Please don't submit messages with: "Subject: ... Digest ...". On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:27:51 -0400, billogden wrote:
>>For compiler listings and actual assembler listings, and assembler inlines, >>and for interfacing with >>z/OS via its macro interfaces, PL/X has always had a huge advantage over >>C/C++. > >AMEN!!!! >For someone working on important, complex, long-term (decades) applications, >it might appear that C/C++ is perhaps too slippery. Also, the frequently >changing C/C++ base is perhaps one reason for the missing manuals ---- >especially manuals that are specific to the System Z & z/OS designs. > >I like my PCs (usually!) and I like the IBM mainframes (mostly!), but I >believe they are best used for separate purposes. Attempting to make one to >be like the other might not be the best plan. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
