Not just programs, though. Functions. Sorta like systrace on Linux and friends.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Peter Van Dyke Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 7:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI If you have z/OS Debugger, a fairly simple script can get the debugger to write to the log file a trace of programs that have been called and labels (eg. COBOL paragraph names) of statements executed. Here's an example of JCL to run a batch job and have z/OS Debugger write a trace of programs called and COBOL paragraphs invoked to the INSPLOG DD: //RUN EXEC PGM=SAM1 //CEEOPTS DD * TEST(,EQACMD,,:*) //EQACMD DD * AT GLOBAL ENTRY BEGIN; LIST CALLS; GO; END; AT GLOBAL LABEL BEGIN; LIST LINES %LINE; GO; END; GO; //INSPLOG DD SYSOUT=* Here's an excerpt from the output written to the INSPLOG DD: * At ENTRY in COBOL program SAM2 ::> SAM2. * From LINE 312.1 in COBOL program SAM1 ::> SAM1. * 75 000-MAIN. * * 84 100-CALC-BALANCE-STATISTICS. * * 306 210-PROCESS-CUSTFILE-RECORD. * * 401 730-READ-CUSTOMER-FILE. * * At ENTRY in COBOL program SAM3 ::> SAM3. * From LINE 324.1 in COBOL program SAM1 ::> SAM1. * 69 000-MAIN. * * 78 100-CALC-PRODUCT-STATISTICS. * * 306 210-PROCESS-CUSTFILE-RECORD. * * 401 730-READ-CUSTOMER-FILE. * Regards, Peter Van Dyke On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 08:07, Don Leahy <don.le...@leacom.ca> wrote: > With COBOL 6.4 at the base level, you can use ddname IGZPROUT at the > run step of your JCL to generate a report of all dynamically called > programs that are compiled with Enterprise COBOL 5 or later releases. > With the COBOL runtime PTF for APAR PH61133 installed, the report > contains COBOL 5 or later programs that are called dynamically, > statically, and via DLL linkage > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:18 Schmitt, Michael > <michael.schm...@dxc.com> > wrote: > > > What do you expect to get when the compiler optimizer inlines the call? > > > > > > Also, there's a simple way to get displays of all the section > > performs from a COBOL program. Not a trace table but close enough. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On > > Behalf Of Phil Smith III > > Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 10:14 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: IBM compiler/LE WIBNI > > > > When working with large systems, it would sure be nice if there were > > a > way > > to compile (or, even better, just run) with an option that generates > > a trace table of function calls. If I were writing a large system > > from scratch in, say, C, I would consider making every call a macro, > > which > could > > then test a flag, or enable the tracing at compile-time. > > > > I'm not really thinking IBM is going to say "What a great idea! > > Let's > drop > > everything and do this" (though I'll buy them a beer if they do), > > more hoping someone says "Hey, dummy, LE already offers that via the > > XYZZY option." > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
