixed all the links that IBM broke in their website reorg. Some of the older information is no

Re: IBM stock new high today!

. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 1:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM stock new high today! The place I was buying through at the time had a minimum purchase of two shares of whatever you wanted

Re: IBM stock new high today!

Ah, makes sense! Thanks. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 1:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM stock new high today! The place I was buying through at the time had a minimum purchase of

Re: IBM stock new high today!

The place I was buying through at the time had a minimum purchase of two shares of whatever you wanted to buy and you had to buy a total minimum of (I think) 20 shares of "stuff" or you had to pay a higher fee. I'm basically cheap, so I took the lowest number and picked 10 companies to buy shar

Re: IBM stock new high today!

Could it be due to this announcement that came in an email from them that I received today? Except follows: "IBM is developing a computer that is designed to withstand mistakes and continue operating despite them." "The company announced the blueprints to build IBM Quantum Starling, designed to r

Re: IBM stock new high today!

Why two? Just wondering! > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Brian Westerman > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 12:19 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM stock new high today! > > I bought two shares of IBM bac

Re: IBM stock new high today!

That's a fun idea, wish I'd done it. Why two? Just wondering! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 12:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM stock new high today! I bought two shares of I

Re: IBM stock new high today!

I bought two shares of IBM back in 1980 when it was around $5. I wish now that I had bought more, but at the time I just wanted to get two shares of each of the the companies I liked. I ended up losing more than I gained, but it has been interesting to watch the ones that have not gone belly u

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 27 Apr 2025 to 28 Apr 2025 (#2025-114)

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 27 Apr 2025 to 28 Apr 2025 (#2025-114) External Message: Use Caution COBOL allows definitions of decimal numeric fields to be signed or unsigned packed decimal or external decimal (as well as other other formats). I believe it had always generated

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 27 Apr 2025 to 28 Apr 2025 (#2025-114)

COBOL allows definitions of decimal numeric fields to be signed or unsigned packed decimal or external decimal (as well as other other formats). I believe it had always generated Compared Packed hardware instructions to compare signed decimal fields, ensuring that negative and positive were p

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?!

On Behalf Of Schmitt, Michael Sent: 23 April 2025 14:13 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?! The number at the end isn't a statement number. I created the error with a job with only 9 cards. But I can't find documentation of what, exactly,

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?!

sages that are multiple lines. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 9:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?! Love your sense of humor. On 4/22/2025 9:22 PM, Tabo

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?!

the JCL I used to produce this, but I would have to eliminate everyone on this list. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?! ***

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?!

would have to eliminate everyone on this list. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] IEFC452I !?! External Email - Use Caution

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

The IBM z-day conference is slated to start at 10:00 AM eastern time which is in a half hour, but the splash screen about it has a countdown saying it's an hour and a half. Any idea which is right? Rex -- For IBM-MAIN subscr

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

got email saying it's in 30 minutes, so... > > Timezones are hard. /s > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Pommier, Rex > Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 9:32 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Annou

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

Well, I just got email saying it's in 30 minutes, so... Timezones are hard. /s -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 9:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Pr

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

Classification: Confidential Most likely resource-link. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 3:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More [CAUTION

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More Where might I find the new POPs? On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 03:59:52 + Timothy Sipples wrote: :>Here are the many IBM Z-related announcement letters… :> :>https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/z17-make

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

of Jay Maynard <05997213d6c2-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 14:23 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More Yay! We've been working to specify a shiny new z16-AGZ to replace our z14 ZR1, which, due to our purcha

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

Binyamin Dissen asks: > Where might I find the new POPs? Not posted yet AFAIK, but I don't think that's unusual. The IBM z17 documentation library should appear in due course here: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/systems-hardware/zsystems I assume the new Principles of Operation book will be IBM Pu

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

Yay! We've been working to specify a shiny new z16-AGZ to replace our z14 ZR1, which, due to our purchasing process, would arrive about the beginning of September. Now we get to deep dive into this to see if we want to get a z17 instead, or if we even can. On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:01 PM Timothy S

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

Where might I find the new POPs? On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 03:59:52 + Timothy Sipples wrote: :>Here are the many IBM Z-related announcement letters… :> :>https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/z17-makes-more-possible :> :>https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/preview-zos-32 :> :>https://www.

Re: IBM Announces the IBM z17, z/OS 3.2 (Preview), Much More

For those who want technical details of the z17, these can be found in the Redbooks: https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/feature/z17 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Timothy Sipples Sent: 08 April 2025 04:59 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IB

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76)

t liable for any such corruption, > interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of billogden > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 10:28 AM >

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

IBM has posted more agenda-related details about IBM Z Day: https://community.ibm.com/zsystems/events/ibm-z-day-2025-se/ — Timothy Sipples Senior Architect Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cybersecurity IBM Z/LinuxONE, Asia-Pacific sipp...@sg.ibm.com -

Re: IBM Z Development and Test Environment - ADCD

That page talks about a zPDT -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John Blythe Reid Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 8:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Z Development and Test Environment - ADCD Hello, I'd hear

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

Thanks. Not your dog, but: about time! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 9:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 IBM has posted more agenda-related details about IBM Z Day

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76)

W dniu 21.03.2025 o 08:04, Andrew Rowley pisze: On 21/03/2025 11:18 am, Mike Schwab wrote: Yep.  z/OS has 3 incompatible versions of Java, so far. What do you mean by incompatible? I'm developing under Java 17 on a PC, and the same compiled jar runs on the PC and on z/OS under both Java 8 and

Re: IBM Z Development and Test Environment - ADCD

https://www.reddit.com/r/mainframe/comments/gjnv75/zpdt_and_ibm_isvs_question/ IBM was behind on the unexpected high volume of requests for the personal mainframe. Covid hit and it was suspended and not resumed. https://www.reddit.com/r/mainframe/comments/gjnv75/zpdt_and_ibm_isvs_question/ On Fr

Re: IBM Z Development and Test Environment - ADCD

https://www.reddit.com/r/mainframe/comments/gjnv75/zpdt_and_ibm_isvs_question/ Basically, the $1000 personal mainframe was derailed by Covid and not restarted, not to mention they weren't prepared for the volume of requests they got before covid. On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 8:04 AM John Blythe Reid <

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76)

On 21/03/2025 11:18 am, Mike Schwab wrote: Yep. z/OS has 3 incompatible versions of Java, so far. What do you mean by incompatible? I'm developing under Java 17 on a PC, and the same compiled jar runs on the PC and on z/OS under both Java 8 and Java 11. Seems pretty compatible. Can you elab

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76)

: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76) >For compiler listings and actual assembler listings, and assembler >inlines, and for interfacing with z/OS via its macro interfaces, PL/X >has always had a huge advantage over C/C++. AMEN For someone working on important

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76)

Please don't submit messages with: "Subject: ... Digest ...". On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:27:51 -0400, billogden wrote: >>For compiler listings and actual assembler listings, and assembler inlines, >>and for interfacing with >>z/OS via its macro interfaces, PL/X has always had a huge advantage over >

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Mar 2025 to 19 Mar 2025 (#2025-76)

>For compiler listings and actual assembler listings, and assembler inlines, >and for interfacing with >z/OS via its macro interfaces, PL/X has always had a huge advantage over >C/C++. AMEN For someone working on important, complex, long-term (decades) applications, it might appear that C/C+

Re: IBM Abandoning Metal C?

> On 17 Mar 2025, at 6:45 pm, David Cole wrote: > > On another thread, David Crayford wrote: > >> Our understanding is that Metal/C will not be updated for the next >> architecture or the one after that. > > > > Really? Does anyone have any idea why? > > Metal C already does not support Z16

Re: IBM Abandoning Metal C?

What's the best way to convey the importance of Metal/C to IBM? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 7:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Abandoning Metal C? > On 17 Mar 2025, at

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

Wow! Thanks Phil. On 3/10/2025 8:37 AM, Phil Smith III wrote: Various articles, most of which basically add no more detail than my Subject: line; https://www.silicon.co.uk/e-regulation/legal/ibm-wins-lawsuit-against-lzlabs-over-mainframe-patents-603173 has the most.

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

rch 11, 2025 7:22:36 am To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM wins against LzLabs Phil, >> I read (well, skimmed) the full decision (240pp) would you care to post the link? Martin -- For IBM-MAIN s

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

n List On Behalf > Of Bfishing > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:02 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 > > *April 8th, 2025 10am - 5pm ET * > > *Unveiling the future of mainframe technologies with 3 content-rich > technical tracks:* &

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

Phil Smith III Sent: 12 March 2025 14:28 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 That's not an agenda, that's a track description. I'm back to "Has nobody at IBM ever gone to a conference or even a user group meeting?" I can't block off

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

iginal Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bfishing Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 *April 8th, 2025 10am - 5pm ET * *Unveiling the future of mainframe technologies with 3 content-rich technical

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

I guess I'm just to used to seeing ics files over little circles for calendar invites: A closer look showed me the following (noting that I am sure these will not work unless you are registered): Google and Apple ones worked just fine. *Mark Your Calendar!* Make sure you save the date by adding t

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

*April 8th, 2025 10am - 5pm ET * *Unveiling the future of mainframe technologies with 3 content-rich technical tracks:* *🔹IBM zNext* – Experience cutting-edge enterprise computing with IBM zNext, featuring up to 8x AI processors per core for unmatched scale, performance, and security. Discover i

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

The STACK covered it in detail last summer- On 10.03.25 17:37, Tom Brennan wrote: Wow! Thanks Phil. On 3/10/2025 8:37 AM, Phil Smith III wrote: Various articles, most of which basically add no more detail than my Subject: line; https://www.silicon.co.uk/e-regulation/legal/ibm-wins-lawsuit-ag

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

I read (well, skimmed) the full decision (240pp) and have some observations. IANAL, of course, but these caught my eye: - Secret names ("Rent Control", "Texas Wormhole") from the start seem a bit suss - So does LzLabs buying Winsopia, which I still don't quite understand the point of, since they

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

Kurt Acker wrote: >Once registered, 3 technical tracks are displayed for the day. Um...I did, I see no agenda still? I see tiles for "badges" but that doesn't list sessions. Am I just missing this?? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

025 4:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM wins against LzLabs https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2025/532.html#para1121 Sent from Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Martin Trübner &

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

Phil, >> I read (well, skimmed) the full decision (240pp)  would you care to post the link? Martin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM wins against LzLabs External Message: Use Caution I read (well, skimmed) the full decision (240pp) and have some observations. IANAL, of course, but these caught my eye: - Secret names ("Rent Control", "Texas Wormhole") from the start seem a bit s

Re: IBM wins against LzLabs

It is arguable that this (the IBM win, and related) is counter productive. (But try to convince IBM exec/legal of it.) Since the exit of other vendors from the mainframe hardware market, industry interest in that architecture has waned. Meanwhile, other processor architectures, with less original

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

Well that's pretty dumb! But thanks. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bfishing Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 8:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 Once registered, 3 technical tracks are displayed for th

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

Once registered, 3 technical tracks are displayed for the day. IBM zNext (naming already proven by the gates from my return flight home from October Festival and a pic provided to Linkedin), AI & Data and App Dev & IT Ops. On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 8:37 PM Timothy Sipples wrote: > Phil Smith III wr

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

Phil Smith III wrote: >I'm not seeing an agenda there? An agenda summary (highlights), to be more precise. — Timothy Sipples Senior Architect Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cybersecurity IBM Z/LinuxONE, Asia-Pacific sipp...@sg.ibm.com

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

DU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 > which leads to an interesting agenda. I'm not seeing an agenda there? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject:

Re: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025

> which leads to an interesting agenda. I'm not seeing an agenda there? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Z Day: April 8, 2025 I note that IBM has posted a

Re: IBM

IBM beats profit estimates as software business surges on AI shift https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/29/ibm-beats-profit-estimates-as-software-business-surges-on-ai-shift.html?__source=iosappshare%7Ccom.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, January 29,

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Jan 2025 to 20 Jan 2025 (#2025-20)

I never had to think about blocksize when the input was from a physical card reader 50 years ago.  Best practices change so quickly! On 2025-01-21 12:00 a.m., IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote: Date:Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:48:36 -0500 From:Matt Hogstrom Subject: Re: Does this make any

Re: IBM Idea - Please consider

My guess, and that's all it is, is that the ssh-keygen creates a ebcdic file but it is untagged. On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 2:46 PM Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:08:57 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote: > > >I will let the implementation te

Re: IBM Idea - Please consider

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:08:57 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote: >I will let the implementation team figure it out. You make excellent >points - can you add them as comments to the Idea? > Done. In: you wrote: 1. using the

Re: IBM Idea - Please consider

I will let the implementation team figure it out. You make excellent points - can you add them as comments to the Idea? On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 1:06 PM Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:20:25 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote: > >---

Re: IBM Idea - Please consider

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 12:20:25 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote: >- > >All shell and utilities must respect the code page tag on all files. > "All"? some utilities are by design wisely exempt from autoconversion. These include od, cksum, iconv, and others. would it rely on autocon

Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI

Not just programs, though. Functions. Sorta like systrace on Linux and friends. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Van Dyke Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 7:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI If you have z/OS

Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI

If you have z/OS Debugger, a fairly simple script can get the debugger to write to the log file a trace of programs that have been called and labels (eg. COBOL paragraph names) of statements executed. Here's an example of JCL to run a batch job and have z/OS Debugger write a trace of programs call

Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI

With COBOL 6.4 at the base level, you can use ddname IGZPROUT at the run step of your JCL to generate a report of all dynamically called programs that are compiled with Enterprise COBOL 5 or later releases. With the COBOL runtime PTF for APAR PH61133 installed, the report contains COBOL 5 or later

Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI

You should be able to do this with Systems/C in LE mode. We have options for that, although I haven't tried it in an LE environment. Basically - you can tell the compiler to generate a macro invocation at the start and end of the function, which you could write to do whatever-you-want. Of cou

Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI

Michael Schmitt wrote: >What do you expect to get when the compiler optimizer inlines the call? A fair question. If it's a compile-time thing, I'd say it would be an option as to whether such non-calls "count" or not. Or maybe you compile without inlining if it's enabled. I'd expect there to at

Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI

What do you expect to get when the compiler optimizer inlines the call? Also, there's a simple way to get displays of all the section performs from a COBOL program. Not a trace table but close enough. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Smith III S

Re: IBM Z Open Editor PDF documentation?

chwab <05962a42dc49-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 6:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Z Open Editor PDF documentation? External Message: Use Caution https://ibm.github.io/zopeneditor-about/Docs/getting_started.html#using-ibm-z-open-editor-in-

Re: IBM Z Open Editor PDF documentation?

https://ibm.github.io/zopeneditor-about/Docs/getting_started.html#using-ibm-z-open-editor-in-cloud-based-editors On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 5:02 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > > Is the documentation for IBM Z Open Editor available as PDF? URL? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~sm

Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF

9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF Including, of course, adding suitable RACF profiles to control what groups or users are authorized to use the "sudo" command, what user identities they are allowed to change to, and which of those user

Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF

John Wooden > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Joel Ewing > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 9:13 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF > > Including, of course, adding s

Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF

think you are.” - - - John Wooden -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel Ewing Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 9:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF Including, of course, adding suitable RACF profiles to con

Re: IBM Idea - add sudo to IBM's OEF

Including, of course, adding suitable RACF profiles to control what groups or users are authorized to use the "sudo" command, what user identities they are allowed to change to, and which of those users or groups are required to supply a password associated with the new identity.   Those kinds

Re: IBM macros, SIIS and RENT (was: Relative Instructions not generated by some IBM macros, e.g. STORAGE and ATTACHX)

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:37:58 +0200, Bernd Oppolzer wrote: >... >what do you think of the idea asking IBM to provide a similar technique >(an optional parameter, >like MF=L and MF=E, which is present on almost all macros) on their >macros, so that the >definition of the work areas can be put in

Re: IBM macros, SIIS and RENT (was: Relative Instructions not generated by some IBM macros, e.g. STORAGE and ATTACHX)

This currently is. Possibly an MF=L in the static area. MF=L in the DSECT Copy static to DSECT and use MF=E Or am I missing something obvious? On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:37:58 +0200 Bernd Oppolzer wrote: :>Some topic drift: :> :>for one of my customers, I had to change some very old ASSEMBLER

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] Connect:Direct

variety of operating systems. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rich Tabor Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2024 11:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IBM-MAIN] Connect:Direct it is now IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Get Outlook

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >